Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajit Chandra Chatterjee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. — Aitias // discussion 20:26, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Ajit Chandra Chatterjee

Ajit Chandra Chatterjee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

New page, on what seems to be a non-notable person. thisisace (talk) 23:33, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Salih (talk) 04:33, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

• Comment - It's true that the article doesn't really explain the grounds for notability, but I think the award may support the case. That's why I didn't do a speedy deletion. Deb (talk) 12:28, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
• Comment Keep: Padma Shri is one of highest civilian awards in India, a recipient is noteworthy. References are notable to prove the Padma shri claim. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 16:53, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Change vote as reference added. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:37, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

• Strong keep. (after edit conflict). The Padma Shri has only been awarded to 2095 people in over 50 years in a country with a population of over a billion, so its recipients are undoubtably notable. I've put a reference in the article to verify that the subject received it. Phil Bridger (talk) 16:56, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
• Strong keep. same reason as provided by User:Phil Bridger. Even google books show three results, though only in snippet view, and supporting Padmashri award info.--GDibyendu (talk) 09:32, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
• Keep per Phil Bridger. Salih (talk) 14:33, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
• Keep Per above. --Dwaipayan (talk) 20:29, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
• Keep Winning Padmashri definitely makes him notable. This article is a good reminder that not everything, alas, is googleable. Abecedare (talk) 22:34, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
• Keep, easily judged notable. Note that the nominator seems to have not even googled the title or contacted the newcomer author at User talk:Aaron3767 or Talk:Ajit Chandra Chatterjee. This is too bitey. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:56, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.