Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journey of Souls
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Michael Newton. MBisanz talk 02:30, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Journey of Souls (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:BK. See related Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Destiny of Souls ScienceApologist (talk) 21:10, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:NB because of a lack of third-party reviews. No mentions on a Google Book search aside from the books themselves. DARTH PANDAduel 21:33, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to Michael Newton, unless and until sufficient references are included in the article. I suspect this may be possible. There are 75 mentions on google books. A number of these are adverts in other books, but others reference the book, and it is included in 50 Spiritual Classics. His books have apparently been translated into over 25 languages. It is likely that someone will input the book title as a search term. Ty 02:51, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect per Tyrenius. -- Nevard 04:32, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Is there anything else besides insufficient refs/reviews that would make this and Destiny of Souls deletion candidates? More references/reviews are available but require more time to include them in the article. Merge and redirect by Ty is also a smart option. AlexGWU (talk) 23:42, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- There's five days in which to improve the article with references, which are required to verify notability. Ty 02:25, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.