Edge Rewrite
Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alka Matewa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 09:45, 25 January 2015 (UTC)reply

Alka Matewa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable kickboxer or MMA fighter. Peter Rehse (talk) 16:14, 3 January 2015 (UTC)reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 16:14, 3 January 2015 (UTC)reply
  • Delete Coverage is routine sports reporting which is not enough to meet WP:GNG. Has only 1 win as an MMA fighter and only 1 top tier fight so he doesn't meet WP:NMMA. As a kickboxer he has a world title from some minor organization, but doesn't meet any of the notability criteria listed for kickboxers at WP:KICK. Jakejr (talk) 18:47, 3 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (rap) @ 21:45, 3 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (discuss) @ 21:45, 3 January 2015 (UTC)reply
  • Delete I agree with all of the previous comments. Routine sports coverage is insufficient to meet WP:GNG and he lacks the accomplishments to meet the specific notability criteria for either kickboxers or MMA fighters. Papaursa (talk) 03:49, 7 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  01:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:30, 18 January 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.