Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BioSpring
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:42, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- BioSpring (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Sources are mainly expansion announcements, funding rounds, partnership announcements and business listings. I am unable to find any independent, in-depth coverage that isn't WP:ROUTINE. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 19:01, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Business, and Germany. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 19:01, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- @Jeraxmoira:, did you check the sourcing at the original German article de:BioSpring Gesellschaft für Biotechnologie as well? TSventon (talk) 19:31, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- I’ve checked now. Sources in the DE article are the same as the ones cited here and they’re all routine news coverage of expansion and funding rounds. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 19:44, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- German has 6 sources, whereas English has 15. ~Rafael! (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 20:29, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- You added them now and it's the same coverage about the expansion, but from different news providers. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:36, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- German has 6 sources, whereas English has 15. ~Rafael! (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 20:29, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- I’ve checked now. Sources in the DE article are the same as the ones cited here and they’re all routine news coverage of expansion and funding rounds. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 19:44, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:12, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Celjski's table was saying mostly coverage of expansion in Offenbach. Should I change the topic to the expansion? ~Rafael! (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 16:02, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delete, none of the existing or newly added sources are of any quality.
| Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✘ No | ||||
| ✘ No | ||||
| ✘ No | ||||
| ✘ No | ||||
| ✘ No | ||||
| ✘ No | ||||
| ✘ No | ||||
| ✘ No | ||||
| ✘ No | ||||
| ~ Article is mostly about new factory in Offenbach | ✘ No | |||
| ~ Published by the American Chemical Society | ✘ No | |||
| ✘ No | ||||
| ✘ No | ||||
| ✘ No | ||||
| This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}. | ||||
Celjski Grad (talk) 15:28, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Delete, routine coverage as the citation analysis above shows, article does not indicate its suitability for inclusion in the enclyclopedia. Nayyn (talk) 15:49, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - Sources do not add up to WP:CORPDEPTH. Most are routine coverage of announcements, mentions, etc. which fall short of WP:ORGCRIT. There are a few book mentions but those also do not cover the company in-depth. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:24, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.