Edge Rewrite
Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Jonathan Gropper

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Draft:Jonathan Gropper (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Procedural nomination. Page creator User:Chevronchevron has applied twice for G7 but other wikipedians have made contributions. BusterD (talk) 21:38, 11 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Procedural keep. There are multiple editors who have been active on this page, and at least one of them doesn't want it deleted. So spirit-of-G7 does not apply. Not opposed to considering a non-procedural nomination if there is actually a reason different than a (nonapplicable) G7 rationale provided. Martinp (talk) 11:17, 12 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Comment - I have now substantially revised the draft to address the reasons for the 5 August AfC decline: removed unsourced claims, failed-verification citations, and promotional content, and added independent sourcing including USA Today (2020), Taiwan Business TOPICS (2022), Taiwan News (2023), Fast Company (2026), and HousingWire (2026) — see the draft's edit history. I intend to resubmit through AfC after this discussion closes. GuideguildATX (talk) 11:24, 12 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Recommend speedy close per WP:CSK item 3, No accurate deletion or merge rationale has been provided. No criticism of the nominator intended, but we're here purely due to a faulty G7 tag that was duly removed. No valid, non-procedural reason for deletion has been provided, and someone else is working on this draft intending to bring it to AfC. So there is nothing to discuss here at this time. (Note my keep above) Martinp (talk) 13:19, 12 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Keep. No good reason to delete has been provided. SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:15, 13 August 2026 (UTC)reply