Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon Pritzl
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 09:30, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Brandon Pritzl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Assistant college basketball coach who fails WP:NSPORTS. Prod recently removed with an invalid rationale. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 17:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 17:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 17:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 17:32, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - associate head coaches are not head coaches. Fails WP:NSPORT.Onel5969 TT me 18:36, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Assistant coaches are kind of a mixed bag - some are notable while some are not. In this case, I think the sources indicate he meets GNG. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 02:49, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete does not pass the notability guidelines for coaches.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:10, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This would benefit from more analysis of the sources presented. All of those opining for deletion have cited a secondary notability guideline, two of which simply redirect to the top of the guideline page, without being more specific, and none have addressed the sources presented and whether or not the subject meets the General notability guideline. Ultimately, if subjects meet the GNG, it is not necessary for them to also meet a SNG.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:41, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Relisting comment: This would benefit from more analysis of the sources presented. All of those opining for deletion have cited a secondary notability guideline, two of which simply redirect to the top of the guideline page, without being more specific, and none have addressed the sources presented and whether or not the subject meets the General notability guideline. Ultimately, if subjects meet the GNG, it is not necessary for them to also meet a SNG.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:41, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per the sources found by EDDY, of the three I could access all contained significant coverage of this individual, and Green Bay, Wisconsin is a large enough place for its local media to be reliable. Devonian Wombat (talk) 10:38, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.