Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Yesterday

if page isn't updating.

Guide to deletion

Khurram Waqar

Khurram Waqar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to Qayaas because the coverage is focused on the Qayaas and there are attempts by the subject to promote themselves. Fails WP:GNG. BookishReader (talk) 23:52, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Pakistan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:20, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Alfalah Institute of Banking and Finance

Alfalah Institute of Banking and Finance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to Bahauddin Zakariya University because cited sources are unreliable and there is little independent coverage to pass WP:GNG. BookishReader (talk) 23:40, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Schools, and Pakistan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:21, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Rubina Gillani

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Rubina Gillani
• Articles for deletion/Rubina Gillani (2nd nomination)

Rubina Gillani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to Nauman Wazir Khattak because the coverage is focused on her husband or just namechecks her in routine news coverage like , , . BookishReader (talk) 23:21, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: this did survive the first nomination in 2018 (a traditional deletion discussion that did not propose a redirect), but perhaps even in the otherwise-strict BLP topic area our standards were lower even that recently; it has been tagged as a potential NBIO failure since 2024. (No opinion.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:24, 11 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Military, Medicine, and Pakistan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:25, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

May 2026 White House shooting

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/May 2026 White House shooting
• Articles for deletion/May 2026 White House shooting (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/May 2026 White House shooting (3rd nomination)

May 2026 White House shooting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Security incidents involving Donald Trump because now that a significant amount of time has passed, it is clear this incident did not receive enough WP:SUSTAINED coverage to warrant a stand-alone article. NesserWiki (talk) 23:02, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Events, Politics, and Washington, D.C.. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:26, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

• Merge and redirect per nomination. No sustained coverage of this event specifically. Khalitate (talk) 05:10, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep, it's August, this just happened in May. There is no way to tell if this will obtain sustained coverage or not as events continue. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:05, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

St. John Cantius Roman Catholic Church, Philadelphia

St. John Cantius Roman Catholic Church, Philadelphia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to List of churches in the Archdiocese of Philadelphia. This appears to be a WP:RUNOFTHEMILL church that lacks official historical designation, significance, and I believe overall fails WP:GNG. Red0ctober22 (talk) 22:38, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and Pennsylvania. Red0ctober22 (talk) 22:38, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Keep as per this source here on page 18 the church is a legally protected building so not run of the mill in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:21, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

  Similar to the discussion about Holy Family Catholic Church (Philadelphia), I believe that source you have provided is sufficient, but this is another extremely poor and lacking article that I believe needs significant improvement. I now propose moving to draftspace. Red0ctober22 (talk) 01:08, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:26, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

St. John the Baptist Roman Catholic Church, Manayunk

St. John the Baptist Roman Catholic Church, Manayunk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to List of churches in the Archdiocese of Philadelphia. This appears to be a WP:RUNOFTHEMILL church that lacks official historical designation, significance, and I believe overall fails WP:GNG. Red0ctober22 (talk) 22:36, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Christianity, and Pennsylvania. Red0ctober22 (talk) 22:36, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep, don't redirect. According to this article, the monumental church, dating from 1894 with a significant architect is not on the historic register only because the Archdiocese didn't want to limit its options. There are several sources in the article which fulfill the WP:GNG. Travellers & Tinkers (talk) 23:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

How exactly do you believe the sources fulfill WP:GNG? The design of this church by Patrick Keely is certainly something of significance, though I would note that not all of the churches designed have their own article, so just because it was designed by him, that's not necessarily an automatic indicator of notability. Red0ctober22 (talk) 00:02, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Holy Family Catholic Church (Philadelphia)

Holy Family Catholic Church (Philadelphia) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to List of churches in the Archdiocese of Philadelphia. This appears to be a WP:RUNOFTHEMILL church that lacks official historical designation, significance, and I believe overall fails WP:GNG. Red0ctober22 (talk) 22:35, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and Pennsylvania. Red0ctober22 (talk) 22:35, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Keep according to this source here the church is a legally protected building so not run of the mill in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:11, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

  Thank you for providing that source. I have typically been withdrawing these AfD nominations once I see proof of official historical significance, but this article in particular is extremely poor and lacking in content. This church is significant, but I do not believe this article itself can remain in its present form as a live Wikipedia article. I would wish to change this discussion to a proposal to move to draftspace. Red0ctober22 (talk) 01:05, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:27, 11 August 2026 (UTC)
• Keep per https://www.phila.gov/media/20220713111124/234-240-Hermitage-St-nomination.pdf. No reason to dratify.Djflem (talk) 13:37, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

  I no longer dispute the significance of the church itself that it deserves an article. I am arguing that the current state of the article itself is inadequate for Wikipedia standards and thus should be moved to draft space until it can be improved. Red0ctober22 (talk) 14:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

St. Josaphat Roman Catholic Church in Philadelphia

St. Josaphat Roman Catholic Church in Philadelphia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to List of churches in the Archdiocese of Philadelphia. This appears to be a WP:RUNOFTHEMILL church that lacks official historical designation, significance, and I believe overall fails WP:GNG. Red0ctober22 (talk) 22:34, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and Pennsylvania. Red0ctober22 (talk) 22:34, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:27, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Sur Nutrition

Sur Nutrition (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. No significant coverage of this company in reliable sources. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 22:13, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United States of America. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 22:13, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:28, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Mysterios

Mysterios (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page covers Rey and Dominik Mysterio's brief tag team run. However, all of this information on the page is already covered in detail on both of their individual pages, so this isn't really adding anything that isn't available elsewhere. Most of the page is also somewhat dubious to include (Dominik's brief appearances as a kid in the early 2000s don't particularly justify noteworthiness of the tag team), and going through the refs, they all appear to be routine match recaps rather than discussing the pair as a team, so the page fails GNG (while the "first father-son" angle is a unique trivia note, it's only mentioned in passing reference in a few sources and doesn't justify a page on its own). While both Rey and Dominik are certainly notable, I'm not convinced a separate page is needed for their pairing when there's little direct coverage and all this information is already on their individual pages.

Nominating for deletion rather than merging since all useful info has already been added to Rey/Dom's pages. RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 20:34, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Wrestling. RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 20:34, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Brayden Cross

Brayden Cross (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV as the article relies solely on two sources, one of which is not reliable per WP:IMDB. Alith Anar 20:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Film, Sports, Basketball, United States of America, and Ohio. ASUKITE 20:27, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

delete per nomination. Article made by single purpose account and my own search yielded no other significant coverage. Creator is also removing evidence of a previously declined AfC in 2024 from the archives Yojo98 (talk) 20:43, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep – The article is supported by independent newspaper coverage. The Coshocton Tribune published a March 13, 2023 article titled "Coshocton native lands part in LeBron James biopic," which specifically covers Cross's involvement in the 2023 film Shooting Stars. I understand that IMDb should not be relied upon to establish notability. I believe the independent newspaper coverage should be considered when evaluating the article under WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. B4381 (talk) 20:57, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

  I would encourage you to review WP:BASIC. At a minimum, multiple published, secondary, reliable sources are needed here. Yojo98 (talk) 21:01, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Searching newspapers.com only yields a reprint of the Coshocton Tribune article already mentioned here. The IMDB page for the actor declares him as "uncredited", which is WP:UGC, but an interesting point.ASUKITE 03:06, 11 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete and salt. I also looked at newspapers.com and nothing popped up. A one-time local human interest piece referenced above does not make this subject notable. Also, the single-purpose account feels abundantly like self-promotion. I'm voting for salting this article because it gives off the signals of the SPA re-creating it in the future when he thinks nobody's monitoring it anymore (whether with that account, or a sockpuppet). I've seen this sort of backdoor self-promotion play out countless times so salting feels appropriate here. SportsGuy789 (talk) 04:17, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

  Re: salting, there's been past failed draft submissions at Draft:Brayden Cross. —Bagumba (talk) 07:39, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

  I'd support salting as well given the reasons mentioned by SportsGuy Yojo98 (talk) 12:28, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete - it's definitely not enough to meet notability. Furthermore, I'm concerned it's self-promotion, especially because he already has a TVTropes before any of the usual signals for getting a TVTropes (such as participating in a notable work, becoming internet-famous, etc) - not sure if that's also a self-promotion thing or just random chance, but makes me fishy. I wouldn't be opposed to salting, but i'm also not advocating for it. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 04:32, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Doesn't make GNG or BIO. Khalitate (talk) 05:12, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: A one-film actor playing an insignificant role without noticeable newspaper coverage is certainly not notable for encyclopedia. He is not listed in "Cast" section of Shooting Stars (2023 film) article and IMDB also shows that his role in the film was uncredited. WP:NACTOR requires the person to play multiple significant roles (meaning credited ones) in multiple significant films. Not gonna dive into arguments whether that's someone's self-promotion or simply non-successful contribution of a single-purpose author, but solid Delete due to failure to pass WP:NACTOR, WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Jean Mélenchon (talk) 12:06, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

List of terms referring to an average person

List of terms referring to an average person (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to List of placeholder names because of the massive WP:OVERLAP between the content of two pages. Even if there were a technical difference between a "name that refers to average person" and a "placeholder name for a person", which I really don't think exists, these pages have straight-up the same content. The only true difference is that this page only contains names of people, while the other one mostly contains names of people. I don't know which is better, but they definitely need to be merged in some way or another. This was also flagged at the talk page but nothing came of it, so I'm bringing it to AfD. There's also a similar article titled List of English-language placeholder names for people, but that one is pretty well written and very specific in its scope, unlike those two other articles. FaviFake (talk) 19:58, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of People-related AfD discussions. FaviFake (talk) 19:58, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Lists. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:31, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

AGREE I would agree with the claims made and that merging is advisable. List of Placeholder Names seems like the superior article and the information from List of terms referring to an average person should be expanded on (as much as possible) and moved into that since while the former article is in paragraph form, the latter is closer to a list. SavageSquad67 (talk) 05:32, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

23rd Century: Ngasigee Matungda

23rd Century: Ngasigee Matungda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Film fails to meet WP:FILM criteria for notability Astra Travasso (talk) 19:07, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Astra Travasso (talk) 19:07, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Manipur-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:31, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Phouoibi Shayon

Phouoibi Shayon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Film fails WP:FILM notability requirements Astra Travasso (talk) 19:05, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Film, Entertainment, and India. Astra Travasso (talk) 19:05, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Tanan Lohawatanakul

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Tanan Lohawatanakul
• Articles for deletion/Tanan Lohawatanakul (2nd nomination)

Tanan Lohawatanakul (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While this isn't a G4, there's no indication that the factors raised in April in the AfD have changed. Star Mississippi 12:55, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Thailand. Star Mississippi 12:55, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:07, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep - NACTOR is met through his main roles in Boys in Love and When Oranges Fall. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 22:25, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 18:51, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Draye Redfern (entrepreneur)

Draye Redfern (entrepreneur) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article does not meet WP:GNG and the author's edit history is suspicious. The subject had another article with just his name, no disambiguation, which was deleted May 10, 2026. The disambiguation of (entrepreneur) is not needed as there are no other named articles that would create conflict. A search for additional sources did show articles in Forbes and Huff Post, but they are written by contributors. (WP:HUFFPOCON, WP:FORBESCON). Se7enNationArmy2024 (talk) 18:34, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, Businesspeople, Cycling, and United States of America. Se7enNationArmy2024 (talk) 18:34, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - I can't find any significant media coverage for him or his agency. Here's the old discussion. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Draye Redfern Mike Gauya (talk) 20:08, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Advertising, Italy, and Texas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:06, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Randeep Singh

Randeep Singh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only 3 matches at I-League and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Svartner (talk) 18:30, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, India, and Punjab. Svartner (talk) 18:30, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Thomas Merton Award

Thomas Merton Award (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This formal merge proposal was incorrectly opened on the article's talk page. Following the March 2026 RfC, formal merge discussions are now held at AfD rather than the historical Proposed article mergers process (PAM). I've moved the discussion accordingly per WP:TPO.

Moved from Talk:Thomas Merton Center (Pittsburgh) § Merge suggestion

 – FaviFake (talk) 18:28, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Merge to Thomas Merton Center (Pittsburgh)

I don't think the award needs its own article, the center itself is barely notable.Prezbo (talk) 11:01, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Merge per nominator's rationale. FaviFake (talk) 18:28, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Awards and Pennsylvania. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:31, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

List of foreign footballers in European communist countries

List of foreign footballers in European communist countries (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a glaring WP:NOR / WP:SYNTH / WP:LISTN / WP:NOTDATABASE / WP:DEFINING violation. --Joy (talk) 18:24, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Football, Albania, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Georgia (country), Germany, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Ukraine, and Yugoslavia. --Joy (talk) 18:24, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Lists of people. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:30, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete as original research. The introductory essay about Football in the Soviet Bloc might be a notable topic, but this version is completely unreferenced, so probably not salvageable. pburka (talk) 18:55, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete because the list is OR. Khalitate (talk) 05:13, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:NOT. C679 07:38, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination; nothing to be salvaged here. – Vipz (talk) 07:41, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Back in the World Live

Back in the World Live (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This formal merge proposal was incorrectly opened on the article's talk page. Following the March 2026 RfC, formal merge discussions are now held at AfD rather than the historical Proposed article mergers process (PAM). I've moved the discussion accordingly per WP:TPO.

Moved from Talk:Back in the World Live § Merge proposal

 – FaviFake (talk) 18:22, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Merge to Back in the U.S.

Newtatoryd222's idea. They argue that this album is just an alternate version of McCartney's Back in the U.S., and I stand in agreement. Judging from the article, this album has hardly any secondary sources to vouch for it, whereas Back in the U.S. does. It doesn't even have a critical review on AllMusic. DannyRogers800 (talk) 13:11, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

One other thing: Even if you didn't take in to accountability the reused sources from the Back in the U.S. article: the only source I found while trying to help save the article a bit was this review of the album by the Independent and a section on the album in Lennon and McCartney: Together Alone. But even then, that's only two sources (four if you include the "ratings" in the album ratings template). So, I support this merge, obviously. Newtatoryd222 (talk) 13:27, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Merge per above, too much WP:OVERLAP. FaviFake (talk) 18:23, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:24, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

List of foreign footballers in top leagues of former Yugoslavia

List of foreign footballers in top leagues of former Yugoslavia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a glaring WP:NOR / WP:SYNTH / WP:LISTN / WP:NOTDATABASE / WP:DEFINING violation. --Joy (talk) 18:20, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Football, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Serbia, Slovenia, and Yugoslavia. --Joy (talk) 18:20, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Lists of people. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:24, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep and rename to List of Yugoslavia international footballers born outside Yugoslavia, it is the same as List of Lebanon international footballers born outside Lebanon (which is a FL) and many other lists HerrHeulsuse (talk) 09:44, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

What? That's not the same list. The entries in this list were not international footballers for Yugoslavia. A lot of them are entirely unrelated to Yugoslavia because it had ceased to exist a long while before. It's entirely originally researched, synthesized list based on no other coherent such list found outside Wikipedia, which litters the encyclopedia with arbitrarily composed data. --Joy (talk) 12:20, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

2014 FIFA World Cup marketing

2014 FIFA World Cup marketing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This formal merge proposal was incorrectly opened on the article's talk page. Following the March 2026 RfC, formal merge discussions are now held at AfD rather than the historical Proposed article mergers process (PAM). I've moved the discussion accordingly per WP:TPO.

Moved from Talk:2014 FIFA World Cup marketing § Merge with 2014 FIFA World Cup

 – FaviFake (talk) 18:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Merge into 2014 FIFA World Cup

I think this is a possible candidate for merging. It's largely promotional in tone, and similar sporting events don't always have separate pages for their marketing efforts. This seems like it was set up to praise the marketing campaign. Haz215 (talk) 08:46, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Merge per nominator's rationale. Not nearly long enough to justify remaining split. FaviFake (talk) 18:20, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Agreed, and thanks for moving the discussion to the correct place. Haz215 (talk) 18:25, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising and Football. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:23, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Oppose. 2014 FIFA World Cup is already large. AFD is not a substitute for cleaning-up article issues. Tbhotch^™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 18:28, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:10, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Gunhild of Wenden

Gunhild of Wenden (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This formal merge proposal was incorrectly opened on the article's talk page. Following the March 2026 RfC, formal merge discussions are now held at AfD rather than the historical Proposed article mergers process (PAM). I've moved the discussion accordingly per WP:TPO.

Moved from Talk:Świętosława § Merge

 – FaviFake (talk) 18:15, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Merge to Świętosława

Gunhild and Świętosława are the same person, actual name unknown. She has a third name in legend, Sigrid the Haughty, but I haven't tagged that for merging. Srnec (talk) 17:53, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Merge per nominator's rationale. WP:DUP FaviFake (talk) 18:16, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, History, Royalty and nobility, Denmark, and Poland. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 18:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

United Association for Studies and Research

United Association for Studies and Research (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

a BEFORE search shows org has quite a few mentions and ties to other notable subjects, but no SIGCOV, failing NORG. Most depth I can find is two paragraphs. —BrechtBro (talk) 17:52, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Academic journals, Organizations, Palestine, and United States of America. —BrechtBro (talk) 17:52, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Islam and Illinois. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:12, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

The Show Theatre

The Molson Canadian Theatre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable for its own standalone page. Several sources barely focus on the actual theatre and rather the casino itself. Furthermore, the majority of the claims on this page are unverifiable and are likely original research. While I did find sources supporting the casino's 2006 expansion, the specific opening date of "September 16" is not supported. Aspifi (talk) 16:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related AfD discussions. Aspifi (talk) 16:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:37, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Music-related AfD discussions. Bridget (talk) 19:52, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Comment I suppose this could be merged to Great Canadian Casino Vancouver without losing much, but multiple articles in a regional paper about the building's name changes suggest some notability. Not sure what is supposed to be unverifiable here. The September date is easily verifiable on search engines, suggesting an inadequate BEFORE.—BrechtBro (talk) 22:22, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

  This nomination was before the sources for the opening were added. Aspifi (talk) 22:27, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Heliomonadida

Heliomonadida (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging this article with Granofilosea because it is not used in the hierarchy as in Adl et al., 2019, and it is rarely mentioned in protistology works. Jako96 (talk) 16:38, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Biology and Organisms. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:37, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Science, Biology, and Organisms. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 17:39, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

See comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cryptofilida.  —  Jts1882 | talk  13:39, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Leucodictyida

Leucodictyida (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging this article with Granofilosea because it is not used in the hierarchy as in Adl et al., 2019, and it is rarely mentioned in protistology works. Jako96 (talk) 16:38, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Biology and Organisms. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:36, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

See comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cryptofilida.  —  Jts1882 | talk  13:40, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Cryptofilida

Cryptofilida (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging this article with Granofilosea because it is not used in the hierarchy as in Adl et al., 2019, and it is rarely mentioned in protistology works. Jako96 (talk) 16:38, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Biology and Organisms. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:36, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Oppose regarding the two listed reasons:

1. Adl et al. (2019) is not meant to be an exhaustive list of every taxon in the hierarchy, but a very general-scope revision that focuses on phylogenetics. Each section was curated to a higher or lesser degree by a certain group of authors, so detail is extremely limited for some taxa. Therefore, absence in this work does not equal lack of notability.
2. Rare mention does not equal lack of notability. For a taxon that contains only two species, 17 results in Google Scholar is quite good; far superior than Caelestes whose diversity and article size are comparable.

— Snoteleks (talk) 18:28, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Oppose for the above reasons. Cryptofilida appears in the cladogram in Granofilosea so it is certainly used. A case could be made that Cryptofilida and the other orders flagged for deletion (Leucodictyida, Heliomonadida) would be best covered in an expanded Granofilosea, in which case the order articles would be converted to redirects. The Protist project talk page or Talk:Granofilosea would be better venues rather than multiple AfD pages, so the discussion is kept in one place.  —  Jts1882 | talk  13:36, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Eric Sim (author)

Eric Sim (author) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Created by a single-purpose account that is likely an undisclosed paid editor. Does not meet WP:GNG. Seems promotional. Aleain (talk) 16:13, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Singapore. Aleain (talk) 16:13, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

February 2010 Kabul attack

February 2010 Kabul attack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to 2010 in Afghanistan (now deletion) because no no sigcov on Google Books (sources also seem unreliable), Google News shows other events instead of this one, and the same thing happens with Google Scholar This suggests it fails WP:LASTING and WP:CASESTUDYHerrHeulsuse (talk) 08:19, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Terrorism, and Afghanistan. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 08:19, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: When recording historical events in a highly unstable regional environment, it is hard enough to keep our pages up to date with the significant events for which there is reasonable proof of, this has no sigcov, and is, unfortunately, just another event of terror in an area where events of terror are (or were) common place enough that nearly 20 deaths wasn't a persistently newsworthy event. Foxtrot620 (talk) 14:01, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

  Why shouldn't it be merged? Lots of news sources are used for information in articles, its just that, for events, they're not all you can base an article upon unless they span years. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 07:02, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

  Why should it be merged? There is no lasting impact of the event, the event was drowned out of the cultural zeitgeist, and there is no evidence that it is of any encyclopedic value. It's tragic, yes, but simply a forgotten event that happened. The article 2010 in Afghanistan is not served by this addition, which doesn't meet WP:lasting. If it isn't lasting enough for an article, it isn't lasting enough for a mention on a timeline in an article. Foxtrot620 (talk) 18:51, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

  I support deletion, you're right, we risk setting a horrible precedent, which could make these year articles clogged with trivia. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 15:46, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Merge per nomination. The event received a lot of coverage at the time, but it was not LASTING enough for a standalone article. Khalitate (talk) 05:38, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Merge or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Merge. Lasting impact is not required for article content. An incident where over a dozen people died, as discussed by reliable sources, is worth merging somewhere. PARAKANYAA (talk) 20:33, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Steven Kazmierczak

Steven Kazmierczak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:BIO1E, this article is only about 2,200 words and can be merged into the main article covering the shooting, there are also other more notable shootings like Uvalde, or Christchurch where the perpetrator doesn't have their own article. ILoveSmallEdits (talk) 07:29, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and Illinois. ILoveSmallEdits (talk) 07:29, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
• Weak merge per nominator's rationale. FaviFake (talk) 17:46, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

  Per what? FaviFake? Comparing to other cases? CoryGlee 17:56, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

  @CoryGlee No, per WP:BIO1E. FaviFake (talk) 19:03, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

  LOL CoryGlee 19:35, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Oppose as mover to main space because the rationale that "other more important cases" do not have their article is subjective. Who determines what is more important ... "more important" in these issues? Besides, the lives of these individuals vary greatly and are unrelated. Anyway, I do not care, but I leave my oppose here. PS: Don't ping me because I won't reply. Thx. CoryGlee 17:52, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
• A similar case was discussed regarding Adam Lanza. By the way, seeing the argument from the user that "others do not have their own...", I have taken a look at their page and they barely signed up this year. I understand why they compare to other articles, which is a staunch no in here. CoryGlee 17:55, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

GAZ Volga

GAZ Volga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This formal merge proposal was incorrectly opened on the article's talk page. Following the March 2026 RfC, formal merge discussions are now held at AfD rather than the historical Proposed article mergers process (PAM). I've moved the discussion accordingly per WP:TPO.

Moved from Talk:Volga (marque) § Merge proposal

 – FaviFake (talk) 14:25, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Merge to Volga (marque)

GAZ Volga page pretty much copies the content of this one with more information, the pages feel like duplicates of each other. Anon13131313 (talk) 10:07, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

• Oppose. GAZ Volga covers the original line of cars. This article is (or appears to have been intended to be) about the revived brand of rebadged Chinese models. There is no reason to make information more difficult to find by combining the two. --Sable232 (talk) 14:15, 26 July 2026 (UTC) As an aside since I'm now part of this mess - dumping merge discussions into AfD is the single stupidest thing Wikipedia has ever done. It's an utterly asinine process and the reason why I don't propose page merges anymore. --Sable232 (talk) 14:48, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

  I won't argue, there are six different cars that have Volga as the brand name (seven if you include Siber, which brand relation is a debate in itself) and it would be nice to have information about them listed seperately. I just couldn't think of many examples of car models turning into their own brands to find their pages. What also doesn't help is the fact that all the cars supposed for the original model page are listed here. Now that I think about it, old Volgas were definetely sold as its own brand outside of Soviet Union which is also worth mentioning in the articles. Anon13131313 (talk) 17:35, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:22, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:41, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
• Oppose per Sable232. Moreover, "GAZ Volga" is a longstanding article, while "Volga (marque)" is [I don't really know what it is, a fork?] created one and a half years ago. --Moscow Connection (talk) 09:17, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Another question, when we split the articles, should Siber and the Chinese cars be removed from GAZ model timeline template? Anon13131313 (talk) 13:14, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 07:27, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Commment would a merge in the opposite direction work, per GAZ Volga being both the long-standing version and having more content? Having two articles about the same brand seems redundant per WP:DUP. PaulT2022 (talk) 22:32, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Princess Olga of Hanover

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Princess Olga of Hanover
• Articles for deletion/Princess Olga of Hanover (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Princess Olga of Hanover (b. 1958)

Princess Olga of Hanover (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See previous AFD. Doesn't seem to have been significantly improved (but I can't see the old article...) so should be deleted for the same reasons: fails WP:BASIC, WP:GNG, and WP:NOTGENEALOGY. - In solidarity, UtherSRG (talk) 13:57, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, and Austria. - In solidarity, UtherSRG (talk) 13:57, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:18, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: for clarity, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Olga of Hanover (b. 1958) was for someone else with this title (as the disambiguation shows, that one was born in 1958; the current subject died that year). At one point, a previous iteration of this article (after the first deletion in 2020, a 2024 recreation was quickly G4'd) was actually called Princess Olga of Hanover (1884–1958) instead in deference to the other one (which, to add to the confusion, was the original article at this title, before the existence of articles for both necessitated disambiguation in 2008). No opinion on any of this. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:54, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. Like it or not (and it's clear that some editors do not) the grandchild of a king was and is notable. These are the people who filled the columns of newspapers of the time. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:38, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

  I neither like nor dislike. I merely want the community to weigh in as this article was previously deleted. Since you are an admin, can you at least weigh in on whether the current articles has significant improvement over the deleted version? Can you demonstrate with fact (vice supposition) that this person is notable? - In solidarity, UtherSRG (talk) 14:38, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

  If that is the best argument for keeping the article, th article should be deleted. We have a guideline, WP:INVALIDBIO, which clearly states that A being related to someone notable "is not a reason for a standalone article on A". If she did indeed fill the columns of newspapers, please show it because that would be a proof of notability. Surtsicna (talk) 17:56, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

  Sorry, but I don't have access to hard copies of 19C/early 20C German newspapers! But, as we should all know, they are still valid sources. As we all also should know, royal families were a big deal at the time and "being related to someone notable" doesn't really apply to a king's granddaughter. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:19, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

@Surtsicna, Geschichte, Smeat75, TimothyBlue, and Bearian: Tagging participants of previous AFD. - In solidarity, UtherSRG (talk) 14:42, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect, as I said the first time, in relevant parts: "per User:Bearian/Standards#Notability_of_Consorts_of_nobility, ... and WP:CHEAP, to Prince Ernest Augustus, 3rd Duke of Cumberland and Teviotdale, her father .... I note she was unmarried, and avoided publicity either by way of scandal or charitable work." The only new thing in this version is speculation about her marriage prospects, which was about as scandalous as she got. Thank you, UtherSRG, for the ping. Bearian (talk) 15:12, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
• REDIRECT - agree with Bearian on the target. Fails GNG and NOTGENEOLOGY, there is no WP:SIGCOV. At best this merits a sentence in the target - the article can basically be rewritten as: "She was the great-great-granddaughter of a king, lived a reclusive life, and nothing is known beyond geneological facts and speculation."  // Timothy :: talk  18:07, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect, no GNG sources have been identified, and presumptions of coverage based on INVALIDBIO are, well, invalid. JoelleJay (talk) 12:27, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 07:25, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep I'm new to this so apologies for any misstep but I think it's useful to keep an actual page for this person because of the other people with the same name and title. It would be of use to any researcher or interested person to have an actual physical page with a photograph, (since one exists) in order to clarify and confirm which Princess Olga they are looking at, especially when birth and death dates are coincidental. It would send a clear message that Wiki has done its homework and isn't mixing up princesses or dates. Under these circumstances I think the lack of detail is not a problem and I agree that (rightly or wrongly) princesshood confers notability in most cases. ~2026-42636-56 (talk) 09:32, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

  None of those arguements are within our policies and guidelines for articles about individual people. - In solidarity, UtherSRG (talk) 14:35, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect per previous arguments.Illini11 (talk) 12:46, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Ricky Megee

Ricky Megee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE and per this discussion on the talkpage. I myself am neutral in the discussion. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:00, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related AfD discussions. Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:00, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:32, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: It's not often we see a Good Article up for deletion, but might fail WP:ONEEVENT. Geschichte (talk) 13:21, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

  Well, that could be solved by moving it, if the event is considered notable. ONEEVENT failures where the event is notable are solved by moving, not deletion. BLPREQUESTDELETE notwithstanding. PARAKANYAA (talk) 23:16, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

  Moving to change the topic also requires consensus. So while there is a different procedure for that, that consensus can also be established on AFD. IgelRM (talk) 21:56, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - he appears not to have understood the effects of this one incident at the time, as he just wanted to survive. I wish him well in his future endeavors. Bearian (talk) 02:36, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 06:00, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep but rename to Stranding of Ricky Megee or Survival of Ricky Megee. It is a notable event and has been covered multiple times in recent years. He even wrote the book on the event that received coverage, so it meets WP:NEVENT but fails WP:NBIO. WP:SUSTAINED coverage include , , , , . Cambridge's American Empower B2 Upper Intermediate uses Ricky Megee's story as a reading and speaking exercise . ~2026-43230-66 (talk) 22:49, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
• Comment (paid representative of the subject): I would like to provide some additional context relevant to the suggestion above, without taking a position on the outcome of this discussion. Renaming the article to Stranding of Ricky Megee or Survival of Ricky Megee would not address the concern underlying the subject's deletion request, since it would preserve substantially the same standalone coverage of the same individual and traumatic event.

  I would also respectfully question whether the sources cited in the "Keep but rename" comment above demonstrate sustained coverage of the event as a standalone topic.The 2008 Police Journal source is a short review of Left for Dead published in connection with the book; the National article likewise concerns the book; the Washington Post and Australian Traveller pieces are retrospective features covering multiple survival stories; the 2017 source is a master's thesis from the University of Zagreb; and the Cambridge source is educational material. These certainly demonstrate that Megee's story has occasionally been retold or referenced, but that seems different from sustained substantial coverage establishing the 2006 incident as an independently notable event warranting its own article.

  For additional context, the subject has explained to me that he did not seek an ongoing public profile following the event. He has also explained that the book was not initially his initiative and that he agreed to it reluctantly, with the subsequent interviews being connected principally with its publication. He later stopped speaking publicly about the experience and sought to return to private life.

  For clarity, I am acting as Ricky Megee's paid representative and my conflict of interest has been disclosed. I am providing the above solely as additional factual context for the community's consideration. Toometa (talk) 08:14, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep but rename. The story had a wide coverage so it would rather be renamed than being deleted. MichealKal (talk) 17:18, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - seems to fit the criteria for WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE pretty well. This is a person of marginal notability at best who is only notable for this one event. Per the guideline, unless the subject clearly passes GNG, "editors should seriously consider honoring such requests." This is not a clear GNG pass. I don't think renaming the article would alleviate these conserns. Pawnkingthree (talk) 01:25, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Whether WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE now applies probably needs more discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:14, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Amit Kataria

Amit Kataria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

For lack of significant coverage. I don't see anything reliable. Last of The Time (talk) 05:24, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: India, Delhi, and Haryana. Last of The Time (talk) 05:24, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
• Keep: @User:Last of The Time do you check the references that are provide in the article and you searched about Amit Kataria at google and In my knowledge the article meet to WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG or the article have significant coverage from the highly reputed and recognized media houses and newspapers, like The Times of India, Deccan Herald, Business Standard, ABP News and Dainik Jagran and Dainik Bhaskar and other media houses.etc and I thought the nominator is wrong starts WP:AFD.Cptabhiimanyuseven •[@píng mє] 10:21, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
• Keep: A quick WP:BEFORE leads to many reliable sources around the individual. The Hindu , The Economic Times and Al Jazeera , the article already cites several other good sources, an article is pretty much warranted for an administrator who was previously rebuked for informally receiving Prime Minister of India and now holds secretary office in the Ministry of Rural Development (India). The AfD should be deemed to be premature as little to no rationale has been presented. Naslmah (talk) 09:14, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep per Deccan Herald, Business Standard, Hindustan Times sources on him. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 12:55, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: As @Cptabhiimanyuseven stated, the article cites reliable sources like the Times of India and the Deccan Herald. Additionally the sources do more than just make a trivial mention of Amit Kataria, so the article does not fail WP:SIGCOV.

AɭʋaKʰedək (talk) 13:50, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. Enough SIGCOV exists. Khalitate (talk) 05:15, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Source assessment table prepared by User:Last of The Time

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/chhattisgarh-government-warns-bastar-collector-amit-kataria-for-wearing-sunglasses-while-receiving-modi/article7209538.ece			WP:ROUTINE. This is not an in-depth article about Amit Kataria. As the headline itself indicates, the story is primarily about Mr. Kataria being warned for not wearing appropriate dress while receiving the Prime Minister.	✘ No
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/ias-officers-rebuked-for-dress-code-violation-during-pm-modi-visit/articleshow/47298691.cms?from=mdr			WP:ROUTINE. The same story published by 'The Hindu'.	✘ No
https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/features/2015/7/23/india-making-inroads-in-maoist-stronghold			Article having subject's quote "Naxals prohibit three key developments in places they control, said Bastar district’s collector and magistrate Amit Kataria.", "“Smaller facilities like hand-pumps [for ground water] and makeshift school buildings are allowed. So we are fighting for basic stuff here,” Kataria said.	✘ No
https://gad.cg.gov.in/ias/view_preview.aspx?fn=CL/2025/01/0429			CIVIL LIST OF IAS OFFICERS 2025	✘ No
https://www.bhaskar.com/local/chhattisgarh/raipur/news/amit-kataria-returned-to-chhattisgarh-deputation-ended-ias-officer-joining-chhattisgarh-ministry-133585331.html			No in-depth coverage. "फिलहाल कोई विभाग नहीं मिला; BJP सरकार के 8 महीने में वापस प्रदेश आने वाले 5वें अधिकारी"	✘ No
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/education/news/who-is-amit-kataria-a-look-at-indias-richest-ias-officers-education-and-career-path/articleshow/115259558.cms			WP:RSNOI	✘ No
https://www.deccanherald.com/india/meet-amit-kataria-indias-richest-ias-officer-with-rs-89-crore-worth-do-you-know-his-salary-4068956			no by lined. WP:RSNOI	✘ No
https://wikiias.com/2004-batch/amit-kataria-ias-chhattisgarh			Replica of Wikipedia	✘ No
https://www.jagranjosh.com/general-knowledge/who-is-amit-kataria-1731590302-1			WP:RSNOI. Paid reporting in India.	✘ No
https://navbharattimes.indiatimes.com/state/chhattisgarh/raipur/ias-amit-kataria-became-the-secretary-in-the-health-department-know-his-profile-and-working-style/articleshow/116602306.cms			WP:RSNOI. Paid reporting in India.	✘ No
https://npg.news/bureaucrats/ias-amit-katariya-biography-in-hindi-ias-amit-katariya-ka-jivan-parichay-jivani-janiye-kaun-hai-chhattisgarh-cadre-ke-ias-amit-katariya-1264319			Biography	✘ No
https://www.livehindustan.com/national/who-is-the-countrys-richest-ias-officer-amit-kataria-he-used-to-take-a-salary-of-rs-1-201731553508373.html			WP:RSNOI. Paid reporting in India.	✘ No
https://www.business-standard.com/india-news/who-is-amit-kataria-india-s-richest-ias-officer-who-took-rs-1-as-salary-nc-124111200666_1.html			WP:RSNOI. Paid reporting in India.	✘ No
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/chhattisgarh-government-parries-rti-queries-on-notices-to-2-ias-officers-for-dress-code-violations-during-pm-narendra-modis-visit/articleshow/48188364.cms??from=mdr			Passing mentions	✘ No
https://www.newindianexpress.com/india/2026/Aug/01/do-whatever-you-want-chhattisgarh-bjp-mp-files-privilege-notice-against-ias-officer-over-alleged-misconduct			Passing mentions	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Last of The Time (talk) 06:28, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per above, the source assessment table is full of errors, falsely indexing independent sources as parameter "no". Passes WP:BLP1E as such with their controversy and having an office in central government. There's no justification given as to how the person is not covered significantly in RS, The Hindu alone gives enough insights on his controversial event. ᚃᚔᚠᚓᚱᚅ Wyvern (♠️💛) 07:09, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Trends towards keep, but the assessment table merits more discussion I think.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:11, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

I very much disagree with the source assessment table - it makes no real sense, describes national independent consensus RSs as routine when they cover a subject with sigcov in a clearly not-routine way, and for some reason describes Al Jazeera, a RS, as ? reliability. My vote remains as stated above (Keep). Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 00:38, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

SEEQC

SEEQC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

SEEQC

This article on this quantum computing company has been created in both article space and draft space. A review of the sources shows that some of them are press releases, some of them are interviews with the CEO of the company, and some of them are about the technology. I did not read reference 2, which is paywalled, but am inferring that it is about the technology. If someone can read it and verify that it is about the company, it will be 1 source that meets all of the criteria for corporate notability. As it is, some of the sources are not independent, and some of them are passing mentions.

Number	Reference	Remarks	Independent	Significant	Reliable	Secondary	Meets NCORP
1	https://techcrunch.com/2025/01/14/with-30-million-in-new-funding-seeqc-thinks-chips-are-key-to-building-useful-quantum-computing/	An interview with the CEO	No	Yes	Yes	No	No
2	https://www.newscientist.com/article/2516804-could-a-niche-80s-technology-be-the-key-to-better-quantum-computers/	Paywalled article. Appears to be about the technology rather than the company.	Yes	Probably not	Yes	Yes	Probably not.
3	https://www.alumni.hbs.edu/news-insights/stories/quantum-leap	An alumni profile of the CEO by Harvard Business School	No	Yes	Yes	No	No
4	https://www.businessinsider.com/major-quantum-computing-announcements-made-during-nvidias-gtc-conference-2025-3	About NVIDIA, not about the subject company	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No
5	https://www.wsj.com/articles/ibm-has-a-roadmap-to-a-fault-tolerant-quantum-computer-by-2029-91645d73	About IBM, not about the subject company	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No
6	https://washingtonexec.com/2025/09/booz-allen-seeqc-expand-partnership-to-advance-quantum-computing/	A press release by Booz-Allen	No. A press release	Marginal	Yes	Yes	No
7	https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/uk-national-quantum-computing-centre-gets-novel-cross-qubit-system-from-seeqc/	A press release by a partner UK agency	No. A press release	Marginal	Yes	Yes	No
8	https://www.alumni.hbs.edu/news-insights/stories/quantum-leap	Same as 3	No	Yes	Yes	No	No
9	https://www.sbir.gov/portfolio/184513	Abstract of a Small Business Innovative Research award to the company and its predecessor	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No
10	https://nypost.com/2025/12/29/business/quantum-computers-the-size-of-your-fingernail-are-being-built-in-westchester-ny/	A long interview with the CEO	No. An interview.	Yes	Yes	N/A	No
11	https://nypost.com/2025/12/29/business/quantum-computers-the-size-of-your-fingernail-are-being-built-in-westchester-ny/	Same long interview as 10	No. An interview.	Yes	Yes	N/A	No
12	https://www.wsj.com/articles/merck-venture-arm-invests-in-quantum-computing-startup-seeqc-11586454285	About Merck research, including a mention of SEEQC	Yes	No. Passing mention.	Yes	Yes	No
13	https://www.engineering.com/seeqc-partners-with-itri-to-make-sfq-control-chips/	A press release	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
14	https://www.nature.com/articles/s41928-026-01607-2	A long abstract about quantum computing	Yes	No. Passing mention.	Yes	Yes	No
15	https://www.nature.com/articles/s41928-026-01607-2	Same long abstract as 14	Yes	No. Passing mention.	Yes	Yes	No
16	https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-intelligence/ai-tech-brief/2026/06/23/ai-tech-brief-americas-quantum-industrial-policy/	Detailed coverage of quantum computing, with interview with CEO	Yes	Not about the company, only about the subject.	Yes	Yes	No

There is already a draft, so deletion will leave the draft, which can be resubmitted via AFC with additional sources when additional sources are found. In the meantime, the Heymann criterion is to find two reliable sources that provide significant coverage.

• Delete as nominator. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:06, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Computing, and New York. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:06, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

The paywalled article, reference 2, in New Scientist was written by science writer Karmela Padavic-Callaghan, who earned a PhD in theoretical condensed matter physics and atomic, molecular and optical physics from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Their research has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including Physical Review Letters and New Journal of Physics.

Reference 2 is a feature about the company that meets NCORP standards.

Number 4 was supporting evidence for the NVIDIA citation in Business Insider.

The Nature Electronics paper is an entire peer-reviewed, scientific paper validating the company's research. The whole thing is paywalled, but this deserves a closer look. It is about the company (their research specifically) and does meet NCORP standards.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41928-026-01576-6 Sqwunty (talk) 12:10, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:09, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. In response to the references quoted by Sqwunty above, the paywalled article reference 2, is only a mention-in-passing *about* the *company* (because the chip being discussed was fabricated by the topic company ("The carrier chip was fabricated at Seeqc’s foundry using our SFQuClass proces")). The paper appears to have been written by employees and/or people connected with the company. In a nutshell, there is no in-depth information *about* the *company*, fails CORPDEPTH, and it appears that the paper was written by people affiliated with the company, fails ORGIND. It makes no difference whether it was peer reviewed, the topic is not the company's research, the topic is the actual company - if the research is notable, then write an article about the research. Reference #4 regurgitates a company announcement and quotes from the CEO, that is not independent content and fails ORGIND. HighKing⁺⁺ 16:22, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

2004 Tashkent suicide bombings

2004 Tashkent suicide bombings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to List of Islamist terrorist attacks because this page falls under WP:NOPAGE and very likely does not meet WP:NEVENT. There are books that cover this event after it happened, like this one, but this is from the US state department, which was involved in this event, so it is not WP:INDEPENDENT. In terms of WP:NEVENT, coverage does not demonstrate WP:LASTING effects or any casestudies HerrHeulsuse (talk) 08:18, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Terrorism, Islam, Uzbekistan, Israel, and United States of America. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 08:18, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Merge to Islamic Jihad Union, the perpetrator. The list is too broad to be a good redirect in lieu of this one. PARAKANYAA (talk) 06:35, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per WP:NEVENT and WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE. There has been substantial coverage over time of this event, as evident from Google Books. The nomination places undue emphasis on a single book, creating a distraction. For a short article, this one does a good job of focusing on the event itself rather than its background or aftermath. gidonb (talk) 09:15, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Still adding that the target is unsuited as it is far too high level for merging. gidonb (talk) 00:34, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep - seems to meet CONTINUEDCOVERAGE (quick GScholar search for >2005). Dunno about LASTING (but would err on does meet side given apparent coverage), and dunno about sources' independence (but would err on are independent from quick perusal). - Asdfjrjjj (talk) 07:37, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:48, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. There is LASTING coverage. Khalitate (talk) 05:40, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:07, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Graphical timeline of prehistoric life

Graphical timeline of prehistoric life (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to History_of_life#Emergence_of_animals because although this graphical timeline is useful and obviously required effort, it is unclear why it has a dedicated page for itself. The article is unreferenced, and only links to creatures named in the graph. Additionally it is only linked to by passing mentions in other lists or timelines, and would not easily be found by users. I do not want this page's contents deleted, as they are helpful for users, but its existence as a seperate article is questionable and I believe a merge under WP:MERGENOT is fair. XanderK09 (talk) 14:35, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Archaeology, Biology, and Organisms. XanderK09 (talk) 14:35, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Merge per nominator's rationale. You should've probably boldly performed the merge yourself, this proposal seems uncontroversial. FaviFake (talk) 18:31, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: History and Lists. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:16, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete This is a random assortment of genera, selected by no clear criterion, presented in a confusing two-column format. I could see a case for an entire series of cleaner versions of these by, e.g., class, so that an actual overview is created, but this thing on its own is just weird artefact and should not be integarted into another article. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 11:21, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Claudius Pulcher

Claudius Pulcher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ancient Roman nomen/cognomen pairings aren't appropriate for dab pages. The entries should probably be merged to Pulcher. Clarityfiend (talk) 13:10, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Muhammad Hilmi Gimnastiar

Muhammad Hilmi Gimnastiar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BIO1E appears to apply here. Rather than an undue article on the person, Wikipedia should cover this information as a standalone event, if at all. At least two of the references currently on the page refer to a second Indonesian player receiving a lifetime ban. C679 12:59, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Football, and Indonesia. C679 12:59, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. C679 13:00, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:34, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete – Per WP:NOTNEWS. An amateur-league player who committed a violent foul or assault does not warrant an article. Svartner (talk) 14:52, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, per WP:NOTNEWS as well. HazelAlbertSheriff (talk) 17:39, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:05, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Keeper (matchmaking website)

Keeper (matchmaking website) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cited sources that are not the company's own mostly read like routine announcements ("startup secures funding", etc.) Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:57, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Business-related AfD discussions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:57, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete Looks like some random LLM slop dating website. Nothing notable here. Simonm223 (talk) 13:00, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete The references section looks amazing. ly bad. 海盐沙冰 _{/ aka irisChronomia / Talk} 13:07, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete As per G5 the Article was created by Blocked user Zero Contradictions --BengalMC (talk) 13:47, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:34, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sexuality and gender and Artificial intelligence. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Praelector

Praelector (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Little more than a unsourced WP:DICDEF, and even the only link provided is essentially an (archived) primary source. ZimZalaBim^talk 04:02, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education and United Kingdom. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 04:28, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. Perfectly acceptable article. Can probably be expanded. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:13, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of England-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:56, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 12:22, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, per G7. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:43, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Morten Dahm Kjærgaard

Morten Dahm Kjærgaard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page accidentally created, I meant to only make the sandbox version but clicked "publish" instead of closing it. VasilT (talk) 12:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: I would recommend that you either nominate the Article on CSD in G6 error or just blank the page. The editors will speedy delete it as soon as possible BengalMC (talk) 12:31, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Denmark. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:32, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Jamie Paige

Jamie Paige (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although Paige may arguably barely scrape by as notable under WP:GNG, after combing through the sources used here, I'm not confident she meets WP:MUSICBIO.

• There are 11 non-primary sources; the only three that I think may count towards meeting MUSICBIO are AudioPhix, Merry-Go-Round Magazine, and possibly this Bandcamp editorial. The reliability of each of these is not clear.
  • Given that Paige publishes most of her music on Bandcamp, I'd say the third especially is a questionable source, and it also feels like it might fail the criterion that states publications where the musician or ensemble talks about themselves and advertising does not qualify. Is this advertising? It's certainly walking a very thin line in that regard. Even if it is reliable, Paige isn't the main topic of the article, so I'm not sure it counts as significant coverage.
• Another source, The Sentinel Sound, identifies itself as a high school student newspaper. This also discounts it as per MUSICBIO, which exempts Articles in a school or university newspaper (or similar), in most cases from counting towards notability.
• Another source is a radio interview with Paige, uploaded to the interviewer's YouTube channel. This being an interview with Paige, it wouldn't count towards notability for the same reason as the Bandcamp article. It is also stated that this interview aired on WNYU-FM, which might also make it invalid as the publication of a university.
• The remaining sources are all WP:PRSOURCES about the Unbeatable DLC and the Hatsune Miku Digital Stars live events, which also appear to fail MUSICBIO as it exempts reprints of press releases from counting towards notability.

In my WP:BEFORE, I found no other significant sources about Paige, so unless any can be found I'm not certain that this article should be retained. Perhaps it could be redirected to Unbeatable (video game), but given that she is only tangentially related to that game I don't think that would be a particularly great target, especially for anyone looking for more in-depth information about her. I'd love to be proven wrong about this if any better sources can be found, but, especially for a transgender musician with a big online following, the sourcing of this article is far weaker than I'd personally feel comfortable with when it comes to a BLP. silviaASH (inquire within) 12:08, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, Women, Music, Video games, and LGBTQ+ studies. silviaASH (inquire within) 12:08, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

The fact that it's getting nominated for deletion instead of being rejected at the draft stage (where it remained for six months) is kinda funny yet it leaves a bit of a sour taste in my mouth hehe

I jest, because although I feel kinda disappointed, you bring up very valid points. I hadn't considered the music biography guidelines beyond the basic WP:GNG and didn't realize that not one, but two of these sources were university-based and that they don't contribute to notability on enwiki. I also don't want to opt into merging with Unbeatable because it makes no sense to do that. She's a contributor to the game, but it's not like she's a lead developer. Her contributions are also relatively recent.

The two sites you named, AudioPhix and Merry-Go-Round Magazine seem to be long-running sites with dedicated editorials and appear generally reliable. AudioPhix in particular is a lart of a larger network of websites by the company Fansided, whereas MGRM is independent. I see no reason to not let them establish notability. That being said, the radio interview is also one of the only glimpses we get with Paige. She doesn't do interviews much, unfortunately. That, the Bandcamp interview, and one livestream that's related to a recent song of hers ("Do No Harm") are the only times I've ever seen her talk about her own work at length on other people's platforms. The interviews don't form my argument for her notability, though; their purpose is to complete the article more thoroughly. I'm afraid I didn't catch myself as well as I should've. Fallbackintoreality (t • c) 15:30, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

It could be possible to instead have a Flavor Foley page, I think there could be more source material that way. ~2026-43981-48 (talk) 19:03, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

While I agree with you in spirit, and that it would be great to have, that doesn't stand up to scrutiny in practice. Vane and Rice are usually self-promoted as individuals, and the same applies to their group with Jamie. Flavor Foley is remarkably new (founded in 2024) and hasn't had the chance to get covered by any secondary sources -- breaking a key notability guideline, which is also being argued for Jamie here. Fallbackintoreality (t • c) 22:10, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

I hadn't caught that the article had been moved from draftspace. Given that the article has been worked on for so long and clearly has editors dedicated to it, I would be supportive of re-draftifying the article as an alternative to deletion. This is definitely one of those cases where I can very easily see the topic's notability looking very different given at least a year's time. Or, this could be merged into the Flavor Foley draft if ever they're shown to be notable. silviaASH (inquire within) 23:30, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep - Musicbio doesn't have to be met, only GNG - it's an or, not an and in criteria - and the WP-Three are fine here. AudioPhix is solid, MerryGoRound is fine, and Bandcamp's publication is an independent editorial as far as I can tell - plus it's seven paragraphs, which is absolutely Sigcov. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 00:50, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete- I don't think this is suitable for Wikipedia, as there just isn't enough verifiable secondary source information to confirm notability. It's a textbook case of WP:BFDI to me, in that despite Jamie Paige undeniably being popular, there isn't enough reliable confirmation of this (and what little that does exist is mostly composed of student publications). I personally think this should be deleted until she's covered by an adequate amount of notable publications to fulfil the requirements of such an article. N0tFor$ale (talk) 07:27, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete - This subject is clearly not suitable for Wikipedia. For one, the article only features 3 reliable, notability contributing sources, (outside of Unbeatable,) which, MerryGoRound, is routine music promotion rather than in-depth coverage. This already doesn't meet GNG, and the article also blatantly fails Musicbio. As mentioned by N0tFor$ale, this is an example of WP:BFDI, and Paige isn't suitable for a page. Beanbeans424 (talk) 12:34, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

How to eat ice cream

How to eat ice cream (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTHOWTO Gjs238 (talk) 11:56, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per Wikipedia:NOTHOWTO Aude (talk) 13:09, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:32, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete. It's a great joke, but not an article. SenshiSun (talk) 18:53, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

This article is very useful for people like myself who have trouble eating foods and don't have anyone to teache them how to eat it RustySparrow (talk) 02:59, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

WP:NOTHOWTO Wikipedia is an encyclopedic reference, not an instruction manual, guidebook... Gjs238 (talk) 12:28, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Topic is a non-starter. Geschichte (talk) 07:49, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Lamia Bazir

Lamia Bazir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable as government official, nor as businessperson. Solely promotional spam bio page. Faisl ANYBIO. Jørgen Rü (talk) 11:53, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Politics, and Morocco. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:31, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Candace Victoria Mitchell

Candace Victoria Mitchell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly promotional CEO page, non-notable businesswoman.Remove as spam. Jørgen Rü (talk) 11:51, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, and Georgia (U.S. state). Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:30, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep - three strong sources there in Forbes (an editor, not a contributor), BeautyMatter (as Candace Mitchell Harris), and WWD. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 00:53, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Zowasel

Zowasel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails NCORP, non of the mentioned soruces is independent and reliable with meeting NCORP. Poor paid sources and churnalism or brief mentions only. Some sources are missing already like this Jørgen Rü (talk) 11:49, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, and Nigeria. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:29, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Celeste Vogel

Celeste Vogel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly promotional CEO page, non-notable legal executive, no reliable independent media coverage provided, only routine mentions serving as promo-CV page. Remove as non-notable PR profile Jørgen Rü (talk) 11:47, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Law, Cameroon, Ghana, and Switzerland. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:28, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Franc Kamugyisha

Franc Kamugyisha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP ANYBIO; highly promotional, non-notable businessman, no reliable independent media coverage provided, only routine mentions serving as promo-CV page. Jørgen Rü (talk) 11:46, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Environment, and Uganda. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:27, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep - IMO Commonwealth Young Person of the Year is an award sufficient for ANYBIO - awarded by an intergovernmental organization to one top person out of 50-something countries. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 01:05, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Florian Kemmerich

Florian Kemmerich (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Routine carreer description, nothing notable per Wikipedia rules, Forbes con article ctied, overall quality of references is not qualifying for the wikipedia standalone page. Promotional CV page. Jørgen Rü (talk) 11:44, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Sportspeople, Martial arts, and Germany. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:26, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

John McCalla-Leacy

John McCalla-Leacy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Despite the fact there are many citations they do not provide significant independent coverage of the subject. Main problems: Routine appointment announcements WP:ROUTINE) like Bloomberg Tax, ESG Today and ESG News each report that he took up or was dismissed of ESG role. Trade-press "X appointed to Y" references are true routine business coverage and are churnalism.

Lists, awards, extra details throughtout the article are higly promotional. Jørgen Rü (talk) 11:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Sportspeople, and England. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:25, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete – Just personal WP:PROMO. Svartner (talk) 18:51, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: WP:PROMO, failure to meet criterias of WP:CREATIVE, failure to pass WP:NSPORT, WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Unclear how he is notable as a businessman when he's actually only one of many KPMG executive board officials, as well as how he is notable as a sportsperson when the article does not even specify specific competitions and/or awards he has won. Most references in the article are either trivial mentions of the subject or businesspeople directories like this which are neither independent nor considered reliable. While Financial News Top 50 ranking may sometimes be useful in proving potential notability when other basic GNG requirements are met, it is not the case in this situation. I see no option other than deletion. Jean Mélenchon (talk) 07:29, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Franz Haselböck

Franz Haselböck (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was not able to find any further WP:SIGCOV of this musician, and he appears to fail WP:NMUSICBIO. If more sources are found, please ping me. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 11:34, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related AfD discussions. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 11:34, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:24, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Keep – The first search I did lead to an entry for him under his brother's entry (Hans Haselböck) in the Oesterreichisches Musiklexikon. If he's notable enough for them, he should be notable enough here. His entry at the German National Library points to links with an extensive list of recordings, some of which are mentioned in books, like The Afterlife of Bach's Organ Works (2023), and specialist journals (The American Organist) PS: Nominating after just 1 day seems hasty. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 04:21, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

I P Mission School

I P Mission School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not SIGCOV. Fails WP:GNG as well as WP:NSCHOOL. Coderzombie (talk) 10:56, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Gujarat. Coderzombie (talk) 10:56, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Christianity. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:31, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: Found one okay-ish source and nothing useful besides that to warrant standalone notability to this page. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 05:38, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep Historical school and heritage building. There are references elsewhere (not added in article). , So there is a chance to expand it further.

Nizil (talk) 06:07, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

None of them are WP:SIGCOV and hence, don't count towards WP:GNG.

• Source 1 = Just a single line, stating the inaugural year of the school. (And somehow that doesn't match with the year mentioned in the article.)
• Source 2 = It's just a travel guide, definitely not a WP:RS -- BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 11:33, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Comment : Originally I nominated the article because the burden for WP:NSCHOOL has gone up after the change. However, the historical nature of the school/building might make it less inclined to delete. Still lacks SIGCOV, but I'd wait for larger consensus. Coderzombie (talk) 12:12, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Joseph Salubi

Joseph Salubi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nomination, to fix malformed AfD nomination by User:Aurafish, whose deletion rationale was: The subject's independent notability is unclear. Most of the available sources focus on CKay, Boyfriend Music, and Salubi's professional relationship with CKay, rather than providing significant independent coverage of Joseph Salubi himself. The sources appear to be routine announcements, interviews, and company-related coverage, and it is unclear whether the subject meets the requirements of WP:GNG or WP:NMUSIC. I have no position one way or the other. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 10:46, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Music, and Nigeria. SunloungerFrog (talk) 10:46, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

National Doctors Forum

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/National Doctors Forum
• Articles for deletion/National Doctors Forum (2nd nomination)

National Doctors Forum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Also nominating:

Swadhinata Chikitshak Parishad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Both fail to meet WP:NORG, as no sources with significant coverage were found. Notability is not inherited. — Raihanur (talk) 10:25, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, Medicine, and Bangladesh. — Raihanur (talk) 10:25, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: presumably (based on the deletion sorting lists), the nominal lead article (National Doctors Forum) is the same subject as the first nomination from 2015 (unlike this one, that was a standalone with no bundle), which ended in deletion. This iteration did pass AfC in 2025, for what that's worth. (No comment with regard to Swadhinata Chikitshak Parishad, and no opinion on either article.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:26, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Keep - the previous AfD had only two participants (1 delete, 1 keep, no in-depth arguments). The article as it exists now is well sourced, with references indicating notability of the organization. --Soman (talk) 22:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

  Can you point out a single "source indicating notability"? I mean, I’m not seeing a single source that goes beyond routine coverage. If there are multiple sources that meet WP:GNG, I would happily withdraw the nomination. — Raihanur (talk) 01:40, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Battle of Ray (1194)

Battle of Ray (1194) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Totally unsourced, previously moved to draft and restored without substantial improvements. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:14, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Events-related AfD discussions. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:14, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, and Iran. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. This article has no sources. Trumpetrep (talk) 12:33, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

  I’ve added English sources. Previously, the sources were in Persian. It should be better now. YounggRealIceTalha (talk) 22:15, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to Tughril III#Battle_of_Rey Oakchris1955 (talk) 12:38, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Redirect per Oakchris1955. --Kansas Bear (talk) 22:38, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Snigdha Chowdhury

Snigdha Chowdhury (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Kinda pseudo-biography.. While the subject arguably meets WP:BASIC at the borderline, all sources are related to a single event, which is clearly neither notable nor significant. Sooooo, the subject does not satisfy WP:1E. — Raihanur (talk) 10:08, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Edit: At this point, after analyzing all the sources, I can see that the subject doesn't even meet WP:BASIC, as no significant coverage. — Raihanur (talk) 07:07, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Women, and Bangladesh. — Raihanur (talk) 10:08, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep - there's clearly multiple events here - the alleged illegal assets, the alleged assault claims she filed, and, let's not forget, her work as a main character in a notable film Pressure Cooker (2026 film). Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 01:09, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

There are multiple events, yes, but she is not "notable" for any of them except the assault allegations (see WP:BLP1E, it uses the term "notable" not just participation). Sources only cover the subject significantly in the context of that single incident. If you strip away that event, the remaining coverage is merely routine, which does not warrant a standalone article. WP:PSEUDO elaborates even further, If the event itself is not notable enough for an article, and the person was noted only in connection with it, it's very likely that there is no reason to cover that person at all... — Raihanur (talk) 02:45, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

I'd disagree - she's notable for being a star in a notable film, at least - doesn't have to be enough notability for GNG, just enough to show she isn't only known for one event. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 04:17, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

No, being a cast (or star?) in a notable film isn't enough (as notability is not inherited). This brings us to WP:NACTOR, which requires "significant roles in multiple notable films". Since this was her debut film, she does not meet this criteria. And my bad for my previous reply; actually, she isn't even notable for a single event (no source with WP:SIGCOV). — Raihanur (talk) 07:14, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Zin Nyi Nyi Aung

Zin Nyi Nyi Aung (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is unsourced. A very similar draft exists at Draft:Zin Nyi Nyi Aung. There's no need to leave the unsourced article in main space. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:06, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related AfD discussions. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:06, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Myanmar. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:16, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Deviniti

Deviniti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. No significant coverage about the company to establish notability. Routine coverage with primary sources, company database, listings, financial results, etc. - The9Man ^Talk 09:08, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Artificial intelligence, and Poland. - The9Man ^Talk 09:08, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Technology. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:17, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per NCORP. Renata•3 01:17, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

They're mentioned on the Polish gov website: Generative AI in Business report, GovTech hackathon, and one of their C-level is a part of governmental "Future Council". They're contributors to Bielik.ai - Polish LLM :) (source: Polish Development Fund). They're collaborating with government and they're involved in consultation//instruction/implementation of AI for Polish companies. Their implementation of chatbot for Credit Agricole is described in book "The Agentic Enterprise: A Leader's Guide to Orchestrating, Governing, and Scaling AI Agent Systems", page 102, publisher: O'Reilly Media, ISBN: 9798341672499. Their website is cited in publication like , , , , , , , , , (some with DOI number). I think that's sufficient influence to confirm notability. Kedziorek1998d (talk) 15:43, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 10:02, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Brunswick star

Brunswick star (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Performing WP:AFD2 for a WP:TA requested at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Archive 80 § No sources for the name "Brunswick Star":

== No sources for the name "Brunswick Star" ==

Hi, so I'm here because at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#How_to_nominate_a_single_page_for_deletion it says "post a message at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion requesting that someone else perform the nomination, making sure to explain your rationale there."

The article is Brunswick Star https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brunswick_star. It has two references but neither even uses the term Brunswick Star.

The reference desk editors tried to find sources to improve this and could not. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Humanities/2026_July_1#Brunswick_star

Notably, they also couldn't find the term used in published heraldry books.

So possibly this is not a real term and the article should be deleted?

thanks. ~2026-25530-49 (talk) 23:14, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

FaviFake (talk) 13:57, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:18, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment It's certainly a real thing - see many references from the 19th century regarding its use in regimental badges, and also in cut-glass decoration and postal cancellation stamps - but I'm not convinced it has a single clear definition. Going by the number of hits in more recent sources, the quilting pattern with the same name may have a good claim to being the primary topic now. Adam Sampson (talk) 16:00, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts and Police. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:45, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep - the Brunswick Star pattern is a real term as stated in the above comment. It is discussed as used on a badge in some British military regiments in this book. It's also referenced in books about cut-glass (e.g. English and Irish Cut Glass 1750-1950 by E.M. Elville, 1953), articles about cut glass, and in quilting, such a museum website, and a university collection. Appears the page needs clarification, editing and expansion with reference to reliable sources. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 00:46, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 07:27, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 10:01, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep, as detailed above this is real, notable, and sourced. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:09, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Servo (radio control)

Servo (radio control) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Servomotor as possibly the best resolution of the misleading article title, see corresponding discussion) ChaoticNeutralCzech (talk) 07:22, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related AfD discussions. ChaoticNeutralCzech (talk) 07:22, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 10:00, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Robert Sarvis

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Robert Sarvis
• Articles for deletion/Robert Sarvis (2nd nomination)

Robert Sarvis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Three-time third-party candidate for office who did not receive significant coverage during any of his campaigns. A 2013 nomination resulted in no consensus, but it seems worth revisiting. The article often reads more like a CV, resume, or piece of promotional content than a neutral page. Over the years, editors have pared back some of the most egregiously self-promotional content, but what's left is still a page for someone who does not meet NPOL and otherwise fails GNG. No obvious redirect target, though perhaps it could be redirected to the Libertarian Party of Virginia. PA Uploader (talk) 04:36, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Law, and Virginia. PA Uploader (talk) 04:36, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 09:56, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Ansariyan Publications

Ansariyan Publications (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was unable to find any sources that help notability, though I did not search in Persian. A lot of citations to books they have published and nothing else. As far as I am aware, fails WP:GNG/WP:NCORP. PARAKANYAA (talk) 18:23, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Comment. As PARAKANYAA rightly points out, the English sources here fail and just point back to the publisher's own catalog. Deleting a longstanding Iranian publisher without checking Persian sources is maybe a gap. Charlie Zachary Allen Roth (talk) 03:52, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  I mean I tried, but searching in the Persian writing system is difficult for me. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:55, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, Islam, and Iran. PARAKANYAA (talk) 18:23, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:41, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

I agree with @Charlie Zachary Allen Roth's comment. It probably shouldn't be deleted without someone checking. You could ask some of these people: Category:Iranian Wikipedians.

Thanks, -- LightningThrower (talk) 16:44, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Seems to be a general sense that there may be sources in Farsi. Relisting in case any can be found.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:41, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep. Nominating without proper research in farsi or other languages seems to be a clear violation of WP:DILIGENCE #1 Victor Zaak Saraiva (talk) 06:35, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

@Victor Zaak Saraiva What notability guideline does this pass? PARAKANYAA (talk) 06:59, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

I guess it remains to be seen whether this does not pass any notability guideline in the first place. We need better info before discussing this properly either way Victor Zaak Saraiva (talk) 07:55, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

There are 0 reliable, significant, independent sources. PARAKANYAA (talk) 08:12, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

We could be confident to claim that after proper research ~2026-42047-63 (talk) 10:10, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete No sig cov disclosed. Mme Maigret (talk) 08:42, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 09:53, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:51, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Vivek Kumar Birla

Vivek Kumar Birla (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mainly based on WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLP1E. Not salvageable as the person is WP:NPF with not enough ample amount of sources in vicinity around him, it was also cited with The Times of India which falls under WP:RSP, I don't thing the topic deserves a standalone page as of now. Naslmah (talk) 09:02, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, Politicians, Academic journals, Events, Law, Social science, Asia, India, and Uttar Pradesh. Naslmah (talk) 09:02, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep per WP:NPOL - he was a judge on a state (subnational) top court, the Allahabad High Court, which is the top court of the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 01:13, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep Meets WP:NPOL. A judge of an Indian High Court is presumed notable. TulsaPoliticsFan (talk) 05:16, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

List of John Cazale performances

List of John Cazale performances (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to John Cazale. Everything in the origin article seems to have been copy-pasted from the target article. Oakchris1955 (talk) 08:25, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Theatre. Oakchris1955 (talk) 08:25, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:23, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Oppose It's not true that "everything seems to have been copy-pasted". And there's a totally sufficient number of credits for Cazale - similar to the number in Stanley Kubrick filmography. By this standard, we should delete every filmography subarticle. ~ HAL333 13:04, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

  Every piece of information in the nominated article can be found in the John Cazale article and regarding the filmography and theatre credit tables, by running a quick `diff`, the only differences I spotted was the non-existence of references on the John Cazale article and a difference on the tables' parameters. Furthermore, regarding people with their own filmography subarticle, their articles tend not to duplicate information and the most common approach I have seen is to have an empty filmography section in the parent article that links to the filmography subarticle. Oakchris1955 (talk) 13:51, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Merge with John Cazale. These short credits tables can go in the main article. It's not something so extensive that it ought to be forked, like Laurence Olivier on stage and screen. -- Ssilvers (talk) 15:20, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Merge per WP:SHORTTEXT. Super short, just two tables. FaviFake (talk) 18:25, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Merge Article duplicates short tables that are in the parent article John Cazale, there's no reason for this to exist as WP:SPINOUT.—BrechtBro (talk) 22:06, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

USU (operating system)

USU (operating system) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Long-dead unremarkable Linux distribution which seems to have generated very little coverage. Daask (talk) 07:05, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Bulgaria. Daask (talk) 07:05, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Warren Pickering

Warren Pickering (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pickering isn’t an elected parliamentarian, he’s running as a candidate for a minor political party. I struggle to see how this meets Wikipedia’s notability guidelines as he’s not known for anything else of notability aside of his political candidacy. All reporting is just mentions of the guy because he 1, is a candidate running in the upcoming Victorian State Election and 2, is because he was appointed the leader of Victoria’s One Nation branch. Based on how Wikipedia defines notability - election candidacy alone doesn’t meet Wikipedia’s guidelines for notability. Leadership of a party (if the leader isn’t an elected official) doesn’t meet Wikipedia’s guidelines for notability. As such, in my view, this article should either be deleted or merged into a One Nation Victoria article (which would have notability). Geelongite (talk) 06:57, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of People-related AfD discussions. Geelongite (talk) 06:57, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Oppose/Keep. The Pickering article does not fail WP:GNG. Also, leaders for a sub-branches of One Nation exist as well. Take James Ashby for example. MrActiniuM ☢️talk 07:08, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

James Ashby has prominence outside of a political candidacy. Geelongite (talk) 08:46, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Military, and Australia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:16, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

I actually agree with AusLondonder. We shan't be doing these things just for our political stances. NPOV exists on Wikipedia and, again agreeing to @AusLondonder, this article meets WP:NPOL and the GNG for significant coverage. MrActiniuM ☢️talk 07:43, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Oppose I might have leaned towards deleting had One Nation still be a fringe party but its disingenuous to represent them now as just a minor party when they have consistently been polling in the mid 20's for some time now, there is significant media coverage on him currently as well, he is probably only going to grow in notability as the state election nears, i also want to note that he is presumably the first actual Victorian state leader since the 1998, indicating One Nation cementing its status as a player in Victorian State politics

My only other comment is that if this article is deleted, then the important information on Pickering here should be moved to a new One Nation Victoria page as was brought up Auspol4 (talk) 13:05, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

cper nom. Fails NPOL and otherwise does not pass GNG. PA Uploader (talk) 12:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Comment Zero military notability. Intothatdarkness 18:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Pinging article editors @AusLondonder @Ponyshine @Auspol4 @HiLo48 @Moondragon21 MrActiniuM ☢️talk 21:48, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Oppose/Keep but need to clean up. I view his notability as being an operator in that far right conspiracy/agitator void, similar to Avi Yemeni. But his notability is in spreading conspiracies far more than political candidacy (less alone military service). Ponyshine (talk) 22:06, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep Deletion nomination is based on a misrepresentation of WP:NPOL. An individual not meeting NPOL does not demonstrate that they're not notable. NPOL states: "Just being an elected local official, an official in a state/province-wide political party, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the general notability guideline. Describing One Nation as a minor party when they're leading the polls nationally (and in some cases in Victoria) is rather misleading. We do our readers a disservice by refusing to cover topics of interest to them in a neutral, unbiased way because we may disagree with someone's politics. AusLondonder (talk) 23:08, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete This bloke's ONLY notability is that he is the person chosen by Pauline to be One Nation Leader in Victoria. Thta's not enough. HiLo48 (talk) 04:06, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Jose Lopez Manzano Tuy National High School

Jose Lopez Manzano Tuy National High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Scoria (talk) 06:10, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Philippines. Scoria (talk) 06:10, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• redirect to Tuy, Batangas as per WP:ATD --Lenticel ^(talk) 21:26, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

What Do You Call It? From Grassroots to the Golden Era of UK Rap

What Do You Call It? From Grassroots to the Golden Era of UK Rap (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In addition to the LLM issues, there are no sources present that help this pass WP:NBOOK. There are questionably reliable interviews and nothing else; interviews can be helpful to build out an article but do not help notability unless there is substantial independent content in the piece, which is not the case here. A search found no other sources that are all 3 of independent, significant coverage, and reliable. PARAKANYAA (talk) 17:45, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Literature. PARAKANYAA (talk) 17:45, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Suspected AI-generated articles, and United Kingdom. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:40, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

hi, thank you for your note. In addition to the The Times newspaper reference, and Crack magazine end of year list refrenced. The book was subject to at least two independent reviews from note worthy print magazines. Would proof of those reviews help? ~2026-41850-33 (talk) 07:03, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Those sources are interviews or do not have sigcov on the book.

What reviews? Are they from reliable sources? PARAKANYAA (talk) 07:16, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Comment Right now, I’m not seeing enough here to count these as proper reviews. The wire and mojo citations are missing page numbers and do not show any details how much coverage there was. The wax poetics one is even shakier and may just be a blurb. Until someone provides fuller citations or copies, I would not use them for WP:NBOOK. Charlie Zachary Allen Roth (talk) 15:41, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 19:00, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: With the reviews, keep in mind that sourcing doesn't have to be on the internet to establish notability - it just has to be verifiable. In other words, in this situation we often have to assume that the reviews are of a proper length unless we have evidence to the contrary (ie, magazine doesn't do reviews, they only do capsules, etc). So rather than address the potential length of the reviews, the better option would be to look at if the outlets themselves are reliable or not. That said, it would also be very good to have page numbers for these reviews if that is available. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:44, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:20, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Comment The review in The Wire (paywalled but partly visible in their issue reader) is a full column long, and does say what the article claims (although I'm not sure the author's name is right?). Mojo would also be an RS if someone can check it and fill out the ref properly. I'm unsure about Wax Poetics; the current incarnation doesn't look much like an RS. Adam Sampson (talk) 15:37, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Tahir Reid-Brown

Tahir Reid-Brown (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose draftifying because the article does not have non-primary sources that go in-depth about the player. The article was moved the article to mainspace a long time ago when I was a much less experienced editor after I submitted it, but then moved it back to draft. Recently, the article was moved to mainspace, and I inquired why, but I was given no explanation as to how it met WP:SPORTSIGCOV now. Perhaps I am being too harsh to an article I started myself, but I just don't see the player meeting notability guidelines yet. The player is young, and the article would continue to be worked on as a draft until the player received sufficient coverage, or until it became clear that the player would more than likely not achieve that. Raskuly 🐰 15:09, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Florida. Raskuly 🐰 15:09, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 19:28, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
• Drafify - not currently notable, but might be in future. GiantSnowman 19:29, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep, the kid has almost 80 pro caps and significant coverage. I'm seeing coverage on NY Times, Field Level Media, and the ManeLand. Plus all types of coverage on his national team and club matches.--Ortizesp (talk) 18:15, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

  Source one is routine.

  The entire entry: Orlando City has completed the signing of homegrown defender Tahir Reid-Brown, the club announced on Tuesday.

  Reid-Brown, 17, made three appearances at the U-17 World Cup with the United States. He has made 16 appearances with Orlando City’s second team in MLS Next Pro over the last two years and was named a 2023 MLS Next All-Star.

  Source two is routine and about the signing. What is more routine than reporting on a signing?

  Source three is a fan site for Orlando City, which does not help to establish notability.

  Regarding the all types of coverage, you'll have to give specific examples because all I see is routine and not independent. Raskuly 🐰 23:02, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

  Which is why we routinely keep players who have nine caps in a single season in the top leagues in the world, @Raskuly! ROUTINE tells us that such sources shouldn't be the entire basis of an article, but it isn't, as there's a score of other references that much of the article is built on. Nfitz (talk) 02:24, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

  Thank you I guess for writing that the article is well-sourced, but how exactly does that factor into Reid-Brown meeting WP:SPORTSIGCOV? I'm very familiar with the sources in the article, I added them all, but none of that do that. There is also no mention of making an appearance in a top flight guaranteeing notability. That was an old guideline, but it's scrapped now. If there are deletion discussions being closed as keep that way, there is a significant misunderstanding of the notability guidelines. Raskuly 🐰 02:39, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

• Draftify, agreed with Raskuly that zero sources support GNG currently. JoelleJay (talk) 12:05, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 19:01, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: We could do with a little more input
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Draftify I agree that this player currently isn't notable but may become notable in the future. Opm581 ^{(talk | he/him)} 10:26, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Keep NYT reference looks good. Nine appearances in last few months in a top league in the world. National team appearances at U17 and U20 level. There's other media mentions, such as his name in an Orlando Sentinental headline a couple of years ago ProQuest 2937351843, along with many, many mentions in that paper. Nfitz (talk) 02:43, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

  The NYT source is one brief mention in a updating article about MLS transfers and I write this with exaggeration, but it is like 1% about Reid-Brown. The Orlando Sentinel source that you linked through ProQuest says this in full about Reid-Brown:

  Tahir Reid-Brown

  Age/Ht: 17/6-2

  Citizenship: United States

  The buzz: Signed to a homegrown contract in January, Reid-Brown helped Orlando City B make the MLS NEXT Pro playoffs in 2023 and wants to continue that momentum. He is unlikely to feature often for Orlando City but should continue to develop with Orlando City B with aims to make his first-team debut this year.

  This comes from a list of every single player on the Orlando City roster at the start of the 2024 Orlando City SC season. Are you implying that simply being signed to the roster means Reid-Brown is notable? News report these things all the time for sports. Routine signing announcements and roster lists don't show notability. How does any of this rise above Trivial coverage and routine game coverage? This all clearly WP:ROUTINE. And again, there is absolutely no mention of making appearances in a top flight or on youth national teams meaning that the subject is notable under the current sports notability guidelines. Raskuly 🐰 03:44, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

  Okay, that one is poor looking at it in Newspapers.com, and obviously it doesn't mention his caps back when he was signed. But they frequently mention him. It seems unlikely that people won't be looking him up. It's bog standards to have articles for regular first team players in top leagues. Nfitz (talk) 03:55, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

  Reid-Brown isn't a regular first team player (not that is necessarily relevant, coverage mostly is, but it is also probably why he hasn't gotten sufficient coverage yet). His last appearance for Orlando City was a one-minute cameo for them in the 2026 U.S. Open Cup back in April against the New England Revolution. If you mean regular first team player as in making the bench, then yeah, I suppose, but the coverage is still what matters most. If you look at Newspapers.com, there are 111 results. Filtering out those which are actually about him, the majority of them are about him signing in 2024. There are also a few about him having an injured left thigh and being unable to play, but these are again routine because they're mentioning every single unavailable player on the roster and don't go in-depth about it. The best source I saw was this piece from the Orlando Sentinel which is ahead of their match in the U.S. Open Cup against FC Naples in which Reid-Brown was mentioned once as a potential participant in the game in which the author wrote that the game was a good opportunity to rotate and bring in players from Orlando City B. Raskuly 🐰 04:19, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

2002 Qasim Nagar massacre

2002 Qasim Nagar massacre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

For an event to exist on Wikipedia, it must pass WP:NEVENT, which this does not. Google Books shows three pages of results, but most of these are not from reliable sources. This is because the author is often not specializing is any relevant field and the publisher is not reputable. Google Scholar shows 2 results, one of which is a wiki (self-described) and the other is an inaccessible citation. Google News shows some coverage shortly after the event. Then, most of the other coverage is not WP:SIGCOV, except for which is not from a reputable media outlet. Relevant concerns from the NEVENT page are WP:LASTING, WP:GEOSCOPE (local to Kashmir), WP:CASESTUDY, WP:ROUTINE (terrorist attacks in Kashmir are very, common compared to other regions) and WP:DIVERSE (only news sources) HerrHeulsuse (talk) 11:13, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Islam, Pakistan, India, and Jammu and Kashmir. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 11:13, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and Events. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:22, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep The article already has several citations from both local and international outlets, including The Independent' (UK) and Voice of America (US), which challenges the WP:GEOSCOPE concern raised above. Also, a quick search found additional coverage not yet cited, including articles in The Guardian,"Massacre in Kashmir slum renews fear of war"] and BBC News, "Kashmir killings condemned"]. The frequency of Kashmir insurgency attacks doesn't make this one non-notable. And WP:ROUTINE typically refers to scheduled, everyday coverage like weddings or baseball games, not a massacre. SupermarketCake (talk) 03:19, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

WP:NEVENT says

"Many events receive coverage in the news and yet are not of historic or lasting importance. News organizations have criteria for content, i.e.

news values

, that differ from the criteria used by Wikipedia and encyclopedias. A violent crime, accidental death, or other media event may be interesting enough to reporters and news editors to justify coverage, but this will not always translate into sufficient notability for a Wikipedia article."

HerrHeulsuse (talk) 10:30, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

Re: Significance, this attack appears on a U.S. Department of State list titled Chronology of Significant Terrorist Incidents, 2002. SupermarketCake (talk) 21:07, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

I'm inclined to think this is just a news story with no sustained secondary coverage. I tried to find a suitable merge target, but this is just isn't significant to any broader subject. Does the Qasim Nagar neighborhood have significant coverage besides a one-off event? If not, I'll support deleting or redirecting to List of terrorist incidents in Jammu and Kashmir. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 05:15, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

It probably does, in Kashmiri or another South Asian language, but we would need editors to work on it. I think that if we merge and redirect to your suggested page, then the history will be available to merge into a Qasim Nagar page if it is later created. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 10:29, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

Regardless of what ends up happening to the event article, I've created an article for the location since I was able to find some coverage in Hindi and Urdu. It's barebones, especially because I was restrained in what information I grabbed from the sources, since I was reading them through machine translation. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 20:22, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:59, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 20:46, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep I added this as a reply above, since it was directly related to a reply from the nom, but am also posting here for the latest discussion.

Re: Significance, this attack appears on a U.S. Department of State list, aptly titled Chronology of Significant Terrorist Incidents, 2002.

Adding this: In reference to @Thebiguglyalien's comment on sustained secondary coverage, I'll agree that coverage is limited to 'lists of past attacks', (Times of India), passing mentions or remembrance articles from local outlets. However, the initial coverage was substantial and international (The Independent, VOA, Guardian, BBC, plus Tribune reporting and the above State Dept listing), which I'd argue meets WP:GNG on its own. SupermarketCake (talk) 21:47, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

WP:NEVENT:

• "a burst or spike of news reports does not automatically make an incident notable"
• "A violent crime, accidental death, or other media event may be interesting enough to reporters and news editors to justify coverage, but this will not always translate into sufficient notability for a Wikipedia article."

Being included in a U.S. Department list is not worth anything HerrHeulsuse (talk) 10:35, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

The key word in the list title is "significant". There seems to be a lot of effort to delete this article, but WP:DINC. SupermarketCake (talk) 18:04, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Firstly, it seems like you have voted twice as you bolded your vote twice. You should change one to "Comment".

Secondly, citing DINC makes it seem like this article can exist at all. But on what basis? A couple of contemporary news reports? That isn't for an encyclopedia page per the guidelines that I cite and that you ignore. But even ignoring them, what purpose does the page serve if no scholars analyse it? It is practically just trivia. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 19:37, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: This article does pass WP:EVENT, the massacre was not a shock news WP:LASTING, and received extended and continued coverage WP:INDEPTH by reliable and independent news agencies. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 05:24, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there no suitable merge target ? From the discussion the courage isn't lasting so it's fails NEVENT but there isn't quite enough of a consensus to close it. More input or an ATD would be useful
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:02, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Student Book of the Year

Student Book of the Year (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to pass WP:GNG. PARAKANYAA (talk) 17:49, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Iran. PARAKANYAA (talk) 17:49, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Awards-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:39, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 21:04, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep This event has been taking place for more than thirty years. We can see ongoing coverage by reliable sources including Tehran Times, ISNA, IRNA, Fararu, SNN, IBNA, and YJC. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 19:35, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

  None of that coverage seems WP:SIGNIFICANT, it is all short press release type material, interviews or recaps of speeches. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:39, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

  None of them are press releases. They are all authentic coverage. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 07:40, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

  I said "press release type", aka churnalism. The first piece is a good example of this. It's all just listings of who they declared won the award, interviews, or speech recaps. PARAKANYAA (talk) 07:48, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

  What else can be said about a reward event? Ali Pirhayati (talk) 07:48, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

  Plenty? The history, the origins, who established it, how it is funded, how it is decided, what the reception to the reward is, significant coverage is what would make it notable. Compare the National Book Award. Simple copying of their lists is not independent or sigcov. PARAKANYAA (talk) 07:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

  WP:GNG does not say anything about the content of coverage. Coverage should be significant (means not trivial), independent and reliable. That's enough. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 07:52, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

  It says it must be 1. significant 2. reliable 3. independent. Simply copying the lists they created is not independent or significant, WP:INTERVIEWS and speech recaps are also not independent. PARAKANYAA (talk) 08:09, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

  Evidently this is a misunderstanding about "independent" and "significant". "Independent" means the news agency should not be affiliatedto the topic. "significant" means the coverage should not be "trivial"; it should be directly and in detail. It doesn't have anything to do with the content of the coverage. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 08:31, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

  A transcript of a speech from the people who run the award or an WP:INTERVIEW with them is not WP:INDEPENDENT. Copying the list they sent out is not secondary or independent coverage. PARAKANYAA (talk) 08:38, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

  Another misunderstanding. First, I can send here dozens of links about the reward which are not interviews. Second, the function of interviews regarding notability depends on the interviewee and interviewer. Clearly, an interview with an independent publisher about the rewards counts toward notability. Third, There is not even one mention of "copy" in the GNG text. :)) Ali Pirhayati (talk) 08:53, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

  If you have sources that are clearly 1. reliable 2. significant 3. independent coverage, then by all means send them.

  "Clearly, an interview with an independent publisher about the rewards counts toward notability", no, it would not, unless there was significant material in there that was not the interviewee's own words - in which case we can just ignore the quoted material and count that towards sigcov.

  If a source simply copies another source, the material that it did not make does not somehow become independent or more reliable by virtue of being copied. The reliability is from its origin. PARAKANYAA (talk) 09:13, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

  This is mere repetition. Again you are talking about copying. The Oscar awards are also copied in all news agencies. Does it mean they are not notable? no. The interview is an independent source (by an independent publisher) about the awards. Then it counts. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 10:10, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

  If somehow the only source the Oscars had ever gotten were sources copying their awards lists with no commentary then no, they would not be notable.

  Being repeated by another source does not make it new or independent coverage. PARAKANYAA (talk) 10:11, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

  Only the award list is repeated. There is no repetition in the other parts of the text. But again, there is no mention of copying or repetition in GNG. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 11:14, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

  Why would a source repeating another source change anything about it? PARAKANYAA (talk) 11:26, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

  Read my reply again. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 14:10, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

  Read WP:Reliable sources. PARAKANYAA (talk) 18:48, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

  What does it have to do with reliability!!!? Agencies like ISNA and IRNA are not reliable? Ali Pirhayati (talk) 08:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

  A source reprinting another source does not make it from that source; it's reliable for the fact that they said these things but it would not make it independent or the information itself any more reliable. Also the ISNA source you linked is not sigcov it is a photo set. The IRNA source is literally just a transcript of a speech and then the list they made. PARAKANYAA (talk) 08:35, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

  I have replied to all these irrelevant comments. This is the coverage by IRNA. What else can you say? Ali Pirhayati (talk) 09:05, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

  And what of that is significant coverage, and not merely WP:ROUTINE speech transcripts? PARAKANYAA (talk) 09:06, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

  Oh, you examined all those links in one minute! I have nothing to say. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 09:08, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

  Of the first page, the 1st. is the same, the second is a tag, not an article, the rest are all routine press releases asking for submissions to the festival (e.g. , or are yet more speech transcripts. Another is just a tag again. This one mentions it only in passing in an article about children not enjoying reading. These are not significant or independent pieces of coverage. PARAKANYAA (talk) 09:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

  Please inquire about the meanings of "independent" and "significant" in Wikipedia. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 10:25, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Further source analysis would help.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 04:56, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Ithbat al-wasiyya (book)

Ithbat al-wasiyya (book) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. Jerod Lycett (talk) 08:38, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related AfD discussions. Jerod Lycett (talk) 08:38, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related AfD discussions. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 08:50, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

There are a lot of mentions of this in English and French RS but I can't find any sigcov. It seems like the kind of thing there should be sigcov of but the language barrier makes it hard to find. PARAKANYAA (talk) 17:05, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 20:02, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Delete: The article primarily cites the book itself which doesn't show notability. abandeali (talk) 20:21, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 21:08, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep and improve. There are scholarly secondary sources on this book.

https://sites.dlib.nyu.edu/viewer/books/princeton_aco001271/1

https://shiapen.com/comprehensive/the-life-and-times-of-lady-narjis-sa/the-birth-in-the-sacred-house/

It is also unclear how much we can find about this in arabic-language sources, it's worth a look. Entychologist (talk) 21:19, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

I don't follow how either source helps us with notability. NYU has a physical scan of the book but has no commentary or review to establish the importance of the book. The second source doesn't seem like a neutral scholarly resource. The about page says "Our sole goal is to refute the false propaganda against Shia and the teachings of Islam.". Even if it was a valid source, I don't see how that article helps with notability. abandeali (talk) 00:07, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep and improve like User:Entychologist said.

Google scholar shows many sources which I can't access, but they appear to reference the book. Some even (based off of their titles) appear to talk about the book in greater detail than a passing reference. I also think that Arabic sources should be checked.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Exceptional relist as sources came in very late. Need a little more input on them. By the way keep and improve is a meaningless vote
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 04:45, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep Masudi is a major historian whose works are the subject of constant debate and scholarship. I searched for “ اثبات الوصية المسعودي” in a general google search which only brought up library catalogues and discussion forums, but a books search of the same term (here) shows that it is discussed or referred to by many other works. Without spending a very large amount of time ploughing through these unfamiliar texts in Arabic or in Farsi (which I can’t read anyway) I can’t say more but it’s pretty clear to me that the book is notable. Mccapra (talk) 06:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Government Autonomous College, Rourkela

Government Autonomous College, Rourkela (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:20, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Odisha. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:00, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Education-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:32, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per this this and this and this. Appears to be good enough to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 01:16, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
• Keep as it passes WP:NSCHOOL as per the sources found by User:BhikhariInformer‬. The article required an update not deletion. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 05:27, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, EmilyR34 (talk) 04:10, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

SomethingAboutChickens

SomethingAboutChickens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. All citations are primary: IMDb (unreliable per WP:IMDB), YouTube (unreliable per WP:RSPYT), and Wikipedia itself (circular, never a valid source). Lone Wolf ^howl 14:33, 26 July 2026 (UTC) struck confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:59, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of People-related AfD discussions. Lone Wolf ^howl 14:33, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: Additional sources found when searching Google News for "Darrell Moten" and "SomethingAboutChickens": Business Insider (2022), Cinema Blend/Yahoo (2026), NBC (2026). The coverage from AGT is obviously new and may not be long-term. From my search, I'm not sure there's enough about him pre-AGT. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:49, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

  For what it's worth, the NBC article, at least, would not be independent sourcing in this case, as NBC is the network that broadcasts AGT–and in any event isn't even from NBC News, but from "NBC Insider" on nbc.com, which exists solely to promote programming aired on NBC or other NBCUniversal platforms. (No opinion or comment on anything else.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:39, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:20, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Magic, Television, and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:35, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 22:17, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Only 1 source meets WP:SIGCOV (the Business Insider Article mentioned by Significa liberdade), otherwise coverage is not WP:SUSTAINED. Further later coverage outside of AGT and the BI profile may warrant an article, but not now. UppercutPawnch (talk) 06:57, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete as the sourcing is weak and most of the source do not adhere to WP:RSP policy. Farhanansari1994 (talk) 13:10, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 03:26, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Fahrdorf massacre

Fahrdorf massacre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested draftification, so taking to AfD as advised by an admin. The topic of this article fails WP:GNG and WP:NEVENT due to a lack of WP:SUSTAINED coverage. There are no sources from after the crime took place in 1970 to show that it was notable or had lasting impact. Possible redirect to List of mass shootings in Germany where it is already listed. MidnightMayhem (talk) 23:25, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and Germany. MidnightMayhem (talk) 23:27, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• I'd also like to note that another version of this article using the same sources was closed as merge in a December 2025 AfD. MidnightMayhem (talk) 23:48, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

  It was closed as merge and then against that merge consensus removed from that article by a different editor because it "wasn't notable" (which doesn't apply to article contents). PARAKANYAA (talk) 06:23, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

  I do agree that this does not pass NEVENT. However, I do think this is a documented historical event that is due weight to mention on the article of the tiny town where it occurred. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:37, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Events-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:02, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete as completely WP:ROUTINE coverage. Khalitate (talk) 05:21, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 03:26, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Baboucarr Savage

Baboucarr Savage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Topic appears not to meet WP:GNG. Sources do not provide significant coverage. Page creator challenged PROD due to this footballer having played international football, but GNG still applies and did not advance any policy-based reason for keeping. C679 03:13, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and The Gambia. C679 03:13, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. C679 03:13, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

I'm inclined to agree, but have just had one of my own PRODS, for a similarly unreferenced article on a footballer with two international caps, reverted solely because of his international status (Abdoulaye Kapi Sylla). Is there a consistent metric here on whether international caps are a mitigating factor, as it were? Haz215 (talk) 04:01, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Comment International caps are ignored after WP:NFOOTBALL was scrapped in 2022. Removing a PROD based on someone having being capped internationally was wrong. Dougal18 (talk) 09:26, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Comment Thanks Dougal, that's helpful to know. I'll let the remover know. Haz215 (talk) 09:35, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Comment - A player has been capped internationally. That makes them notable. I can't see how that can be denied. And I certainly can't find anywhere within that guideline that outlines that. If the problem is with sourcing, then seek assistance with finding sources. The nominator claims that "other editors" (plural) have stated this. Bobo. 10:10, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

  Comment The problem isn't with sourcing. I'm referring to what Dougal's said above, and to discussions on the same topic that I've seen in deletion threads in the past, where this has also been mentioned. Do you believe that Dougal is incorrect?

  I'd also like to politely ask you to remember to AGF, as you're claiming that my issue is with sourcing, which it isn't, and appearing to be quite chippy in manner. Haz215 (talk) 10:40, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

  Really? Even though the changes to the guideline have been pointed out to you directly multiple times? JoelleJay (talk) 19:09, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

  Comment Hi Joelle, is that a reply to me or Bobo? My laptop's playing up and formatting some replies in the incorrect order! I haven't had the changes to the guideline pointed out to me multiple times, for the record. Haz215 (talk) 20:00, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

  Comment - It was probably to me. I haven't touched football articles for many years. If the nominator has a problem with sourcing, AfD is not the place to bring it up. Bobo. 21:39, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

  Comment - I am the nominator. Not sure that Bobo, above, was directly quoting me. I have no problem with the PROD being contested due to the individual being an international footballer. Now though we are at Afd, where nobody so far has advanced a policy-based reason to keep the article. C679 07:36, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

  Comment. I apologize. I misread and misinterpreted a comment that must have been left elsewhere. Bobo. 10:08, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete – Per lack of WP:SIGCOV. Svartner (talk) 14:54, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:05, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Aberdeen, Medina County, Texas

Aberdeen, Medina County, Texas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any significant coverage in reliable independent sources - or in fact any evidence that it existed other than the few sentences in one many's journal. This was not a legally recognized place, so it does not meet the presumption of notability under WP:GEOLAND. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:26, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Texas. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:26, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. See History of Aberdeen links on The History of the Rocking Chair Ranche Company: A Cattle Legacy in Texas. [History of Aberdeen, Medina County: A Glimpse into the Past]. A bibliography is provided there. Much, if not most, most Texas history is like this. — Maile (talk) 14:55, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

  @Maile66: I assume you intended to link this article and this article. The first only mentions Aberdeen in a few sentences; the second is only a few sentences long. That's really not enough to qualify as significant coverage. I'm open to being convinced if there's anything in those bibliographies with more coverage, but what we have so far is not enough to pass GNG.

  It does appear that we have an article about the ranch company that's a plausible redirect/merge target. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:29, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

Yes, you are correct in my attempted linking — Maile (talk)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:07, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

@Pi.1415926535, what did you mean by "one many's journal"? SenshiSun (talk) 02:32, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

@SenshiSun: That should have been "one man's journal". The only source in the article is a single paragraph based on a mention in someone's journal. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:07, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks! Sorry for the disruption. SenshiSun (talk) 03:54, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 20:46, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Axolitl (talk | contribs) 02:52, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Nebish Benson

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Nebish Benson
• Articles for deletion/Nebish Benson (2nd nomination)

Nebish Benson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject only played minor roles as child artist movies. Fails GNG and NACTOR because of no mjaor roles in multiple productions. Thilsebatti (talk) 05:01, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, India, and Kerala. Thilsebatti (talk) 05:01, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: I suspect this is the same subject as the first nomination from 2017, which ended in deletion. This iteration probably should have come to AfD much sooner than it did: it has been tagged as a poorly-sourced potential NBIO failure almost since its recreation in November 2023, was briefly tagged for PROD for two minutes in May 2024 before the proposer saw the big red text announcing the previous AfD's existence and self-reverted (but did not follow up with a second AfD or anything else), and based on the logs was only just returned to NPP this week after its initial 2024 review was vacated. No opinion on the article itself, but the signs–and the UPE blocks on both the 2024 reviewer and the article creator–certainly aren't encouraging (and that, combined with a G4 deletion not too long after the 2017 AfD, might mean that the salt shouldn't be taken off the table either). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:16, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete and salt, no sign of the subject passing GNG or NACTOR, and as per Wcquidditch above analysis very likely paid editing was underway. Cavarrone 04:44, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 20:55, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Axolitl (talk | contribs) 02:49, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete and salt. Evidence for a UPE farm seems pretty strong. If evidence for notability emerges, article can be reconsidered at that time. M kuhner (talk) 04:03, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Zaka Mirzayev

Zaka Mirzayev (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article lacking in-depth secondary source coverage to meet WP:NBIO. Yousiphh (talk) 15:43, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Azerbaijan. Yousiphh (talk) 15:43, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 21:04, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Axolitl (talk | contribs) 02:48, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

International Workers' League (Belgium)

International Workers' League (Belgium) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article about a fringe Belgian political party was created as an unsourced, single-sentence stub back in 2007 and has existed in a more or less unchanged state for nearly two decades. I couldn't find anything about it on a cursory Google Scholar search, neither for its Dutch nor French names, and searching for the English name only brought up false positives. As the party does not appear to meet our notability guidelines for organisations, I'm nominating this article for deletion. Grnrchst (talk) 18:27, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, Social science, and Belgium. Grnrchst (talk) 18:27, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 21:04, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete. (But with admiration for its tenacity, that's a long lifespan for an article of this kind!) M kuhner (talk) 21:39, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Axolitl (talk | contribs) 02:47, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Christina Angela Ntulo

Christina Angela Ntulo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose draftifying or deleting this because I do not see a clear WP:NBIO/WP:BASIC or WP:GNG pass. The subject is verifiable and has held NGO/mental-health roles, but the sourcing is mostly organizational profiles, affiliated/primary pages, press-release republications, conference material, and routine mentions, with little significant independent coverage of Ntulo herself. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:40, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Health and fitness, and Uganda. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:40, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Women-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:41, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 19:21, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 21:05, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Draftify If the article could be strengthened, it could be worth keeping. I searched for her without her middle name and found two more sources, but neither strengthens the independent coverage req for WP:GNG: 1) A 2011 NPR article (independent, but it's just a quote from her) and 2) A WHO Africa Q&A with her. SupermarketCake (talk) 20:48, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Axolitl (talk | contribs) 02:46, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Hermes Bautista

Hermes Bautista (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. No notability outside Pinoy Big Brother and one article about winning a pageant. Handsome Ellis (talk) 19:43, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Philippines. Shellwood (talk) 19:44, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 July 26. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:59, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of California-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:51, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Television-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:31, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 21:08, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Fierysea13 (talk) 22:21, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Axolitl (talk | contribs) 02:45, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

. Delete per nom. Haz215 (talk) 03:13, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Shine Group of Institutions

Shine Group of Institutions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:25, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete as it fails WP:NSCHOOL. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 06:01, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Jharkhand. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: Just another MILL institute. Additional searches didn't yield anything with SIGCOV to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 03:55, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Kumardubi Darkhuli High School

Kumardubi Darkhuli High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete as it lacks notability to qualify for WP:NSCHOOL. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 06:04, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Jharkhand. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect to Baharagora#Education, where it's listed, as an ATD-R. Another MILL school. Not even near meeting any notability guidelines. Additional searches didn't yield anything useful. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 03:57, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Hindu Vidya Peeth

Hindu Vidya Peeth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:14, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete as it fails WP:NSCHOOL. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 06:07, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Haryana. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: Additional searches didn't yield anything with SIGCOV to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 04:01, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Kate Egan

Kate Egan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:JOURNALIST. Could not find significant coverage of this individual. LibStar (talk) 02:10, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Journalism, and Ireland. LibStar (talk) 02:10, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Similar to the nominator, I can't find coverage of journalist as a topic/subject in own right. Apart from wedding coverage. Which doesn't constitute WP:SIGCOV on its own. As I can't find sufficient coverage to expand this title beyond a sub-stub (as it has been for 6 years), I don't see how WP:GNG is met. At a stretch, the title could perhaps be redirected to RTÉ News or similar. Can't see how there's sufficient sources to support a standalone title... Guliolopez (talk) 13:34, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

  Thanks. Kate Egan is a fairly common name so I'd oppose redirect in this instance. LibStar (talk) 23:05, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Leading Angel Public School, Hisar

Leading Angel Public School, Hisar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:10, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete as per User talk:Filmssssssssssss.Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 06:12, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Haryana. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: Found nothing with SIGCOV in additional searches to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 04:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

CAV High School

CAV High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails [WP;GNG]] and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:06, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep according to source . The school has some notability. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 06:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Haryana. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:20, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: Only the first source cited by Dz5t 8O12 counts towards GNG. The second source carries just a single line - "He also played a key role in opening and managing Chandulal Anglo Vedic School and Arya Pathshala for Girls at Hisar." — this definitely doesn't count as SIGCOV. Ergo, just one source ain't enough to save the page. Ping me if more sources are found. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 04:15, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Baba Banda Bahadur Public School, Rohtak

Baba Banda Bahadur Public School, Rohtak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:05, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete as per User talk:Filmssssssssssss. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 06:20, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Haryana. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:20, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: Additional searches didn't yield anything with SIGCOV to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 05:34, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

2 Die 4 (novel)

2 Die 4 (novel) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I recently closed an RM concerning this article in which an editor proposed merging it to Nigel Hinton. No opinion on this merge myself. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 02:03, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Arts, and Fictional elements. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 02:03, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Comment: This is the RM. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 02:04, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete. I don't see how to merge: Nigel Hinton lists the author's works but does not describe each one, so where would the additional material go? I was not able to find non-user-generated reviews of this book, so the article shouldn't stand, but the merge does not make sense to me either. Redirection is problematic as several things share this name, though I guess a disambiguation page would be possible. Happy to change my !vote if someone can explain how the merge would work. M kuhner (talk) 04:11, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:21, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Redirect, it's not like a redirect would cause problems as it is not the primary topic. PARAKANYAA (talk) 08:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Redirect if I have to decide. I cannot see the sense in merging it but I do not have any strong feelings over whether it should be deleted or not. I created this article before I knew about the policy on notability and since then, Wikipedia became more strict on the creation of new articles. This made me feel less confident about creating new articles feeling all the notable topics are already covered and decided to instead focus on improving existing articles although I have since created redirects and at least one disambiguation page. Tk420 (talk) 20:01, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Napasai

Napasai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable hotel. Review of article creator's contributions shows they are almost all related to Belmond-branded hotels and properties, making it likely that it was the result of undisclosed paid editing. Risker (talk) 01:53, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Travel and tourism-related AfD discussions. Risker (talk) 01:53, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete unable to find suitable sourcing and nothing to indicate it warrants a merger. Due to its series of names over the property's history, it does not appear a redirect would be helpful to the reader. Star Mississippi 02:36, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:22, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features)#Engineered constructs says:

  Buildings, including private residences, transportation facilities and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability.

  Sources

  1. Jackson, Gina (2025-01-24). "Escape to Napasai, A Belmond Hotel for The White Lotus treatment minus the crowds". The Standard. Factiva NSONL00020250124el1o0010k. Archived from the original on 2026-08-10. Retrieved 2026-08-10.

     The review notes: "For a super-luxe stay (with all of the cheer, and none of the tears), check into Belmond Napasai, a tranquil retreat perched along Koh Samui’s northern coast . This serene sleepover is secreted away from the island’s more tourist-trodden towns, ideal for getaways that revolve around sun, spa, and swim. ... The hotel straddles the island’s coveted northern coast, along a stretch of shore favoured by fanciful five-star resorts. It’s a leisurely 30-minute drive from Samui Airport, and a similar distance to the popular tourist spots of Bophut and Chaweng. On arrival, you’ll sweep through the rambling hotel farm, home to roaming chickens and water buffaloes, before passing through bountiful, blossoming gardens. Weathered teak walkways span out across the sprawling, 43-acre estate, unravelling in a series of open-air pavilions and foliage-framed salas. The resort spills down the sloping hillside towards the ocean, offering uninterrupted vistas of the sparkly, shifting blue waters from every vantage point."

  2. Cobaj, Lee (2024-11-01). "Belmond Napasai". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 2018-12-05. Retrieved 2026-08-10.

     The review notes: "Traditional Thai architecture combined with elegant tropical gardens give the Belmond Napasai a timeless air. A series of attractive teak salas, with curling rooftops, creamy stone floors and elegant Buddhist sculptures spill down the hillside towards the beach. ... The hotel has 67 villas, including nine one-bedroom villas, and 13 large Oceanfront Pool residences, ranging from one to four bedrooms. Only a few of the villas have private pools but all come with modest outdoor decks and dreamy sea views. Warm, welcoming interiors feature vaulted ceilings, teak floors, wood-panelled walls, porcelain lamps, tropical tapestries and rattan blinds, as well as bedside sockets and wireless speakers."

  3. Sugden, Rachael (2011-04-09). "Happy days in Land of Smiles; Thailand Rachael Sugden enjoys the best of Thai luxury in Bangkok and Koh Samui". Bristol Evening Post. Factiva FBEP000020110409e7490002t. Factiva FWDP000020110716e77g0005s.

     The review notes: "After our Bangkok luxury we spent 12 hours travelling south to Koh Samui, via an overnight sleeper train, bus and ferry, en route to Napasai, an Orient Express-owned resort on the island. ... Napasai is, quite simply, incredible. If you want somewhere special to mark one of life's milestones, or simply have the budget to splash out, the resort is faultless. Situated on the rocky north coast, Napasai is a world away from the island's overdeveloped tourist hotspots to the south and east. There is almost 20 acres of lush hillside grounds, filled with bougainvilla, palm trees and frangipani, and the resort has its own private sandy beach below a stunning infinity pool looking out to sea. The hotel complex has been developed in perfect harmony with its surroundings, with a series of low bungalow-style buildings. There are 55 guest cottages (no high-rise block of rooms here) spread along the shoreline and dotted up the hillside, plus separate bungalows, some open-sided to catch the breeze, housing the restaurant, reception and lobby bar and beach restaurant, with its tables stretching along the edge of the sand."

  4. Taemsamran, Jarunee (2004-06-24). "Hotels: A resort with a difference on Samui". Bangkok Post. Factiva BKPOST0020040624e06o00012.

     The article notes: "Built on 109 rai of hilly terrain, Pansea Napasai's 55 cottages are in a league of their own. The path leading to the cottages of Pansea Napasai Resort on Samui island snakes up and down mountain slopes. The resort's area is so large that it would take all your stamina to walk to the cottages built on hills. But don't worry, guests are serviced by a fleet of golf carts that commute within the resort. It's another newly-opened upmarket resort on Samui for those willing to shell out 10,000 baht for a night's stay to enjoy its privacy, luxury and optimum comfort in one of the most beautiful natural settings you can imagine. The resort opened its door to guests early this year but it was only recently that it celebrated its grand opening. Pansea Napasai comprises 55 cottages spread over 109 rai of hilly terrain. They are done in a mixture of modern, traditional Thai and Western-style architecture. Needless to to say about facilities and services, everything you can expect of a five-star property is available. The concept of Pansea Napasai is not entirely brand new but the story behind construction of the resort is certainly so. It was Mr Robert Molinari and Mr Stanislas Rollin, the co-founders and owners of Pansea Hotels & Resorts, who decided to buy the land on Maenam beach, a hilly side of the island. On Samui it's the beautiful beach with idyllic setting that normally attract investors."

  5. "Traditional Thai". South China Morning Post. 2004-11-02. Factiva SCMP000020041102e0b20001g. Archived from the original on 2026-08-10. Retrieved 2026-08-10.

     The article notes: "For guests who find comfort in familiarity, the recently opened Napasai on Koh Samui Island provides just that. The resort is traditional: village-style cottages arranged around a central pavilion that houses restaurants, a bar and a tree-shaded pool. Napasai is only 10 minutes from the island's airport, and is beautifully located on a hilltop overlooking the sea. Accommodation includes 11 beach-front cottages and another 34 with sea views. But the cream of the crop are the six spa cottages with personal therapists. The spa is also open to those not ensconced in a spa cottage."

  6. Swarbrick, Susan (2005-12-03). "Paradise regained An exclusive new resort allows Susan Swarbrick to enjoy the more sophisticated side of Thailand". The Herald. Factiva GH00000020051203e1c300004.

     The review notes: "To the north of the island, tucked away amid dense plantations of palm, cashew and coconut trees, lies Napasai. One of Koh Samui's newest arrivals, it neatly sidesteps the less attractive aspects of Thai life and encapsulates its beauty. Guests stay in secluded beach cottages and villas with a range of five-star facilities to hand, including two restaurants and a world-class spa. If the characters in Alex Garland's novel The Beach had stumbled across it in their search for utopia, they would have set up camp here instead. The in-house restaurants serve some of the best in Thai and French cuisine, and for the more adventurous there's also the opportunity to try recreating Thai dishes at the resort's cookery school. Under the watchful eye of chef Porn Sawan - also known as Alexander or Lec - we find ourselves attempting to master the art of Tom Kha Gai (chicken in coconut milk soup), Gang Kiew Warn Goong (prawn green curry with eggplant) and Gai Phad Med Mamuang Him Maparn (stir-fried chicken with cashew nuts and chilli)."

     The best beds in Koh Samui
  7. Ryan, Rob (2009-09-27). "Come on, everyone — back to Samui". The Sunday Times. Factiva ST00000020090927e59r000as.

     The review notes: "Best for peace and quiet. Napasai Where? On the north coast, sitting on its own small bay on Maenam beach. Why? My favourite resort on the island, with all accommodation in individual villas (hillside, beach or pool). It has a calm, low-key feel, with attentive but unobtrusive service, and a small beach with no hawkers or motorised sports. It feels remote, but it's just a 15-minute cab ride to the food/ massage/shopping scene at Fisherman's Village. But: the beach has a wide tidal range (a swimming jetty is under construction) and at the western end is a small Burmese fishing community. Some find the sound of their long-tail boats disturbing. Personally, I like them being there; their wading out to do battle for the fish with a pair of sea eagles provided a daily drama in an otherwise languid setting."

  8. "once you land in thailand, 
why would you want to leave?". The Saturday Star. 2019-03-30. Factiva SATST00020190330ef3u0000d.

     The review notes: "On my recent whirlwind trip, which was never going to be long enough, I spent a night at Belmond Napasai, on Koh Samui. ... As you arrive at Belmond Napasai, you might do a double take when you see the water buffalo grazing - more surrealism. You arrive at the main building, to be checked in with a bowl of coconut ice cream and a cool drink of water, after which you'll be escorted to your villa - one of 45 sitting between cashew and coconut groves, hibiscus and bougainvillea. Built on a slope stretching into the trees, you enter the villa up a short stairway with a very nifty "Do Not Disturb" device - a rope to close off the top of the stairs. A veranda is furnished with a table and chairs, with a view of the sea through the palm trees. Inside, teak furnishings, bamboo and traditional weavings bring the feel of nature."

  9. Less significant coverage:
     1. "Orient-Express gets SE Asia toehold with Pansea purchase". The Nation. 2006-07-12. Factiva THENAT0020060711e27c0000k. Factiva THAINS0020060712e27d0001c.

        The article notes: "Orient-Express Hotels Ltd last week announced that it was branching out to Southeast Asia with the acquisition of Thailand's Pansea hotel group for approximately $25 million (Bt950 million), The Nation reports. The transaction will be completed within the next four weeks, in advance of the high season, which starts in August. The Pansea deal comes on the heels of Orient-Express' May 25 announcement that it would acquire 50 per cent of the Napasai property in Koh Samui, which is not owned by Pansea. In total, inclusive of Napasai, Orient-Express is buying 271 rooms for about $140,000 apiece. ... The Napasai property on Koh Samui opened in February 2004. It's enjoying rapid growth and has significant potential for residential development, the company said. In Siem Reap, Cambodia, it owns the boutique hotel La Residence d'Angkor, located near Angkor Wat and surrounding temples."

     2. "Drop Everything Napasai Infinity Pool". The Herald. 2005-09-10. Factiva GH00000020050910e19a0002p.

        The article notes: "Hidden among palm, cashew and coconut trees lies this pocket of tranquillity on Koh Samui, Thailand. The Napasai Resort is one of the newest properties on the island, offering five-star facilities, a cookery school and a world-class spa. You can stay in either a secluded beach cottage or a villa with a private pool, and the islands of Koh Pha Ngan and Koh Tao are just a short boat trip away."

     3. Leahy, Kate (2014-02-23). "The best beds in Koh Samui". The Sunday Times. Factiva SUNDTI0020140224ea2o0005l.

        The article notes: "There’s a real old-fashioned charm to trad Thai Napasai: picture tapestries, bamboo blinds and orchids on pillows. The 55 stilted cottages and 14 pool villas are as lush as their jungly surrounds. Doubles from £160, B&B (00 66 7742 9200, napasai.com)."

     4. Niyamabha, Vipasai (2004-06-19). "Pansea's elegant return". The Nation. Factiva THENAT0020040618e06j0001b.

        The article notes: "The Pansea Napasai Resort and Spa, which opened on Koh Samui last week, is the company's fifth property in Asia and, despite the familiarity of its name, is still the only one in Thailand. ... Pansea Napasai features 55 luxury cottages in 'village' style, shaded by coconut palms and cashew trees. There are also the Villas: 14 two- to four-bedroom private residences for those seeking to become homeowners. All were designed by Habita of Thailand and Amedeo and Associes of France."

  There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Napasai Samui to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

  Cunard (talk) 07:24, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Sun River Valley

Sun River Valley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Sun River because the valley doesn't seem to have enough of a separate notability from the river itself to warrant a separate article. The Sun River article is longstanding, but lacking in the history section and could use the history section here. - TurquoiseGoose•they/them•(talk) 00:59, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Montana. - TurquoiseGoose•they/them•(talk) 00:59, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Merge - The article is short and has no need to be seperate Unknown Lifeform | Talk 01:48, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Merge per WP:SHORTTEXT. FaviFake (talk) 18:31, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Crimson Avenger (Lee Travis)

Crimson Avenger (Lee Travis) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Crimson Avenger because Lee Travis is the more well-known version of the character. While WP:GNG is not established on the page, he seemed to be a golden age figure with a former modest popularity that started the trend of masked avenger heroes in DC Comics and is frequently mentioned on a historical basis. So the merge should also have him the lead on the page. CosmicMordecai (talk) 00:54, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Comics and animation. CosmicMordecai (talk) 00:54, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Keep or merge with Crimson Avenger in the spirit of WP:ATD. First @Jhenderson777: merges it to Crimson Avenger and then @Toughpigs: undoes the merge. We should at least hear what they have to say about this as they have been pinged. --Rtkat3 (talk) 01:43, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to Crimson Avenger - As stated in the nom, this is the primary version of the character, and they are already fully covered on the main Crimson Avenger article. Essentially all of the information is already present on the target, so there is really no reason to have a duplicative article on this specific version separate from the main article that already contains all the same information on him. Rorshacma (talk) 14:55, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Keep or merge: but, like, a real merge that actually copies over the lead and the "Publication history" section, rather than a redirect and no other work. Toughpigs (talk) 04:15, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

U.S. Route 25 Business (Georgia–South Carolina)

U.S. Route 25 Business (Georgia–South Carolina) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to Special routes of U.S. Route 25#Augusta–North Augusta business loop because the subject appears to fail WP:GNG. I'm not having any luck finding any reliable, consistent, secondary sourcing for the subject that would suggest that it warrants its own dedicated article. The previous status quo of having it simply listed as an entry under Special routes of U.S. Route 25 seems perfectly adequate. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 00:48, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation, Georgia (U.S. state), and South Carolina. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 00:48, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Chikodinaka Perpetua Chima

Chikodinaka Perpetua Chima (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In short, I just don't see how WP:GNG is passed. A cursory search didn't yield useful findings. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 00:01, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Fashion, and Nigeria. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 00:01, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Women-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:23, 10 August 2026 (UTC)