Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Yesterday

if page isn't updating.

Guide to deletion

Hurricane Hilda tornado outbreak

Hurricane Hilda tornado outbreak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging because the main Hurricane Hilda article already covers tornadoes, but due to its short length, it could easily accommodate all of the information in the tables.

I am also nominating the following related articles:

1964 Larose tornado (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

I believe that the 1964 Larose tornado could fit into the Hilda article. It's also already mentioned in the main article. Given the limited content, I think the entire Larose tornado sub-section could be merged as well. Since it was the most notable tornado, I think it could retain having its own sub-section, like how it has its own infobox within the Hurricane Hilda tornado outbreak. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:17, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Weather-related AfD discussions. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:14, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Support both merges While the tornado outbreak (especially the F4) was quite impactful, I don't see a reason for two splits when the main Hurricane Hilda article is only 3,000 words. Lightbulb Noob (talk) 23:59, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Alabama, Louisiana, and North Carolina. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:01, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Premikudu

Premikudu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable reviews. All sources are about production only. Sources are all promotional tone and likely not independent either. Fails WP:NFILM. Redirect to Kaadhalan or List of Telugu films of 2016. DareshMohan (talk) 23:09, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. DareshMohan (talk) 23:09, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Delete Per nom. An editor from Mars (talk) 00:27, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Kate Hall (soap opera writer)

Kate Hall (soap opera writer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A BLP with limited refs (a dead link) and not sure how notable she is! Sirlink2222 (talk) 23:08, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Soft delete: without prejudice to re-creation once notability is asserted and verified. As presented this fails the criteria for a BLP. Absoluetly no references, and one dead external link. It comes from the wild west days here when quantity was valued over quality. Fails WP:V. May be rescued under WP:HEY. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 23:48, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, Television, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:02, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Valley View, Illinois

Valley View, Illinois (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is just a large neighborhood/subdivision of St. Charles, not a distinct community. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. –dlthewave ☎ 23:00, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Illinois. –dlthewave ☎ 23:00, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Wildwood, Illinois

Wildwood, Illinois (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be a subdivision to the West of Gages Lake. Fails WP:GEOLAND and lacks significant coverage to meet WP:GNG. –dlthewave ☎ 22:51, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Illinois. –dlthewave ☎ 22:51, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Winkel, Illinois

Winkel, Illinois (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Appears to just be a railroad station named after a local family. –dlthewave ☎ 22:15, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Illinois. –dlthewave ☎ 22:15, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: I found this reference, there's is it: https://www.postalhistory.com/postoffices.asp?task=display&searchtext=Winkel&state=IL&county=Tazewell&searchtype=word. VitorFriboquen :] (Talk) 23:06, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

  But looking for this Street View, there's no building, only the roads. VitorFriboquen :] (Talk) 23:07, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

State Road, Illinois

State Road, Illinois (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that this passes WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG. Searches are complicated by the name but did not return any significant coverage. –dlthewave ☎ 21:46, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Illinois. –dlthewave ☎ 21:46, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete Very obviously this was just a flag stop or waypoint on the Illinois Terminal interurban railroad, with no infrastructure at all other than the roads and tracks: . It was called State Road because it was located at Old State Road, now County Road 1350. If you look at the old topo maps, the name State Road disappears after 1943 along with the interurban, only to reappear in 2012 when someone at USGS got all GNIS-happy. So to call this an "unincorporated community" is like saying "Third and Main is an unincorporated community in Indiana" when Third and Main is the site of a city bus stop. The article is a lie. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:58, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Mohamed Atta's Nissan

Mohamed Atta's Nissan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vehicles of the hijackers in the September 11 attacks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

No sources demonstrate notability. I'm suggesting merging to Vehicles of the hijackers in the September 11 attacks, where this article is linked as a {{main}}, however, that article also has no sources demonstrating notability, so deletion of both may be inevitable. If any content is worth keeping, it might be salvaged by merging into other articles, such as American Airlines Flight 11 § Portland, Maine or Mohamed Atta for example.

I found one possible source for each and posted on the talk pages:

• Talk:Mohamed Atta's Nissan § Possible sources
• Talk:Vehicles of the hijackers in the September 11 attacks § Possible sources

By the way, I made some substantial edits to the Nissan article. It used to include a bunch of junk, including leading with the VIN (see permalink as of 4 October).

— W.andrea (talk) 21:45, 6 October 2026 (UTC) last edited 23:47

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of History-related AfD discussions. — W.andrea (talk) 21:45, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete both. This is not encyclopedic material. Trumpetrep (talk) 22:48, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Terrorism, Transportation, Maine, and Massachusetts. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:03, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete both with no prejudice to selective merging elsewhere. None of the sources are about these specific vehicles, or indicate any kind of notability of the vehicles separate from the hijackers themselves. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:13, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete both Having recently read several 9/11 articles including the one about planning, I found these boring and largely irrelevant to the planning and later investigation. Reywas92^Talk 03:13, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: As this is trending to "delete both" already, I have tagged Vehicles of the hijackers in the September 11 attacks for this AfD. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:54, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete both: This would be considered utterly trivial information worth a couple of sentences in an authoritative 600-page book on 9/11. Who in the merry hell (other than the manufacturers, perhaps) gives a damn that Atta drove a blue Nissan Altima instead of a red Honda Civic? This has no more import to a serious issue than the color of the shirt he wore that day. And this article's been around for twenty years already?? Ravenswing 05:15, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

  And this article's been around for twenty years already??

  Someone on Reddit supposed it was written when Wikipedia had lower standards, then it fell through the cracks. — W.andrea (talk) 05:42, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Disjunctive population

Disjunctive population (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Disjunct distribution because the articles cover roughly the same subject matter. Disjunct population already redirects to the disjunct distribution page which is longer and more detailed than the disjunctive population page. The page's unique content should be added to the target page. Caprinae.Caprini.Capra.hircus (talk) 21:14, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Biology, Environment, and Organisms. Caprinae.Caprini.Capra.hircus (talk) 21:14, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Woodford, Illinois

Woodford, Illinois (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that this was anything more than a train station used as a local landmark. –dlthewave ☎ 21:10, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Illinois. –dlthewave ☎ 21:10, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Delete - non-notable railroad stop with not much else notability wise. There are still hundreds of these on Wikipedia. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 21:38, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Welland, Illinois

Welland, Illinois (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Appears to have been a railroad station with a grain elevator. Newspaper search returned only reports of baseball games which do not support the existence of a community. –dlthewave ☎ 21:05, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Illinois. –dlthewave ☎ 21:05, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete From the appearance of the place on topo maps (and even the present satellite view), you'd expect there to be more, because there is infrastructure there to the present day. But I can't find anything, not even in histories of La Salle County. I can find passing mentions such as there once being a store there and maybe a baseball team. Not enough for an article. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:12, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

List of concepts in Artemis Fowl

List of concepts in Artemis Fowl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTPLOT. This list consists solely of a descriptions of story elements from Artemis Fowl. I've never read these books, but this MOS:INUNIVERSE style list does not meet WP:NLIST. Eman7blue42 (talk page | recent edits) 21:02, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Lists. Shellwood (talk) 21:04, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:04, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - Does not meet WP:NLIST, as there are no sources about the group of concepts and terminology used in the books. It's just fancruft. smallest red boy (talk • contribs) 00:28, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Woodyard, Illinois

Woodyard, Illinois (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Appears to have been a railroad station, not a community. –dlthewave ☎ 20:58, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Illinois. –dlthewave ☎ 20:58, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Yeoward Addition, Illinois

Yeoward Addition, Illinois (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subdivision fails GNG and NGEO. –dlthewave ☎ 20:52, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Illinois. –dlthewave ☎ 20:52, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

E.E.E. Sassoon High School

E.E.E. Sassoon High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:12, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Maharashtra. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:28, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Education-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:51, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:52, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: Found two sources and . Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 20:30, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
• Lean redirect — Amongst the sources presented above, the second one is useful. Ping me if another one or two useful sources are located. If not, then redirect to David Sassoon (treasurer)#Philanthropy and legacy as an ATD, where it's mentioned. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 16:13, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of India-related AfD discussions. Jolyfize (talk) 17:25, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio ^giuliano 06:21, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 20:47, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to David Sassoon (treasurer)#Philanthropy and legacy; the school doesn't meet GNG due to a lack of significant coverage (both sources provided are less than one paragraph about the school), but it is mentioned in the article it could be redirected to, so that seems like a good alternative to deletion to me. smallest red boy (talk • contribs) 00:31, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Koolade

Koolade (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This musician does not seem notable. There was a passing mention in a book about his name being said in an advertisement (no other info provided), and perhaps one article on him. Crotian Wikipedia doesn't show much useful information either. He does have an article in Musika.hr and Express and a Q&A, but I'm not sure that this can reach the level of significant coverage that we need. It isn't a whole lot to work with, and doesn't offer much critical commentary on his work. There is allegedly a review of him done by some guy (according to one of the sources) but it isn't used here nor can I find it.

I also suspect that users connected with the subject have been editing the article over the years, based on some promotional language and the edit history. AaronNealLucas (talk) 04:34, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, and Yugoslavia. AaronNealLucas (talk) 04:34, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 20:46, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Ronin Institute

Ronin Institute (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prior to me removing one of the references, three of the references on this article were the organization's official website. Of the two that aren't just the organization's website, one of the articles is co-written by the institute's founder. I have yet to find further news articles that would suggest the institute's notability, only occasional references to the organization when one of its members happens to be discussed. Arctic Circle System (talk) 03:37, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Education, United States of America, and California. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 04:05, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 20:46, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

2029 World Athletics Championships

2029 World Athletics Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose draftifying because, WP:TOOSOON for it yet. Other than the hosts, nothing specific to this edition is known yet.. Vestrian24Bio 14:58, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sports, Sport of athletics, and Kenya. Vestrian24Bio 14:58, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 15:49, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: As rightly said by nominator, nothing much is known about this future event. It should better be created in 2028. -Dympies (talk) 17:15, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Events-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:35, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to World Athletics Championships as a valid WP:ATD Publicwalrus (talk) 00:30, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator suggested draftifying; as such, "per nom" does not seem to entirely support delete !votes. Thoughts on proposed redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:11, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep the event meets notability, contains a decent amount of information and sources compared to other Kenyan stubs. There's no need to delete Renascitur (talk) 14:11, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
• Weak keep: The event has received significant coverage - also as the first World Athletics Championships to be held in Africa. Asteramellus (talk) 23:27, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 20:45, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Dale Swanson

Dale Swanson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is an obituary and does not pass WP:GNG or WP:NBIO. Aneirinn (talk) 19:00, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Motorsport, and Iowa. Shellwood (talk) 19:09, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Weak delete. Effectively unsourced - the two references only support birth and death dates, not any of the other biographical details. The text hints that Swanson might be notable for his work with Johnny Beauchamp, but sources would be needed. (Note that the last paragraph of the current article is about Swanson's grandson, not himself.) Omphalographer (talk) 19:11, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: Per WP:NEXIST. Swanson is extensively covered in the book The Ghosts of Nascar] and in newspapers like the Des Moines Register, Omaha World Herald and Harlan Tribune. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:31, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:04, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 20:44, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Willians Mendez Suarez

Willians Mendez Suarez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete or redirect to Missionary Diocese of Cuba. Fails WP:BIO.

The article is sourced entirely to material produced by the Reformed Episcopal Church or organisations involved in its Cuban mission. Namely REC General Council proceedings, the REC Board of Foreign Missions, Bishop Cummins REC, and Cuba Chronicles. These sources can verify Mendez's ecclesiastical career, but they do not establish notability through independent secondary coverage.

A WP:BEFORE search under Willians Mendez Suarez, Raul Willians Mendez Suarez, Raúl Willians Mendez Suárez, and combinations with bishop, Cuba, and Reformed Episcopal found further denominational material and passing references, but no significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent secondary sources.

Serving as a suffragan bishop does not confer automatic notability under WP:BIO. His episcopal role is already appropriately covered at Missionary Diocese of Cuba and in List of bishops of the Reformed Episcopal Church.

Delete or redirect. Critical Hippo (talk) 20:39, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Apparent second !vote struck as Critical Hippo is the nominator. Jahaza (talk) 22:38, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Religion, Christianity, and Cuba. Critical Hippo (talk) 20:39, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• The author of the comment who has neglected to leave his signature has a conflict of interest here. He has undertaken a campaign of harassment against the reaserch theme of legal aid law firms I started to undertake and has made various unsubstantiated comments and allegations. Critical Hippo (talk) 21:03, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

  The above comment refers to the below comment by Dclemens1971, which was initially unsigned. Jahaza (talk) 22:38, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Speedy keep; this, Charlie Camlin, Walter Banek, and William White (bishop of the Southeast) were clearly nominated for deletion as WP:REVENGE and disruptive editing after I nominated unreviewed pages by this creator for deletion as part of my duties as a new page reviewer (Christina Blacklaws, Thomas Victor Edwards, Anthony Edwards, TV Edwards) and after the nominator declined to answer questions about use of AI. On the merits, WP:CLERGYOUTCOMES makes clear that Anglican bishops are generally found to be notable. But we should not reward bad-faith nominations. Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:10, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

  WP:CLERGYOUTCOMES is about Anglican Communion bishops though and although the Reformed Episcopal Church stands in the Anglican tradition more generally, it is not a member of the Anglican Communion. Jahaza (talk) 22:33, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

  While I generally defer to Dclemens on this kind of thing, Jahaza is right about the REC not being encompassed under our general presumption of notability. The dioceses that this bishop has been assigned to are fairly tiny (some serving a population of registered members smaller than the weekly Sunday attendance at any parish I've been a member of). However, I am seeing glimmers of sources on the subject. If someone digs something independent up, I might vote !vote keep. Otherwise, I'm tentatively leaning delete but don't feel comfortable !voting until the issue of the possible disruption is addressed. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:57, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

  We should probably align the language of CLERGYOUTCOMES with WP:RELIGIONOUTCOMES, which doesn't specify "Anglican Communion". It seems strange (and rather non-NPOV) to say that any flavor of Lutheran or Orthodox bishop is acceptable, but that only one particular flavor of Anglican bishop is. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:38, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

William White (bishop of the Southeast)

William White (bishop of the Southeast) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete or redirect to Diocese of the Southeast (Reformed Episcopal Church). Fails WP:BIO.

The article relies entirely on affiliated sources: White's own diocese, the Reformed Episcopal Church's General Council journal, and a report from another REC diocese. These are adequate for verifying his ecclesiastical career, but they do not establish notability.

A WP:BEFORE search under William J. White, William Joseph White, and combinations with Reformed Episcopal, Diocese of the Southeast, and bishop did not turn up significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent secondary sources; the additional material I found was likewise denominational, directory-style, or passing coverage.

Holding office as a diocesan bishop does not confer automatic notability under WP:BIO. The relevant information is already appropriately covered in Diocese of the Southeast (Reformed Episcopal Church), which includes White in its list of bishops ordinary.

Delete or redirect. Critical Hippo (talk) 20:37, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Religion, Christianity, and United States of America. Critical Hippo (talk) 20:37, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• The author of the comment who has neglected to leave his signature has a conflict of interest here. He has undertaken a campaign of harassment against the reaserch theme of legal aid law firms I started to undertake and has made various unsubstantiated comments and allegations. Critical Hippo (talk) 21:04, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Speedy keep; this, Charlie Camlin, Willians Mendez Suarez, and Walter Banek were clearly nominated for deletion as WP:REVENGE and disruptive editing after I nominated unreviewed pages by this creator for deletion as part of my duties as a new page reviewer (Christina Blacklaws, Thomas Victor Edwards, Anthony Edwards, TV Edwards) and after the nominator declined to answer questions about use of AI. On the merits, WP:CLERGYOUTCOMES makes clear that Anglican bishops (and in particular diocesan bishops like White) are generally found to be notable. But we should not reward bad-faith nominations. Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:09, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of South Carolina-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:07, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Charlie Camlin

Charlie Camlin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete or redirect to List of bishops of the Reformed Episcopal Church. Fails WP:BIO.

The article relies on two sources. The first is Camlin's own diocese and provides essentially the entire biography. The second, Anglican Ink, is explicitly a press release announcing three episcopal elections and contains only brief appointment-level coverage of Camlin. Neither establishes notability.

A WP:BEFORE search under Charlie Camlin, Charles Camlin and Charles F. Camlin found further ACNA, REC and diocesan material, but no significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent secondary sources. Holding office as a suffragan bishop does not confer automatic notability under WP:BIO.

The relevant information is already suitable for inclusion in the REC bishops list. Delete or redirect. Critical Hippo (talk) 20:19, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Religion, Christianity, and United States of America. Critical Hippo (talk) 20:19, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• The author of the comment who has neglected to leave his signature has a conflict of interest here. He has undertaken a campaign of harassment against the reaserch theme of legal aid law firms I started to undertake and has made various unsubstantiated comments and allegations. Critical Hippo (talk) 21:04, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Speedy keep; this, Walter Banek, Willians Mendez Suarez, and William White (bishop of the Southeast) were clearly nominated for deletion as WP:REVENGE and disruptive editing after I nominated unreviewed pages by this creator for deletion as part of my duties as a new page reviewer (Christina Blacklaws, Thomas Victor Edwards, Anthony Edwards, TV Edwards) and after the nominator declined to answer questions about use of AI. On the merits, WP:CLERGYOUTCOMES makes clear that Anglican bishops are generally found to be notable. But we should not reward bad-faith nominations. Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:09, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of South Carolina-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:08, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:09, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Walter Banek

Walter Banek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete or redirect to List of bishops of the Reformed Episcopal Church. Fails WP:BIO.

None of the five cited sources establishes notability. Four are published by organisations with which Banek is directly affiliated: ACNA, his parish, its school, and his diocese. The fifth is a FIFNA item hosted by VirtueOnline and merely mentions Banek in connection with his council membership. These sources can verify biographical details, but WP:BIO expressly provides that primary sources do not contribute towards establishing notability, and passing mentions are insufficient.

A WP:BEFORE search has not turned up the required significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent secondary sources. The additional material I can find is likewise predominantly denominational or directory material. Nor does holding office as a suffragan bishop satisfy any automatic criterion under WP:BIO.

The verifiable information about Banek's episcopal role can adequately be covered in the REC bishops list. Delete or redirect. Critical Hippo (talk) 20:16, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Religion, Christianity, and United States of America. Critical Hippo (talk) 20:16, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Speedy keep; this, Charlie Camlin, Willians Mendez Suarez, and William White (bishop of the Southeast) were clearly nominated for deletion as WP:REVENGE and disruptive editing after I nominated unreviewed pages by this creator for deletion as part of my duties as a new page reviewer (Christina Blacklaws, Thomas Victor Edwards, Anthony Edwards, TV Edwards) and after the nominator declined to answer questions about use of AI. On the merits, WP:CLERGYOUTCOMES makes clear that Anglican bishops are generally found to be notable. But we should not reward bad-faith nominations. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:42, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• The author of the comment who has neglected to leave his signature has a conflict of interest here. He has undertaken a campaign of harassment against the reaserch theme of legal aid law firms I started to undertake and has made various unsubstantiated comments and allegations. Critical Hippo (talk) 21:05, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

  There’s a signature up there 👆 Conflict of interest what??? Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:11, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

  You clearly don't understand the nature of conflicts of interests. You are using allegations you made without evidence to support your article. Critical Hippo (talk) 21:17, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Illinois and Texas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:08, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Dre Deas

Dre Deas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any significant non-primary source coverage about the subject beyond a passing mention or routine roster announcement, therefore Deas fails WP:NSPORT. Raskuly 🐰 19:59, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Football, California, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia (U.S. state), and New York. Raskuly 🐰 19:59, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: More footy spam from Tupelo.... fails WP:SIGCOV so fails WP:GNG. - In solidarity, UtherSRG (talk) 20:21, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

  Hey, no need to say the first half of that. This article dates from 2020–it is not like this is a new article. Raskuly 🐰 20:23, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Fails WP:NSPORT. FiddleheadLady (talk) 00:31, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

List of district officers in Andhra Pradesh

List of district officers in Andhra Pradesh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This list of local government officials in an Indian state fails WP:NLIST, since there are no independent sources that discuss this list as a group. It also fails WP:NOT by being a database and a collection of original research. Page creator removed the notability template so we'll go straight to AfD rather than war over tags. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:57, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Andhra Pradesh. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:57, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete This fails WP:NLIST, since there aren't independent sources that discuss this list as a group. It also fails WP:NOT by being a database and a collection of original research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dafootballguy (talk • contribs) 20:51, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Crazy Mountain

Crazy Mountain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence this non-alcoholic beer brand meets WP:NCORP. The sole independent source in the article is a Parade magazine piece that itself is a fluffy ripoff from a WP:PAGESIX (marginally reliable) article announcing the new brand. The coverage I found in my WP:BEFORE search is beverage industry WP:TRADES publications and the burst of press-release-driven publicity around its launch, which was not WP:SUSTAINED. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:28, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and United States of America. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:28, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep or Merge: The stub might have been too soon, and maybe there's an argument that it is still WP:TOOSOON. I've added an in depth Inc. Magazine staff writer piece to the stub which also covers 15m in fundraising (). This should help with notability as this goes beyond routine financial announcements and provides the independent, analytical business journalism required by WP:NCORP.

If the community feels it still isn't notable enough/too soon and doesn't have enough sustained coverage despite the brand's financial/celebrity backing, i think it at least be highly relevant biographical detail. In that case, I would fully support a Merge of this section into a "Business ventures" section of the George Clooney main article, rather than outright deletion. Nickdyville (talk) 21:40, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Coverage of funding rounds is classic WP:CORPTRIV. I could support a merge as suggested, though. Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:43, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep a couple of other sources including USA Today, Beverage Daily, Food and Beverage Mag, and Westword Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 22:28, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Beverage Daily and Food and Beverage are, as noted in the nom, WP:TRADES publications that do not contribute to corporate notability. The USA Today piece is part of the burst of PR-driven coverage of the launch that wasn't sustained. Dclemens1971 (talk) 22:32, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

I've also tracked down The Lexington Herald-Leader, People (though from about the same time as USA Today), LA Times (but that one's about the funding), VinePair (which is apparently split into two halves, a VP Pro that's a trade mag and VinePair main which is consumer-facing? i'm not the clearest. this one's from the main one), Parade, Fox News (which is an iffy source, though), Business Traveller, and the Jamaica Star, of all places?. I do think that that's enough, even if it's a little clustered - there's some critical analysis and seeming sustained coverage, even on top of the funding and the launch. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 14:55, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

@Jishara: Thanks for taking the time to look at more sources. I'll be honest I'm on the fence here, outside of the USA piece, @Dclemens1971 assessment is right here. Those specific publications do fall heavily into WP:TRADES and the initial PR launch window, which makes keeping this as a standalone page difficult under strict WP:NCORP guidelines.

That being said, while I agree that standard funding announcements fall under WP:CORPTRIV if you look closely at the Inc. magazine piece, the seed funding is just the news hook, the bulk of the article is independent analysis of the company's unconventional distribution strategy (specifically bypassing traditional retail etc etc). So either the USA piece + Inc piece make it notable enough to Keep. Or we could Draftify this piece to see if more information comes out and Merge the headline information of its launch into George Clooney Nickdyville (talk) 16:35, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any additional support for merging to George Clooney?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 18:49, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: I also see the People magazine article in my search for sources, but most are PR items or trade magazines. Very likely TOOSOON, could revisit in 6 months or so. Oaktree b (talk) 19:58, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

YoungArts

YoungArts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only one source that provides WP:SIGCOV, and it was produced "with financial support" from the The Pérez Family Foundation which is an active collaborator with the article subject. In conclusion, does not meet WP:NCORP. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:03, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, United States of America, and Florida. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:03, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep - a notable documentary demonstrates in-depth subject notability, like a notable book on a person would. TheDeafWikipedian (talk) 18:32, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Not if the documentary or book are not independent... ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 09:53, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 18:49, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:11, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Avi Yashchin

Avi Yashchin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:BASIC. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:34, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Finance, Business, and United States of America. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:34, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of New York-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:37, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of People-related AfD discussions. AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 17:49, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete - Sources on article don't seem to be enough for significant coverage, some are unreliable/not independent. Not finding significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources from a Google search either. Timd21 (talk) 18:40, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment – I am Avi Yashchin, the subject of this article, and I disclose that conflict of interest. I have not edited the article and have not paid anyone to edit it or to comment here. For editors' convenience, the independent sources I am aware of with significant coverage of me:
  1. Kira Bindrim, "Ex-Lehman execs set up their own shops", Crain's New York Business, 2 September 2009 (archived; original paywalled here).
  2. Jane Porter, "How to Make the Move From Big-Business Employee to Small-Business Owner", Entrepreneur, 27 February 2012; republished by NBC News.
  3. Christina DesMarais, "Will Clean Tech Be Bigger Than Web 2.0?", Inc., March 2012 (section "Reducing Dependence on Foreign Oil").

  Additional independent coverage that is less in-depth or mainly about my companies, listed for completeness:

  • "Avi Yashchin 2012", New York Real Estate Journal, 23 April 2012.
  • Kelly Pickerel, "CleanEdison, Veterans Green Jobs Join Forces to Put Veterans to Work", Solar Builder, 15 January 2013.
  • "College of Staten Island Partners with CleanEdison", CSI Today, 15 October 2012.
  • Ben Thompson, "Could US jobs report affect presidential race?", BBC News (video, filmed at CleanEdison), 2 November 2012.
  • Vibha Chitkara, "Emerging Tech: AI Vendor Race: Startups to Watch in Synthetic Population and Behavioral Simulation", Gartner, 14 April 2026, ID G00838481 (names Subconscious AI).
  • Zach Cohen and Seema Amble, "Faster, Smarter, Cheaper: AI Is Reinventing Market Research", Andreessen Horowitz, 3 June 2025 (market map includes Subconscious.ai).
  • Elliott Robinson, Andrew Ren and Caty Rea, "The ghost in the machine: Simulation and the future of AI-powered determination", Bessemer Venture Partners (market map includes Subconscious).

  I leave the assessment to editors. If consensus is that this falls short of WP:BASIC, I would ask that the article be draftified rather than deleted. ~2026-52099-05 (talk) 22:26, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: I'm two degrees of connection from ~2026-52099-05, through our mutual, Pete Skurman. Manhattan is microscopic. Bearian (talk) 01:05, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

  My domestic partner also attended and taught at New York University. Bearian (talk) 01:06, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting for a source analysis.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 18:45, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Delete No indication of significance. The refs in the article are particularly bad, but the refs above just as bad. Entrepreneur is a contributor, the BVP seems to be company, the BBC entry is a job report, solarbuild mag is a quote and is not in-depth, a definition of partnership.Chronically bad sources. It is a WP:BLP as well. scope_creep^Talk 19:38, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Double Shot (ride)

Double Shot (ride) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Space Shot (ride) because it seems like the ride itself is notable, but not notable enough to warrant different articles for every variant. Nathanc2127 (talk) 18:43, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Travel and tourism-related AfD discussions. Nathanc2127 (talk) 18:43, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Amusement parks-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:04, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Merge We typically don't have separate articles for installations of a given flat ride or mass-produced roller coaster design. I too fail to see a significant difference between the Turbo Double Shot design and the Space Shot design. Any minor difference (one tower versus two?) could be explained in a section of the target article. — voidxor 20:54, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Turbo Drop

Turbo Drop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Space Shot (ride) because it seems like the ride itself is notable, but not notable enough to warrant different articles for every variant. Nathanc2127 (talk) 18:42, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Travel and tourism-related AfD discussions. Nathanc2127 (talk) 18:42, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Amusement parks-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:04, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Merge We typically don't have separate articles for installations of a given flat ride or mass-produced roller coaster design. I too fail to see a significant difference between the Turbo Drop design and the Space Shot design. Any minor difference could be explained in a section of the target article. — voidxor 20:53, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Belltown Hellcat

Belltown Hellcat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable car, article does not indicate why it is notable. Also WP:NOTNEWS BuffaloTaro (talk) 18:35, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Washington. BuffaloTaro (talk) 18:35, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Draftify: Move to draftspace, it can be expanded. shane (talk to me if you want!) 18:38, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: So, this is a one-line article about a car a guy drove? I've gone as far back in the article history as possible, and that's all this ever was, a one-liner. Care to elaborate? I'm not rewriting the article, nor going through four sources when the article isn't properly written in the first place. If it's that important, Draft and go through AfC. Oaktree b (talk) 18:39, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: The articles are about an online personality, and his car... This article doesn't even mention the person. Not sure why this wasn't A7 deleted. Oaktree b (talk) 18:40, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

  Yes, it does... (shrug) ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:46, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Many sources about the subject, including these and others on the talk page:

‘Belltown Hellcat’ driver to serve 30 days in jail', The Seattle Times

Sleepless in Seattle as a Hellcat Roars Through the Streets, The New York Times

Has Seattle’s ‘Belltown Hellcat’ Lost Its Fearsome Roar?, The New York Times

‘Belltown Hellcat’ driver Miles Hudson charged with reckless driving, The Seattle Times

Seattle's noisy "Belltown Hellcat" driver faces a reckoning', Axios

Seattle orders 'Belltown Hellcat' driver to pay city ..., The Seattle Times

Seattle says 'Belltown Hellcat' driver ignored order to quiet ear-splitting car, KUOW

---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:42, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Not sure what the claim to notability is, the car or the criminal items. This doesn't meet criminal notability and the car is fancy but nothing notable. Oaktree b (talk) 20:01, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Can't say I agree, but if editors prefer no entry, no prob! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 20:13, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Arms (company)

Arms (company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Studio Signpost. Arms was originally founded to manage the "hentai business" sector of Studio Kikan (former name of Studio Signpost), but the two companies lack an independent history and shared the same staff members and the same history. Both companies have historically also been based in the same building. Arms effectively operated as a legally distinct brand label of Kikan/Signpost, and as of 2022, following Arms' bankruptcy in 2020, Signpost continues to use Arms as a label name (Shin Ikki Tousen). In effect, the only distinction between the companies is the legal distinction, otherwise they are seemingly in the same position as Lerche which was merged-into Studio Hibari. Sarca sc (talk) 07:02, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related AfD discussions. Sarca sc (talk) 07:02, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Japan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:50, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. Even if there is a relationship between Studio Kikan/Signpost and Arms, it is not possible to merge them. Arms existed as an independent yūgen gaisha for 24 years, was renamed to Common Sense in 2017 and was dissolved in 2020 by a shareholders' vote, with a notice received by the Tokyo district court. Arms was a wholly separate entity, not a name only. Anime News Network recognizes Arms as a studio on its own (it provides separate entries for Arms, Dandelion and Triple X) and reported its bankruptcy under the headline "Ikki Tousen, Elfen Lied's Studio Arms Declares Bankruptcy". Merging into Studio Signpost is problematic due to the sheer volume of productions — over 100, as evident from tables listing such works as Elfen Lied, Kite, Ikki Tousen, Queen's Blade and Brynhildr in the Darkness. If everything is transferred from Arms to Signpost, that article will basically become one about Arms. If it is not done, the sourced material will simply be lost. The case of Lerche is different, as it was a division of Hibari and not independent. There are sourcing problems involved as well, given that the production tables have hardly any citations, but this involves clean-up work and does not require deletion. El Banhara (talk) 11:28, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

  @El Banhara: Dandelion and Triple X are all brand names used by both Signpost (pre-1996) and Arms (post-1996), ANNs' separate pages aren't wholly relevant, nor actually relevant to the content of the rationale for why I think they should be merged. The legal distinction is something that I'm arguing should be ignored:

  At current, Arms is credited for R18 works from before 1996, meaning R18 works produced prior to its entity founding and thereby belonging to Studio Kikan (Signpost) by technicality. From 1996 onwards, Arms became the primary production label for the companies' works, thus by Kikan (Signpost) are only credited for a handful of projects up until the company was bought by Pierrot in 2008. Do you credit Signpost for these works instead, even after "Arms" takes over the same projects? There is also Signpost's usage of Arms as a brand name after Arms' legal dissolution, which I mentioned (Shin Ikki Tousen). We can see staff members like Kouji Matsumura credited on both Pierrot Plus (Signpost) and Arms works from 2009-2015, a majority of which are actually Arms projects. Despite this, according to Matsumura's Facebook page, he was employed by Pierrot Plus (Signpost). The animation producer for the Signpost work Shima Shima Tora no Shimajirō, Shintarou Nozaki, was also a producer for Arms projects Mezzo Forte, Nakoruru: Ano Hito kara no Okurimono, Hyakki, and so forth. Others, like production manager Hiroshi Kunosato, worked on Arms projects, episodes of series outsourced to Arms, as well as episodes outsourced to Studio Kikan (Signpost) all the same. Yasuomi Umetsu, in his book Unfinished 梅津泰臣アニメーションワークス, makes no distinction between Pierrot Plus (Signpost) and Arms regarding his employment affiliation into 2018 despite the fact that Arms had, effectively, shut down by then.

  You'll also notice that Arms' address is exactly the same as the current Studio Signpost address (itself the same address used by Pierrot Plus).

  Rather than arguing about their distinction, my primary argument is that the two companies were functionally operating as the same company, and the "sheer volume of works" between them are simply both of their works in practice, just not on paper. Sarca sc (talk) 22:50, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Actually, to use a better example: ARMS and Studio Signpost are functionally the same as Anima&Co. and NAZ, which are both listed on the same page on both English and JA Wiki. Sarca sc (talk) 06:12, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

• Leaning keep. I have no knowledge of these relationships, and frankly no recollection of having started this article 17 years ago (presumably to fill a gap for red links), but I am persuaded by El Banhara's articulation of the need for a separate article on this subject. BD2412 T 15:30, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please note that being a separate entity is not, by itself, a valid argument against merging. Articles about related business entities can and are routinely merged, per WP:MERGEREASON and WP:PAGEDECIDE.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 18:31, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Chester Kieffer

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Chester Kieffer
• Articles for deletion/Chester Kieffer (2nd nomination)

Chester Kieffer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Same issues as the previous AfD. This was moved back to mainspace with very little change and the few new sources that have been added still don't establish notability. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:51, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Motorsport, and Luxembourg. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:51, 12 September 2026 (UTC)
• Draftify: Clear-cut WP:TOOSOON, routine race coverage but definitely with potential. Should make it clear to the article creator, though, that it would be best to put it through the AfC process for approval, rather than moving it into mainspace unilaterally again. Sycerion (talk) 09:33, 12 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep – Several local sources already in the article to scrape WP:SIGCOV. Moreover, Kieffer has had a storming rookie season in Porsche Supercup so WP:POTENTIAL is undeniably high. MSport1005 (talk) 10:18, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  @MSport1005: Which local sources specifically? Of the sources added since the last AfD nomination, I'm not really seeing anything that's SIGCOV. Sycerion (talk) 10:35, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  L'Essentiel, Mental, Tageblatt and the extensive coverage from RTL Lëtzebuerg. MSport1005 (talk) 12:59, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  The L'Essential and Mental sources were already in the article when the article was draftified the last time, and thus were already judged to not be SIGCOV. The Tageblatt source is just routine race coverage, as are the newly-added RTL sources (although this one is not bad). Sycerion (talk) 06:49, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

  They are not WP:ROUTINE coverage because they don't cover the championships routinely. They cover Kieffer. That is, by definition, SIGCOV. MSport1005 (talk) 17:20, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

  What do you think routine coverage of a championship entails? voorts (talk/contributions) 17:28, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

  The Tageblatt source is a good example of the issue with most of the sourcing for this guy. There's a reasonable amount of discussion about him, but it's basically just recounting race results with a small amount of additional prose about Kieffer (often from an interview, which we can't include). Thus it's quite difficult to justify any of the sources as SIGCOV. Sycerion (talk) 09:29, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

  POTENTIAL has nothing to do with notability. voorts (talk/contributions) 16:39, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  Yes it does. It is an essay on notability. MSport1005 (talk) 19:49, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  It's an essay about what to do with an actually notable topic, not what to do when a topic is not notable at all. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:09, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  An essay is just someone's opinion; it shouldn't be used to justify a !vote here in the same way a policy/guideline can be. I also struggle to see the relation to notability. Sycerion (talk) 06:52, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep – I think at this stage even if SIGCOV seems to be slightly borderline about Kieffer, I'd say he scrapes WP:NMOTORSPORT by taking overall podiums and clinching the rookie title in Porsche Supercup (the highest level of Carrera Cup competition) and an outright win in its German counterpart (widely regarded as the strongest of the various national Carrera Cup series). Road Atlanta Turn 5 (Talk) 12:54, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

  @Road Atlanta Turn 5: NMOTORSPORT says "Significant coverage is likely to exist for a motorsport figure if ...." If nobody can establish SIGCOV now, he definitionally doesn't meet the criterion. voorts (talk/contributions) 13:15, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

  I feel like results at a primarily-professional series of high importance also have to count towards notability, no? Road Atlanta Turn 5 (Talk) 13:26, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

  No. Notability is based on sourcing. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:14, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  Voorts, you keep ignoring the existence of POTENTIAL, a very common rationale in motorsport AfD's that definitely applies to a 20yo who just got crowned Porsche Supercup rookies' champion. "It's an essay about what to do with an actually notable topic, not what to do when a topic is not notable at all." No matter how hard you want to push this discourse – Kieffer is a serious prospect of Porsche racing, not a nobody. MSport1005 (talk) 13:33, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

  POTENTIAL is similar to WP:DINC. It is not a reason to keep a non-notable article. Re-read the essay carefully. voorts (talk/contributions) 13:38, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

  Your rationale continues to float around the belief that Kieffer is "not notable at all", so this discussion isn't moving forward. I'll wait for further !votes. MSport1005 (talk) 13:58, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

  As I said previously, POTENTIAL is an essay - so not something with any policy weight in deletion decisions. Besides, it addresses what to do with an article on a notable subject that is in poor form, not an article with a potentially non-notable subject that is in good form (as we have here). Sycerion (talk) 10:35, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

  Essays can be relevant in deletion discussions. This one is not. voorts (talk/contributions) 13:07, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep – As previously stated, there are local sources used that scrape WP:SIGCOV. Kieffer won the rookie championship in Porsche Supercup which is not easy in the slightest. On top of that, he has two overall podiums in Supercup which is significant in its own right. I would say that it clearly meets WP:POTENTIAL based on his results in top level series', so draftifying it once more is not needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HomelessPB&J (talk • contribs) 15:58, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  @HomelessPB&J: which sources contain SIGCOV? voorts (talk/contributions) 16:08, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  As stated multiple times above, competition results do not create notability, and POTENTIAL is not a valid justification to keep an article. Sycerion (talk) 03:42, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep – WP:SIGCOV is met due to the number of quality motorsport sources (e.g. Feeder Series, Formula Scout, Porsche Newsroom) and local Luxembourgish sources. Kieffer's success in Porsche Supercup, as well as a recent race win in Porsche Carrera Cup Germany, make him a notable racecar driver. DriverDatabase1 (talk) 08:04, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

  @DriverDatabase1: Can you explain why you think Voorts and my source assessments are incorrect? For example, Porsche Newsroom is very obviously not independent, and the Formula Scout source is a clear-cut passing mention. I struggle to see how any of the sources you have mentioned meet SIGCOV. Sycerion (talk) 10:21, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

  To @DriverDatabase1: while I largely agree with your point, Porsche Newsroom is a WP:PRIMARY source. To @Sycerion: while I see you're very invested in this AfD, you don't need to constantly express the same idea under every keep !vote, this is considered WP:BLUDGEONING. MSport1005 (talk) 14:00, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

  I don't believe I am bludgeoning - I am just trying to understand what the disagreement is from them. But similarly to Voorts I will wait until there are opinions on the source assessment table. Sycerion (talk) 00:34, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep. I think he's WP:NOTABLE enough to have a Wikipedia article. SH360! (Must edit! Must report!) 12:14, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: If the argument is that this individual meets GNG, then sources should be provided to show it.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:53, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Source assessment table prepared by User:voorts

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.its-results.com/ucs/2023/f1f9ba67-39e0-4bc1-b969-70bdaacffd93		Not sure if htis is reliable; it's hosted by a sales company.	Database.	✘ No
https://web.archive.org/web/20240201220306/https://www.f4uae.com/NEWS/10809	Link is usurped and archive.org is down, but this appears to be a press release from the UAE F4 Championship.		Probably not SIGCOV given it's from very early in his career and the press release is titled for a different racer.	✘ No
https://feederseries.net/2024/06/13/luxembourgs-rising-star-in-french-f4-who-is-chester-kieffer/	Interview.	Publication with editors, but no clear fact-checking/ethics policy.		✘ No
https://formulascout.com/taito-kato-and-chester-kieffer-share-french-f4-poles-at-ledenon/118655		Has an editor with staffing from his students.	Routine race coverage.	✘ No
https://www.lessentiel.lu/fr/story/pilote-luxembourgeois-chester-kieffer-veut-conserver-la-trajectoire-ideale-a-spa-103132004	Interview.	Assuming reliability		✘ No
https://formulascout.com/chester-kieffer-and-frank-porte-ruiz-win-at-ledenon-in-french-f4/118689		See source 4.	Routine race coverage.	✘ No
https://www.kartcom.com/en/news/2024/06/28/chester-kieffer-takes-second-f4-win-at-spa-francorchamps/	Per this, they do some independent reporting, but they also have racers as clients, and they don't appear to clearly distinguish between the two.	No clear fact-checking/ethics policy.	Routine race coverage.	✘ No
https://www.kartcom.com/en/news/2024/08/01/a-top-six-finish-after-an-eventful-weekend-at-the-nurburgring/	See source 7.	See source 7.	Routine race coverage.	✘ No
https://feederseries.net/2024/12/14/tight-title-fight-and-many-surprises-french-f4-season-review/		See source 4.	This is significant coverage of the French F4 season, but the discussion of CK is minimal.	✘ No
https://fiaformula4.com/nobels-kieffer-and-rivera-to-make-rokit-british-f4-debuts-at-zandvoort/	FIA press release with a single quote from CK.		Single quote from CK; no independent analysis.	✘ No
https://formulascout.com/ninovic-wins-crazy-british-f4-race-with-saturday-start-and-sunday-finish/121386		See source 4.	Single mention of CK in a results table.	✘ No
https://www.mental.lu/auto-moto/fia-motorsport-games-chester-kieffer-lespoir-du-karting-passe-a-la-f4/	Brief magazine entry; no clear indication if this is a paid placement.	No clear fact-checking/ethics policy. Contact page is 404'd.	Routine race announcement.	✘ No
https://www.acl.lu/sport/fr/magazine/automobile/fia-motorsport-games-summary/		Karting company website.	Brief mentions of CK.	✘ No
https://partnerportal.porsche.com/id/MN25_0063	Porsche press release.		Single sentence about Ck.	✘ No
https://www.porschesport.com/news/strong-rounds-in-barcelona-reveal-the-champions-of-the-porsche-sprint-challenge-southern-europe-2025		Code of conduct for employees.	Routine race coverage.	✘ No
https://www.autosport.nu/nieuws/benelux/flynt-schuring-pakt-op-estoril-twee-zeges-in-de-porsche-sprint-challenge-southern-europe/		No clear fact-checking/ethics policy.	Routine race coverage.	✘ No
https://www.rtl.lu/sport/auto-moto/news/projet-nls-geet-2025-virun-chester-kieffer-wiesselt-vu-formel-4-op-porsche-cup-2254734			Brief analysis of his season and then information bsed on an interview with CK.	✘ No
https://www.flat6mag.com/actualite/porsche-carrera-cup-france-spa-francorchamps/		No clear fact-checking/ethics policy; author's last name is just an initial.	Routine race coverage.	✘ No
https://www.rtl.lu/sport/auto-moto/news/chester-kieffer-bleift-leader-an-der-rookie-waertung-2322731			Routine race coverage.	✘ No
https://www.rtl.lu/sport/auto-moto/news/chester-kieffer-ass-champion-an-der-rookie-kategorie-2343663			Routine race coverage.	✘ No
https://racing.porsche.com/de-DE/articles/carerra-cup-deutschland-2026-test-imola	Porsche press release.		His name appears in two lists.	✘ No
https://today.rtl.lu/sport/local/chester-kieffer-aims-for-porsche-supercup-rookie-crown-2061366476				✔ Yes
https://www.porschesport.com/news/victory-after-race-interruption-schuring-claims-fourth-consecutive-win			Routine race coverage.	✘ No
https://www.tageblatt.lu/Sport/Premierenerfolg-Chester-Kieffer-feiert-Start-Ziel-Sieg-am-Nuerburgring-70625.html			Routine race coverage.	✘ No
https://today.rtl.lu/sport/international/luxembourgs-chester-kieffer-claims-win-at-porsche-carrera-cup-in-germany-243562667			Routine race coverage.	✘ No
https://newsroom.porsche.com/en/ppdb/2026/08/maiden-victory-for-rookie-chester-kieffer-in-action-packed-race.html	Porsche press release.		Routine race coverage.	✘ No
https://www.motorsport-xl.de/news/2026/Porsche-Super-Cup/Sieg-in-Spa-Porsche-Junior-Flynt-Schuring-baut-Fuehrung-im-Supercup-aus-59935.html		No clear fact-checking/ethics policy.	Routine race coverage.	✘ No
https://newsroom.porsche.com/en/ppdb/2026/07/victory-at-spa-porsche-junior-flynt-schuring-extends-supercup-lead.html	Porsche press release.		Routine race coverage.	✘ No
https://www.start84.nl/flynt-schuring-chester-kiefer-and-schumacher-clrt-leaders-of-the-porsche-mobil-1-supercup/		No clear fact-checking/ethics policy.	Routine race coverage.	✘ No
https://www.rtl.lu/sport/auto-moto/news/chester-kieffer-ka-sech-zu-monza-den-titel-an-der-rookie-waertung-secheren-1934712668			Routine race coverage.	✘ No
https://newsroom.porsche.com/en/ppdb/2026/09/chester-kieffer-is-the-porsche-mobil-1-supercup-rookie-champion.html	Porsche press release.		Routine race coverage.	✘ No
https://www.kartcom.com/en/pilot/kieffer-chester/	See source 7.	See source 7.	Database entry.	✘ No
https://www.driverdb.com/championships/porsche-sprint-challenge-southern-europe-sport-division-pro/2025/standings		I haven't looked into who operates this site.	Database.	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

• Comment – Because Voorts is treating it as such in their table, let this be a reminder that WP:ROUTINE "is not a disqualification for notability" and "may indeed be significant enough to surpass WP:GNG". Additionally, "if an article goes into detail about the event, it is not necessarily "routine" coverage. Not every sporting event earns a feature article in the press, and not every professional hopeful gains significant coverage and feature articles." In fact, all the pieces from Tageblatt and RTL Lëtzebuerg cover the event because Kieffer races in it. This adds to the long feature on RTL and the interviews on Feeder Series and L'Essentiel, which you agreed are all WP:SIGCOV, plus the potential for more to arise — so I am sticking to my earlier call. MSport1005 (talk) 19:52, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

  Regarding your quotation of WP:NOTROUTINE (not WP:ROUTINE), the articles referenced in the table above are not "significant enough" to meet GNG.

  What evidence do you have that Tageblatt and RTL are only covering F1-associated events because of CK's involvement? Both publications appear to routinely cover motorsports, as is evident by the fact that none of the stories are specifically about CK.

  Finally, ou are cherry picking my analysis of the Feeder Series and L'Essential articles. The first Feeder Series article and the L'Essential article are both interviews, and are therefore not independent of the subject and do not contribute to GNG. Here's wht I said about the second Feeder Series article: This is significant coverage of the French F4 season, but the discussion of CK is minimal. I did not agree that the article provides SIGCOV of CK. I also noted that I am generally unsure of Feeder Series' reliability. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:27, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

  The WP:ONUS is on you to show when else Tageblatt and RTL have "routinely" covered Porsche Supercup and PCCD without Kieffer on the grid.

  Moreover, I am not cherry picking because you ticked the SIGCOV box on both the Feeder Series and L'Essential interviews. I acknowledge that you have doubts on Feeder Series' reliability – however I, as a regular WP:MOTORSPORT editor, do not. Their reputation has grown exponentially with time and they've got reporters on most paddocks out there. MSport1005 (talk) 22:56, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

  Cherry picking is taking a single aspect of a thing and trying to use it to your advantage. For example, the fact that the interviews contain sigcov is irrelevant because interviews are not independent and don't contribute to GNG. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:00, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

  I'm not using anything to my advantage — this is not a fight. It's an AfD where each user judges and votes freely. Your attitude here raises concerns about your interests with this AfD. MSport1005 (talk) 23:18, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

  The ultimate point is that I think only one source contributes to GNG. I'll let others weigh in on the source analysis. I am not persuaded by your position for now. Additional arguments may persuade me otherwise. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:21, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

  Same here, I'll take a backseat too. MSport1005 (talk) 23:30, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• Weak keep It’s probably not as clear cut as some argue above, but he does seem to cross the notability threshold. Go4thProsper (talk) 22:59, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep There's not really an aggregator to Porsche Newsroom for the Porsche Super Cup Coverage because they are a support series of Formula 1 which is under FOM management which highly regulates and restricts their media paddock due to the vast amount of attention. They are the pinnacle of the Global Marquee Seasonal Sportscar Championships anyway (so across all manufacturers) so a straight decline of the primary source is not feasible when it is basically closed source on venue and unapproachable from an independent reporter source trying to enter coverage (Sportscar365 is a valid source but they have Porsche Carrera Cup reports for National and Continental but they have no Supercup section because they aren't in the F1 Paddock and have to aggregate from other sources and rewording from Porsche Newsroom is both a bit pointless and may not even be financially sustainable as a copyright fee outweigh their exposition they can get back from newspaper sales and ad revenue). Interviews have been generally dismissed because they weren't considered independent regardless of content, to me that is overlooking of journalistic deterministic work - Some Interviewers give away their questions in a pre-arangement so the answer can be a pre-fabricated phrase that is just taped later but that is generally not the case especially not on lower division formulae which journalists keep on a tight timeframe regardless so it is an in the moment response and no pre-made fabrication both parties agreed on, so just because one side is on the article topics response does not automatically disqualifies them, even when it's not directly quoting from it, there still may be information sourced from it's information frame.
  I view results as a criteria for notability in sports, so he has the accolades to be included. Is it the sole reason ? Not necessarily - But it is a ladder system and at some point the notability of results should be recognized as a weighing factor, some domestic partial state or minor federal title in a youth tournament is not enough to be notable beyond the little regional bubble, it can be added in as a entry point when there have been later more significant and broadly accepted results and coverage that is a professional national title (as an adult), continental or worldwide entries in the high to mid range ladder and adjacency if it's not a title win then a Podium on an end classification table, that is either very selected to be an entry on at all due to previous shown promise and fulfilling results in lower or bordering professional ladder system steps or very close top positions in at least semi-professionalism capacity over minimum a season or and event that requires prolonged pre-exercising like the Olympics in a professional environment.
  Very much all the race coverage have been viewed as routine and dismissed, when it is essentially in the same style as with more prominent and eligible figures - at a certain point you cannot emphasize that it is too broad when it is in the same style as for other people that were and still are allowed and have been recognized as a prominent figure with significant coverage. When this one is rejected regardless of shown results, and coverage deemed as insignificant then it is very unclear what sourcing is required going forward because what even is considerable when it almost has to withstand scrutiny that requires scientific methods.
  A sole result table isn't enough to stand on it's own and Wikipedia isn't a Database, a sole article might not meet top journalistic criterie but having all this information aggregated clearly shows it is significant coverage to create the article, which isn't a stub lacking information, only just closely related to the topic (primary sourcing is not an exclusion criteria if it's supplemented with secondary and tertiary sources). This article isn't just a database, it's not just a biography and not just an essay. If one uses the dissected source table and apply it to the Jamaica national bobsleigh team it can be skewed in the same direction if it would not have been a global phenomenon, they don't have the results to warrant notability but they have had a movie made about them that have an estimated 200 Million viewers and the general story is probably known to around 500 million people worldwide for their unique and obstacle way to entry, yet if you try and dissect the wiki article with the attitude that it is just a database that provides the stats, many of the article sources are dead and you belittle the coverage there is as routine and not worth mentioning that misses the mark. For someone from a small state with no more than 10 people in the same profession at a time this amount of variable coverage is quite significant and with Luxembourg you have the luxury that it has 4 languages and bordering larger nation press all able to gain this much coverage of it isn't the norm either. Also you have to consider Churnalism is also a factor for more popular and broadly recognized people. There is more journalistic effort by media overall to get health information on Michael Schumacher despite no new information is to be revealed (yet they keep trying and churn out status articles of nothing) than very much 80 % of the lower ladder drivers get throughout their whole career, this is not the case here - it is just that the exposure for lower division is much less and what you try to get is impossible if you want a dedicated focus only on this person but at the same time sweep aside interviews (which have more information than just the exchange of questions), written result articles that confirm the stat tables (which you also invalidate as a source, when it's a legit source when used in conjunction with text based story related to the article topic) and overall performance. I personally cannot make out with made the first today.rtl.lu more significant compared to the two following ones, except that it had two sentences written from his perspective. For the outside viewer you watch a field and dispersion and over time the better performing participants and the contesting overtakes but you don't generally just tune in one's perspective without resulting in favoritism and fandom if you just have this one perspective - It is either a rotation of various other perspectives across at-least more than half the participants per field or temporary focus on an individual for a short time. Not sure why you would need an article to be structured to be majorly from that individuals perspective when the participation is confirmed, and the outcome determined - It is conclusive.
  It's like focusing on the horse race jockey that eventually wins and view it from their perspective, disregarding that it's result and coverage is random and viewed from the side for the most part. We don't know that perspective will be extensively covered, for the most part it is not and that the ethics is questioned on the reliable is a good point but not really applicable here. In Fairness news report coverage address podium finishers, seasonal achievers and top 5 or top 10 with due respect but it's not significant from one's individual perspective every time. It's significant from the whole series perspective or the outside viewer that has a general interest - but not favourism - not sure how much more in-depth it should be when the approach is generally the same in that field of journalism. M1GHTY M4VS (talk) 17:47, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

  I don't really understand all of your arguments; they are lengthy and you have a lot of run-on sentences that turn into digressions. Below are my responses to what I think you're trying to argue.

• There's not really an aggregator ... from newspaper sales and ad revenue). If what you're trying to say here is that Porsche restricts reporters from attending the event and therefore we should excuse a lack of coverage, I don't buy that argument. A reporter doesn't need to be at an even to write a story about a racer.
• Interviews have been generally dismissed ... information sourced from it's information frame. Interviews do not establish notability because they are not independent of the article subject. These interviews do not contain significant coverage written by the journalist.
• I view results as a criteria for notability in sports ... event that requires prolonged pre-exercising like the Olympics in a professional environment. The community does not. See WP:NSPORTS2022.
• Very much all the race coverage have been viewed as routine and dismissed ... it is very unclear what sourcing is required going forward because what even is considerable when it almost has to withstand scrutiny that requires scientific methods. Significant coverage is required (coverage that describes CK as a person in detail) not brief mentions or race result coverage. The style of writing is completely irrelevant to whether a source establishes notability.
• A sole result table isn't enough to stand on it's own and Wikipedia isn't a Database ... It is conclusive. The reason for deletion is that this person fails WP:GNG, not that the article is a database or a stub. The Jamaica national bobsleigh team article is completely irrelevant to this one and I don't understand why you're bringing it up. That team is notable because there's signicicant coverage about it. I don't really understand the remainder of this paragraph.
• I don't understand the point you're trying to make in your last paragraph.

voorts (talk/contributions) 17:23, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Respectfully, could you please avoid walls of text? Also, writing 150-word-long sentences (yes, really) is not doing any favours for the closers. I also struggle to see how the vast majority of this is relevant to this discussion - pontificating about the status of motorsport journalism is not going to help. Sycerion (talk) 07:36, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment - This is a bit of a naughty thing to say, and I do not mean to attack the opinions of the above, but I do think it would be good to get further opinions from editors who are not involved in editing motorsports, if possible? Thus far we've had seven keep !votes (all making much the same point), with all but one editor being primarily interested in motorsports. Sycerion (talk) 07:29, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

  Yes, well, that's deletion sorting for you. In general, editors from the WikiProjects an article spans will be most clued, interested, and (sometimes) better suited to find and evaluate sources. MSport1005 (talk) 17:40, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. At first glance I don't see this source mentioned yet in the above discussion; a nearly 4-minute TV portrait on the national tv in Luxemburg (RTL). In addition to all the other coverage, this seems to go beyond routine coverage and clearly become substantial coverage about the subject in general, not just a report of one race or similar. Fram (talk) 13:05, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: If I had to assess consensus now, I'd close it as N/C since several of the earlier "keep" !votes, as well as the "keep" wall of text, would be discounted for not being rooted in policies and guidelines. But this has only been relisted once, and it would be good to get some additional thoughts here, especially from editors who work outside the motorsport area.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:16, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep good point from Fram, the profile on TV is solid. In terms of other sources, they're weaker than I'd like but sufficient to show notability. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 22:34, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep new sources showed, WP:HEY, the coverage is not more trivial or routine. At least, should be kept per WP BASIC. Never-ending string (talk) 07:53, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Arguments on the whole are remarkably poor: when a source has been offered and challenged, assessments of it need to go beyond mere assertions. Giving this a final week to allow analysis of Fram's source and the others above.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:14, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Even if Fram's source is SIGCOV, that means we have one article from RTL and one video from RTL, which means we only have SIGCOV from a single source, which is still not enough to establish notability. I think I've sufficiently explained why the other sources don't establish notability in my source analysis and in responding to other editors when they've purported to identify other sources with SIGCOV. voorts (talk/contributions) 18:25, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: Racing in the minor leagues of the sport, this was the only RS I could find . I don't see a pass at notability; this is largely a tabulated chart of every race, not really notable for our purposes. Oaktree b (talk) 18:43, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Zearing, Illinois

Zearing, Illinois (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient coverage to meet GNG or NGEO. –dlthewave ☎ 18:05, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Illinois. –dlthewave ☎ 18:05, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Zenith, Illinois

Zenith, Illinois (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searching is made difficult by Chicago-based Zenith Electronics, but there are no results in Wayne County newpapers or other coverage to meet GNG of NGEO. –dlthewave ☎ 18:02, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Illinois. –dlthewave ☎ 18:02, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Mahni Ghorashi

Mahni Ghorashi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Filed by the Volunteer Response Team on behalf of the article's subject, who said this: "I'm the subject of a Wikipedia article, "Mahni Ghorashi," and I'm writing to request a deletion of the article. I regard myself as a non-notable, private person, and I was hoping someone might assist me with deleting my page. Many thanks for any help."

Please see WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. Thanks, — 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 17:46, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Tennessee. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:48, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: I'm not sure this person is notable, doesn't seem to meet NPOL. The few sources that are RS, 2, 13, 14 and 16 are about hot dogs; this person is asked their opinion/commenting on things. Otherwise, sources are orange or red per Cite Highlighter, non-RS. Easy !delete, non-notable individual and relies in non-RS. Oaktree b (talk) 20:05, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Merge to Clear Labs - His only claim to notability is co-founding Clear Labs, which already has its own article. As per WP:NOTINHERITED, notability of the company would not transfer to its founders, and the subject does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO independently.Macdddd (talk) 20:17, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Merge to Clear Labs: Reasonable to want to search for a company's founder, and company should likely have some info about the founders. - In solidarity, UtherSRG (talk) 21:52, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete – I had some serious concerns in 2020 about the veracity of the citations used in this article (Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1052 § Mahni Gorashi) and there were related discussions at Talk:Mahni Ghorashi. There is no significant independent coverage to warrant an article. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:53, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Killswitch (video game)

Killswitch (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While it has mentions in reliable sources, they are clearly trivial, and the article has many unreliable sources. It appears to fail WP:GNG. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 17:44, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Video games. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 17:44, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Delete Nearly all mentions recount the legend and stop there. There isn't much else to say about it than it was actually a short story by Valente. The only source that is able to go further than this is the Švelch book, which does dedicate an interesting page discussing what made the legend "superficially credible" and that its design appealed due to using Soviet bloc stereotypes. More of that would turn the dial. Cross-referencing with Polybius, you find discussion of themes, influences, and legacy that demonstrate notability through cultural commentary and impact. That isn't demonstrated here. Obviously no article has to be perfect on creation, but leaving a short description then WP:REFBOMBing every source one can find does not help. VRXCES (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Delete Per nom. An editor from Mars (talk) 00:29, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

• Keep, added four more sources (including Kotaku, Gizmodo, Wired, and Screenrant) and the "Cultural analysis and reception" section. --ToonAdventurer (talk) 05:35, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

  Wired still seems like trivial coverage so while this does get close, it's not really enough for me to withdraw the AfD outright. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:57, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

• Keep WP:HEY applies, and this has two web articles fully dedicated to it, plus academic analysis, plus shorter treatment in other articles. And now is also beyond the arbitrary 250 word WP:STUB threshold. Fulfills WP:GNG. Daranios (talk) 06:31, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

  I will withdraw specifically the argument that the page should be deleted, though I believe a merge to Catherynne M. Valente would be possible. She essentially invented the entire concept and story of the game on her blog, Invisible Games, and later in The Melancholy of Mechagirl. I've found a review for the Mechagirl book, but will have to check further if it's notable. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:17, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Christina Blacklaws

Christina Blacklaws (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable English solicitor. Coverage is limited to: a WP:PRIMARYSOURCE Q&A interview, routine coverage in WP:TRADES (not mainstream publications) that one would expect for someone who was the elected chair of her trade association (, , , , , , , ), WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs of her in coverage of other topics (, , ), affiliated sources (, , , , , ), and primary sources (,, . There's basically no WP:SIGCOV in independent, secondary, reliable sources. My WP:BEFORE search turned up a Guardian article but it is entirely based on her own comments (almost a Q&A) and thus not truly independent coverage. I see no evidence of notability under any WP:NBIO guideline (president of the Law Society of England and Wales is not an office that confers notability). Article appears to be part of a broader WP:ADMASQ effort connected to Blacklaws' firm TV Edwards. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:38, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Law, and England. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:38, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Comment Blacklaws was elected a fellow of Exeter College, Oxford in 2023, which will contribute to notability. As she left TV Edwards in 2011, I am not clear on why this would be part of a campaign to bolster that law firm. I will see what more content I can fine, beyond the extensive list above which could cumaltively be an argument for WP:BASIC. DaffodilOcean (talk) 20:51, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

  Being elected an honorary fellow of a constituent college is different from being elected a fellow of a major academic society. At Exeter, it seems like the equivalent of an honorary doctorate, which is not generally thought to confer notability (and at any rate being granted such distinction by her own alma mater is even less notable). Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:54, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

  This seems to be very much the basis of your opinion. Please refer to appropriate sources. Critical Hippo (talk) 21:08, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

  The description of Honorary Fellows for Exeter College says the following: "Exeter College is pleased to announce the election of ten new Honorary Fellows, each highly distinguished in their field and elected by Exeter’s Governing Body." The phrase I think is most relevant is 'highly distinguished in their field'. DaffodilOcean (talk) 21:09, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Keep You conflate WP:NCORP with WP:BIO. The presumption against trade publications appears in NCORP and applies to determining the notability of organisations and companies. There is no equivalent exclusion in the biographical guideline.

Under WP:BIO, the question is whether Blacklaws has received significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent secondary sources. She has been the subject of a substantial profile in The Guardian, plainly a national general-interest source, alongside independently written coverage and interviews in established legal publications.

Specialist legal press is not automatically disqualified from establishing the notability of a lawyer. What matters is whether the particular source is reliable, independent and provides non-trivial coverage. Routine appointment notices and supplied biographies should be discounted, substantive editorial profiles should not. Critical Hippo (talk) 20:52, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

WP:TRADES publications are not generally independent of the businesses they cover and are thus not independent of the people who work for those businesses. And as I've pointed out, the Guardian profile is almost entirely composed of her own quotes and is clearly not independent of her. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:55, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Source? Critical Hippo (talk) 21:06, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I now see a clear consensus to delete. Owen× ☎ 07:12, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

CarExpert

CarExpert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of WP:NCORP, just WP:CORPTRIV and some non-notable awards. Athanelar (talk) 00:19, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Business, Companies, and Australia. Athanelar (talk) 00:19, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete self promotional.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Teraplane (talk • contribs)
• Delete. This article does meet any of our guidelines for notability. Aneirinn (talk) 20:10, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep, but with work. There's enough for notability, but the page is currently highlighting it. I'll try to finish the edits from the ER (bit of a mess but I'm making my way through) to see if that helps. --FeldBum (talk) 12:53, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

  WP:JUSTNOTABLE isn't a sound keep rationale; which sources do you think demonstrate notability here? Athanelar (talk) 21:09, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

  Honestly, lots of citations, IMO, like:

  • Funding/IPO:
    • https://www.afr.com/street-talk/carexpert-recuts-equity-raising-rich-lister-tips-in-20220913-p5bhq0
    • https://premium.goauto.com.au/on-the-road-to-an-ipo/
    • https://www.afr.com/street-talk/carexpert-raising-10m-to-buy-price-my-car-ipo-in-2024-20220422-p5afhj
    • https://mumbrella.com.au/i-sold-my-website-for-more-than-60m-and-now-its-being-turned-off-649339
    • https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/online-newcar-classified-site-carexperts-valuation-hits-50m-on-capital-raising/news-story/0d17c403015b9f0a251b9e89b6a60158
    • https://premium.goauto.com.au/nz-media-invests-in-carexpert/
    • https://www.businessnewsaustralia.com/articles/carexpert-shifts-gear-with-strategic-investment-from-trade-me.html
  • Partnerships/Expansion
    • https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/carexpert-gears-up-as-seven-west-media-takes-strategic-stake/news-story/38380b2d0e9a3a8959b02809ceddaf05
    • https://thewest.com.au/business/automotive/laurence-escalante-backed-carexpert-revs-up-for-wa-expansion-c-8545256
    • https://mumbrella.com.au/sevens-stake-in-carexpert-more-than-just-a-traffic-play-says-alborz-fallah-710481
    • https://autotalk.com.au/industry-news/acm-drops-drive-in-favour-of-carexpert
    • https://premium.goauto.com.au/why-nine-is-ditching-caradvice/
  • History
    • https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/caradvice-to-be-sold-to-nine-for-a-reported-30-million-20160902-gr7ulx
    • https://www.smartcompany.com.au/startupsmart/carexpert-funding-alborz-fallah-caradvice-co-founder/
    • https://cyprus-mail.com/2021/10/26/carexpert-com-au-snaps-up-website-of-the-year-award/
    • https://premium.goauto.com.au/rielly-leaves-carexpert/
  • Features
    • https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/technology/cameras-ai-drive-car-sales/news-story/7e6008fee22779d601b8a5b7a7021ce2
    • https://autotalk.com.au/industry-news/carexpert-launches-australias-first-large-scale-car-buying-service
    • https://premium.goauto.com.au/carexpert-reinvents-itself/
    • https://premium.goauto.com.au/carexpert-launches-new-business-model/

  To me, looks like enough to meet WP:ORG, but I haven't checked those sources in WP:RSP (I don't know the Australian market well, just answered an ER)

  --FeldBum (talk) 20:44, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

  Did you actually check these sources against WP:NCORP before endorsing them? Just as an example, this one is both WP:CORPTRIV (routine coverage of regular business activities) and also not independent (it's based entirely on a press release(s) from the company, full of has announced... CarExpert says... CarExpert CEO Damon Rielly said in a statement...) Please filter these kinds of obviously unsuitable sources before you ask someone else to spend their time reviewing them Athanelar (talk) 10:51, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: WP:REFBOMBing with WP:CORPTRIV sources is not a good way to make a case for retention.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 17:27, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: The long list of sources provided are textbook examples of WP:CORPTRIV. WP:NCORP is not met. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:39, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Not meeting WP:NCORP and additional sources above do not meet WP:SIGCOV. FiddleheadLady (talk) 00:36, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Thomas Victor Edwards

Thomas Victor Edwards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable solicitor. Coverage is limited to: WP:TRADES coverage of his firm, not of him personally (, ), press releases from his firm (, ), WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs (, ), a primary source (, and sources that don't mention him (, , , ). No evidence of notability from a WP:BEFORE search (I couldn't even find an independently published obituary). Appears to be part of a broader WP:ADMASQ effort connected to the law firm he started. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:25, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Law, and England. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:25, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Keep The basis of your argument relies too heavily on unsubstantiated allegations. Critical Hippo (talk) 21:10, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

The basis of the argument is WP:N. Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:30, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Anthony Edwards (solicitor)

Anthony Edwards (solicitor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable solicitor. Coverage is limited to a primary source Q&A, a primary source bio, his own works (, , ) a brief [mention in a WP:TRADES publication, a tribute in a trade publication he wrote for and thus not independent, a press release from his own law firm, WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs (, , , ) and a source that doesn't mention him. The only source that comes near qualifying for WP:GNG is a local news mention of a book he wrote, and that's not nearly enough. The page creator appears to have put every mention of Edwards ever into this; I didn't find anything in my BEFORE search to indicate a pass of WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO or WP:NAUTHOR, or any other applicable guideline. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:14, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Law, and England. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:14, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Keep A lot of your argument is reductionist. You have failed to engage with the vast majority of sources.

"The page creator appears to have put every mention of Edwards ever into this"

The above comment has no relevance to anything at all. Critical Hippo (talk) 21:12, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

An analysis of every single source is “failure to engage”? And the point that you have put every single mention is that in my BEFORE search I couldn’t find any additional sources. Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:31, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Peter Keane (musician)

Peter Keane (musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete - From WP:BEFORE I cannot see that there exists SIGCOV on this subject. It appears that he released a couple of albums in the 1990s and that he was locally notable in Austin but did not have the wider reach that would make him sufficiently notable to warrant an article. Does not meet any criteria of WP:MUSICBIO BleachPuffin (talk) 17:13, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Ohio, and Texas. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:18, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Keep per WP:MUSICBIO#1. See coverage from 3 sources: , , , , . ResonantDis_tortion 07:00, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Istituto Marangoni Miami

Istituto Marangoni Miami (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

AI slop. TNT. msk 17:05, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Suspected AI-generated articles. msk 17:05, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Florida. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:17, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

I've tried my luck at a G11 since it is also wholly promotional. msk 17:21, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Comment Seems like a speedy delete as it's all AI. Easy !delete. Oaktree b (talk) 20:08, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, it is AI-generated and fails NOLLM. ‑‑gurkubondinn 22:42, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NOLLM. FiddleheadLady (talk) 00:43, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

I'm Not / Comfy in Nautica

I'm Not / Comfy in Nautica (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Merging to Person Pitch because there is one (1) notable detail about this song and it is the inclusion of it in a list of best songs by The Rolling Stone, this would be best suited to the albums reception section rather than having a separate article on an otherwise unnotable single. -Samoht27, forever with the workingfellow. (talk! and see!) ( 17:04, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Albums and songs, and Music. -Samoht27, forever with the workingfellow. (talk! and see!) ( 17:04, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Carrots (song)

Carrots (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This limited release double-single-thingle has almost no coverage at all and no coverage in reliable sources. Possible merge to Person Pitch but I would prefer a redirect. -Samoht27, forever with the workingfellow. (talk! and see!) ( 17:00, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Albums and songs, and Music. -Samoht27, forever with the workingfellow. (talk! and see!) ( 17:00, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Fachhochschule

Fachhochschule (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to [] and [] respectively.

The term "Fachhochschule" has become seldom used since ca. the year 2000 in favour of the literal German translation of "university of applied sciences" (Hochschule der angewandten Wissenschaften). Very few institutions still actually use the term; see the German wiki for more information [].

Information about the specific German situation of UAS should therefore be merged into the corresponding section, which already exists in the article []. The (specifically German) differentiation between "Hochschule" and "Universität" (both translate to "university" in English) is certainly important but is already described in [] and [], which should respectively be updated and expanded on. Lk1984 (talk) 16:53, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Speedy close. Lk1984, you started a deletion discussion, not a merge discussion. Please withdraw this and go start a merge discussion on the article talk page. Drmies (talk) 16:56, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

  Seconding that merger discussions are actually done through AFD now. Geschichte (talk) 05:21, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: an RfC earlier this year moved merge discussions from talk pages to AfD. This is in fact tagged as a merging discussion and not a deletion discussion as a result (there is malformed syntax with regard to links, but that's the entirely of how malformed it is). No opinion on the proposal itself. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:16, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:17, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Game On Expo

Game On Expo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable event with only routine coverage -Samoht27, forever with the workingfellow. (talk! and see!) ( 16:50, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Anime and manga, Events, United States of America, and Arizona. -Samoht27, forever with the workingfellow. (talk! and see!) ( 16:50, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Walking Cricket

Walking Cricket (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

LLM-generated article about an unnotable topic. Declined at AfC but the creator moved it to mainspace anyway.. Vestrian24Bio 16:32, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Cricket. Vestrian24Bio 16:32, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Suspected AI-generated articles-related AfD discussions. ‑‑gurkubondinn 16:33, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Super Speeds

Super Speeds (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company as well as being entirely unsourced. Having searched around per WP:BEFORE, I found nothing. BuffaloTaro (talk) 15:31, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Motorsport, Transportation, and India. BuffaloTaro (talk) 15:31, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:19, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - Unable to find any sources on this, does not meet WP:GNG with no WP:SIGCOV. FiddleheadLady (talk) 00:47, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Kliny (selo), Kolchuginsky District, Vladimir Oblast

Kliny (selo), Kolchuginsky District, Vladimir Oblast (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability for this selo. Possible duplicate or alternate counting unit for Kliny (settlement), Kolchuginsky District, Vladimir Oblast. –dlthewave ☎ 15:11, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Russia. –dlthewave ☎ 15:11, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

No, these are two different localities, which you could have easily checked using the interwiki links. Ymblanter (talk) 17:17, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Keep Both locations are visible on Google Maps as separate settlements. Both are notable under GEOLAND. The Russian Wikipedia page for this location claims that it had more than 500 inhabitants in the 19th century. Kelob2678 (talk) 21:32, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Dubki (selo), Kolchuginsky District, Vladimir Oblast

Dubki (selo), Kolchuginsky District, Vladimir Oblast (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a duplicate or alternate census unit of Dubki (settlement), Kolchuginsky District, Vladimir Oblast. These two articles have identical locations however the settlement has the higher population count. –dlthewave ☎ 15:05, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Russia. –dlthewave ☎ 15:05, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

These are two different localities, which is apparent if one checks the interwiki links. Ymblanter (talk) 20:19, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Merge per WP:NOPAGE. The locations are notable under GEOLAND, but looking at Google Maps, they appear to be close enough together to be, de facto, a single settlement. Kelob2678 (talk) 21:38, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Petar Popović (tennis)

Petar Popović (tennis) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability, including SIGCOV. WP:BEFORE is difficult because this name is so common, even when searching in Serbian. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 14:53, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Tennis, and Serbia. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 14:53, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Rashid Al Zlami

Rashid Al Zlami (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My search has not uncovered any sources which fulfill WP:CREATIVE; he's been quoted some but, i think, that isn't sufficient without further sources or evidence of substantial works or influence. ~ Lindsay^Hello 14:02, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Poetry, and Saudi Arabia. ~ Lindsay^Hello 14:02, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Kandasamy Nallasivam

Kandasamy Nallasivam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the requirements of WP:ANYBIO, is almost solely reliant upon Wordpress websites and primary sources. Dan arndt (talk) 13:32, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People and Sri Lanka. Dan arndt (talk) 13:32, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Dutch Coal Trade Union

Dutch Coal Trade Union (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent sources found. Because of the contents, it seems the Steenkolen Handels-Vereniging is meant, which already is described in SHV Holdings. Tekstman (talk) 13:23, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Business, and Netherlands. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 14:48, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Chaleun Sekong Group

Chaleun Sekong Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed drafification; WP:DRAFTOBJECT applies. Wikipedia is Not a trade directory. The word "conglomerate" nor the styling of this business as a conglomerate grants no notability in and of itself. The references do not show it to pass WP:NCORP. Alleged involvement in money laundering is WP:ROTM 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 13:13, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies, and Laos. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 13:13, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Draftify again, and ECP protect so that acceptance will be by a reviewer. None of the references provide significant coverage. The nominator says that the designation of "conglomerate" does not confer corporate notability, and that is correct. The fact that the economy of Laos consists mostly of conglomerates is attested by the references, which do not confer corporate notability either.

Number	Reference	Remarks	Independent	Significant	Reliable	Secondary	Meets GNG
1	https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/international/asean/laos-politically-linked-conglomerates-dominate-its-small-economy	Says that Laotian congolomerates exist.	Yes	Not about this conglomerate.	Yes	Yes	No
2	https://en.evn.com.vnPassing mention of a contract signing		Yes	No. Passing mention.	Yes	Yes	No
3	https://www.devex.com/organizations	Corporate information. Says that it exists	?	No. Says that it exists.	Yes	?	No
4	https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/app5.318	About the Laotian debt crisis	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No
5	https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/international/asean/laos-politically-linked-conglomerates-dominate-its-small-economy	Same as 1	Yes	Not about this conglomerate.	Yes	Yes	No
6	https://laotiantimes.com/2026/08/03/l	Article about money laundering. Non-significant mention of company	Yes	Not significant	Yes	Yes	No
7	https://www.unodc.org/roseap/uploads/documents/Publications/2024/TOC_Convergence_Report_2024.pdf	A report about transnational organized crime	Yes	Not about the company	Yes	Yes	No

The group may be notable in the future, which is what draft space is for. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:20, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

• Draftify as nom - TurquoiseGoose•they/them•(talk) 04:46, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Bolaji Akinola

Bolaji Akinola (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing notability here. Most coverage is him being quoted as STOAN spokesman or columns he wrote himself. The PhD and the 2025 adviser appointment look like one press release run in several papers, Vanguard, ThisDay and Blueprint have near identical text. Books are self published, no reviews. Ex MARAN president and media adviser to a minister doesn't seem enough on its own. ArcticSnowWind (talk) 12:38, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, and Nigeria. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 14:50, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: No substance of WP:GNG here and nothing useful comes from a search for other sources. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:21, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Preeni Withanage

Preeni Withanage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notwithstanding that the page was accepted through the AFC process, I don't think this subject is notable. None of the sources in the article seem to provide any significant coverage of her as a person; she is often quoted in her official capacity as a representative of NERD and other organisations. I haven't found anything else of use for meeting WP:GNG; there's this interview, but again that's really about the government policy rather than about her. Nothing suggesting any of the WP:ANYBIO criteria are met. Chocmilk03 (talk) 08:45, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Science, Engineering, and Sri Lanka. Chocmilk03 (talk) 08:46, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

  Keep. I understand the concern that several sources quote Withanage in her official capacity. However, I think there is enough independent coverage to warrant considering WP:GNG. In particular, the 20 June 2017 Daily Mirror article gives substantial coverage to her analysis and recommendations concerning LNG pricing, infrastructure costs and Sri Lanka's long-term electricity-generation plan, rather than merely mentioning her. There is also an extended 2019 Echelon interview, as well as independent coverage of her petroleum-sector work in The Island, Daily Mirror and Tamil Guardian over multiple years.

  I acknowledge that many of these reports focus on the policies and projects she was involved in rather than providing a conventional biographical profile, but I believe the cumulative independent coverage is substantial enough for the subject to meet GNG. Grove317 (talk) 21:57, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 12:12, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• @Grove317: The 2017 Daily Mirror article merely quotes her as an expert on a topic, it doesn't provide any significant coverage about her as a person. I also specifically mentioned the Echelon interview in my nomination (sorry, I'd missed that it was included in the article already); the entire content of that interview is about Sri Lanka's natural gas policy. Neither of those articles supports notability under WP:GNG. Chocmilk03 (talk) 22:14, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

  Keep. I accept that none of the sources identified so far is a conventional biographical profile. However, I think the cumulative sourcing deserves consideration. Withanage has received recurring coverage over more than a decade in independent publications including The Sunday Times, The Island, Daily Mirror, Daily FT, EconomyNext and Echelon, concerning her engineering work, petroleum regulation, natural-gas policy and offshore exploration. In the Sri Lankan context, detailed biographical profiles of engineers and technical public officials appear relatively uncommon, particularly compared with coverage available for comparable professionals in larger media markets. I think the sustained, multi source coverage should be assessed cumulatively rather than requiring a single profile article devoted entirely to the subject. Grove317 (talk) 23:39, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

  I would also note that the article has already gone through the Articles for Creation process and was accepted into mainspace after review. Taken together with the sustained coverage across multiple independent publications over many years, I think that prior review is relevant context when assessing whether the article should be retained. Grove317 (talk) 23:43, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

  @Grove317: Can you point to anything in any of those articles that is about Withanage as a person, other than naming her and her job title or quoting her? Chocmilk03 (talk) 02:40, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Institute of Apparel Management

Institute of Apparel Management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This private training institute does not meet WP:NORG. None of the cited sources gives the significant, independent, secondary coverage required by WP:ORGCRIT. Moarnighar (talk) 12:10, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related AfD discussions. Moarnighar (talk) 12:10, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Bangladesh. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:58, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Emani 22

Emani 22 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A stub page about a deceased musician that lacks WP:GNG, WP:MUSICBIO and WP:REFERENCE, which makes it vulnerable for an AFD. Darrion N. Brown 🙂 (my talk page / my sandbox) 17:55, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, Women, Music, United States of America, and California. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 18:03, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment. There's lots of news coverage of her death in a car crash, much of which describes her as a potentially notable musician. However I'm having trouble finding much sigcov prior to her death, or about her music. pburka (talk) 15:08, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

  A lot of her music had 100s of thousands of listeners. Even if she is less famous now, she still has a lot of coverage with songs of emani's interlude as a feature, and has amased arge social platforms wth 100s of thousands of followers. ~2026-51183-42 (talk) 15:33, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

  Can you provide some examples of coverage of her songs in reliable sources? pburka (talk) 15:39, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. Meets WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV, as she received numerous obituaries written by notable news agencies. She received notable obituaries from the news agencies People, TheWrapand Billboard. Her article provides biographical information about her, and as well about her career, and I also found a VoyageLA article from 2018. I also see that her article focuses more on her life and career in text. MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 20:34, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to A Love Letter to You 3 as an WP:ATD. I cannot find anything substantial except obits. The VoyageLA article linked above is an interview. Kelob2678 (talk) 07:19, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 08:42, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep per WP:NMUSIC - Fire Starter, a song which she was a featured artist on, charted on Billboard Bubbling Under. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 22:52, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to A Love Letter to You 3 - unbalanced ratio of words and citations. SH360! (Must edit! Must report!) 11:02, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

I don't think having an "unbalanced ratio of words and citations" is an actual explanation for why you're voting for a redirect. MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 14:39, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

@SlapstickHumor360!:, do you have an actual explanation of why you actually voted for redirect? You used that same sentence for Maggiano, DiGirolamo & Lizzi. Your vote is not really an answer, as having an "unbalanced ratio of words and citations" is not really an argument of why the article should be redirected. Being a stub is not a reason for deletion and for redirect. MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 23:43, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

• Keep She received so much coverage after her death for a reason. A redirect to A Love Letter to You 3 would not make sense as she had her own body of work, as the write up in Respect (magazine) shows: . Thriley (talk) 18:07, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

  This is a 96-word announcement of a song. Kelob2678 (talk) 21:24, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:53, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: I don't see a pass at musical notability. Coverage is entirely about her death, with nothing that I can find before that. No charted singles, no major awards, no songs used in major TV shows or movies; outside of the obituaries, there is no sourcing found. If this person were still alive and we remove all the sources about the death, this wouldn't pass notability as there is little to no coverage found. Oaktree b (talk) 18:49, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Immigrant entrepreneurship

Immigrant entrepreneurship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Potentially LLM written article that's mostly just an essay about a vague and broad topic instead of an article about a well established concept. "Immigrant entrepreneurship" can be anything. Cubnorth (talk) 23:33, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Business-related AfD discussions. Cubnorth (talk) 23:33, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Suspected AI-generated articles-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:01, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - per nom. This might shed some light. — Iadmc♫^talk  06:45, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep with reduction. Immigrant entrepreneurship is a widely accepted term and the subject of a substantial body of academic research. I rewrote the article in my sandbox, simplifying the prose and reducing its length by more than 50%, then replaced the live article. I also added a definition section to help clarify the concept. I believe the revised version addresses the concerns raised and is much more conducive to other editors expanding, restructuring, or rewriting the article as needed. The subject is specifically studied and tracked by organisations including the OECD, which includes a dedicated section of its International Migration Outlook 2 to the subject, and is the focus of a specific chapter in Elsevier's Handbook of the Economics of International Migration, among many other major academic publications. This is precisely the type of significant subject that Wikipedia should include. Its prominence can be quickly verified through searches of Google and JSTOR.

Wikipedia contains many obscure subjects that may legitimately warrant articles, but this is an established and important area of study that deserves inclusion because of it encompases such a broad range. The sources I have provided are all strong academic publications devoted again specifically to the subject. Even the source provided by ladmc, the German Historical Institute's Immigrant Entrepreneurship project covering immigrant entrepreneurship in American history broadly, reinforces the importance and established use of the term.

That said, although I am strongly opposed to LLM generated content, I recognise that my writing style may resonate with this issue. My writing also tends toward an essay style, which is something I have done professionally since long before AI existed and is a legitimate complaint by other editors. I am trying to work this out of my writing in general. I believe this may be partly because I develop highly polished articles. I made nearly 300 edits on Wikipedia developing this article, (not what you find in LLM generated content) and probably an equal amount of the work was done outside Wikipedia because I find it considerably easier to structure, move material around that way.

My proposed solution is the normal one for a notable subject where the article faces such concerns, that is to substantially reduce it. Over the next few days, during this discussion, I intend to shorten the prose considerably, probably by about half, while retaining as much of the existing structure and sourcing as possible.

One problem on Wikipedia is that articles can grow through incremental additions until they become sprawling and unorganised. I would like to leave this article with well developed structure but limited prose that makes it conducive to future contributions by other editors, while retaining the substantial academic sourcing that provides a foundation for future expansion. This is an approach I plan on taking in all of my future writing, limited prose with strong structure.

I appreciate the work done by all editors, including those critcal of my work JondeJon1 (talk) 13:05, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

I want to elaborate a little more as the nominator. There is no one unique thing that ties the information in this article together except for 'immigrants can be entrepreneurs'. This means that in my opinion, that's all the article is really saying. If the observations that followed were conclusive and uniform, then I'd understand a bit more, but as it stands almost all of them boils down to 'it varies', which is obvious. I respect that this is an area of interest for you, but as it stands I believe this topic is far too broad to be a useful article. Cubnorth (talk) 13:24, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

I understand the concern that the subject is broad, but I think that breadth is also what makes it valuable as an encyclopedia topic. Wikipedia benefits when it covers important central concepts, not just narrowly defined subjects. The study of immigrant entrepreneurship has considerable importance within sociology and social economics, which is why there is such substantial academic literature devoted to it.

The difficulty for me has been presenting the body of material without turning the article into an essay or adding my own synthesis. I could write a more cohesive argument connecting the research, but that would not be appropriate for Wikipedia. The article needs to be built from what the sources actually say, which can make it difficult to present the material cohesively.

At the same time, I am addressing the perception of LLM-assisted writing in the typical manner, by substantially reducing the prose and making the article more direct and source-focused. This often works against your concern, since reducing the prose can also make it harder to explain the connections among the research. I will post a rewritten version in the next few hours.

I understand where you are coming from, but I think this is a case where creative editing and restructuring can solve the problems. It would be a shame to lose an important area of study that belongs in an encyclopedia when the underlying subject and sourcing are very strong.JondeJon1 (talk) 08:05, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio ^giuliano 06:33, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:NEWLLM. The topic is notable, but the article is AI-generated. Kelob2678 (talk) 06:44, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

  I did try and shorten the article substantially to alleviate LLM concerns which is a common way to deal with these problems, it also addressed my tendency towards writing essays. It would be a shame to lose a good topic well sourced by academic citations.JondeJon1 (talk) 14:25, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Comment what the indications of AI generation here, still learning!AadamentAardvark (talk) 03:29, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
• Additional comment The rewriting has unfortunately not changed my stance that the topic is too broad to say anything meaningful. Cubnorth (talk) 11:44, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

  If anything is salvageable from this, I'd suggest a merge to Middleman minority or Model minority

  CSGinger14 (talk) 01:39, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:45, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Clans of Baganda

Clans of Baganda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose a limited merge of sourced encyclopedic content to Baganda#Clan_structure because, while an encyclopedic article can probably be written on this topic, this article is a massive pile of unsourced original research and thus fails the WP:NOT test of WP:GNG. No prejudice against a properly sourced and researched article being written on this topic in the future. Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:57, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups and Uganda. Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:57, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Merge WP:SELECTIVELY per nominator's rationale. FaviFake (talk) 19:35, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep as the article itself is very detailed and properly written, even though it lacks proper sourcing. I'd suggest that the page be worked on and more secondary sources be added to it instead of merging it as per nom. Farhanansari1994 (talk) 15:34, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

  What are the sources that would support this page, and why does this unsourced page as it stands pass the WP:NOT test of WP:GNG? Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:40, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:44, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Merge selectively per nom. Standalone article not needed as Baganda#Clan_structure section can cover the article topic. Dylan Reed (Ping me) 02:18, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

List of Trivial Pursuit editions

List of Trivial Pursuit editions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to Trivial Pursuit because it is seemingly an indiscriminate list. (Oinkers42) (talk) 00:18, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Games and Lists. (Oinkers42) (talk) 00:18, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: Irrespective of the final decision, that list needs to be wholly reformatted if it is retained. It currently combines the worst features of tables with the worst features of definition lists into one terribly-formatted and unsortable sequence of entries. I suggest a table with eight columns (edition name, release year, and the six coloured ovals with a matching colour name in text for the categories). Also remove text such as "very hard to find", which is irrelevant here. Mindmatrix 15:43, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: ProQuest returns nearly 60,000 hits for the term "Trivial Pursuit" (in quotation marks), so there should be sufficient sources to potentially flesh out this list or convert it into its own article (say, Editions of Trivial Pursuit), as merging wholesale into the parent would likely overwhelm that article. Mindmatrix 15:43, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Comment If merged into the Editions section of Trivial Pursuit, the updated table should be collapsible so it won't overwhelm the article. And then the Trivial Pursuit Millennium Edition page should probably be considered for deletion, since it's already covered in this list. SupermarketCake (talk) 23:12, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

MOS:COLLAPSE is a tad wishy-washy, but makes clear that we should not collapse article content. So, if this was added to Trivial Pursuit, it would stand strong in its uncollapsed glory. Given that would be... awkward, it recommends making a separate article (well... what do we have here). This list isn't indiscriminate in anyway, it has clear criteria (be an edition of Trivial Pursuit). It meets NLIST as useful, and has also been treated as a class by secondary sources . (The Gamer is WP:VALNET, whose sources can't normally be used to provide notability, but I have no clue how that interacts with NLIST, and The Gamer is generally regarded as more reliable than other VALNET publications.) So, keep 1brianm7 (talk) 07:06, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio ^giuliano 06:44, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep and cleanup - Formatting is hellish, but the list does have clear criteria, is useful and has available support by secondary sources so can't see rationale to get rid of it entirely. Merging is not a suitable alternative as it would overwhelm target article.

BleachPuffin (talk) 12:22, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• weak keep per BleachPuffin. This isn't indiscriminate (criteria are clear and finite), and that's the only reason given for the redirect. Week because I'm not personally sure we need this, but eh. Hobit (talk) 03:07, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
• Found these sources: Wargamer.com: , Encyclopædia Britannica: , Business Insider: , Encyclopedia.com: (last 2 paragraphs), Canadian Museum of History: (2nd to last paragraph), review of a specific edition by Pop Insider: (author has written for Travel + Leisure, Observer, etc). --Mika1h (talk) 18:07, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

  Most of these sources barely cover the editions, mostly just saying "there are a lot of themed editions of Trivial Pursuit". Not really seeing the need to create an exhaustive list of every themed edition of a game. (Oinkers42) (talk) 21:36, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:24, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Comment - Article is now in a far cleaner state than it was when it was originally proposed and that Mindmatrix, and SupermarketCake commented on and 1brianm7 voted keep on. Version originally proposed for redirection. Still believe that this article should be kept, but current format does a much better job of showing the information itself so it is probably easier to make a judgement as to whether the article is worthwhile.

Regardless of result of this proposal, at the risk of encountering the wrath of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, I suggest that the six separate pages for Monopoly editions are proposed for same fate (either cleanup, or redirection). BleachPuffin (talk) 15:34, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Bilguun Oyuntsetseg

Bilguun Oyuntsetseg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is this page needed? It doesn't redurect to any other project with actual article, and only links to Wikidata page. It's first time I even see something like this, and there are millions of pages on Wikidata which do not have articles on Englihs Wikipedia. Personally I do not think this template should be used like that. Artemis Andromeda (talk) 10:47, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Mongolia-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:59, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Ranpokunagama Maha Vidyalaya

Ranpokunagama Maha Vidyalaya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. My BEFORE didn't yield anything with SIGCOV to warrant standalone notability. Page was created by the user "Ranpokunagama Maha Vdyalaya" — it's a evident COI/UPE case too. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 10:27, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Sri Lanka. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 10:27, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Capital Brewery

Capital Brewery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This business is not notable enough to warrant an article. The bulk of the information is unreferenced and I have not been able to find reliable, independent sources. I made an attempt to verify the award from the Beverage Testing Institute as well as some others, but I couldn't locate much of anything that verifies claims made in the article. I'm not aware that winning tasting competitions, even at a national level, warrant notability without independent coverage. Fails WP:NOTADVERT. S1mply.dogmom (talk) 19:39, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Business, Companies, and Wisconsin. S1mply.dogmom (talk) 19:39, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep - Being once named the best brewery in the US should earn this a keep. I added a few sources and removed some of the unsourced promotional info. TheDeafWikipedian (talk) 20:52, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete - Agree. Not enough notability for a stand-alone entry. Can be merged into a small blurb in the Middleton, WI page. HoundofBaskersville (talk) 20:03, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 09:41, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Delete Sources in article fail WP:NCORP. There was actually a decent amount of coverage on this subject, but I really struggled to find sources that were both independent and significant.

Source analysis of references in article for WP:SIRS:

1. Passports and cocktails: significant coverage, but it's a WP:BLOG, so I'm not sure on reliability.
2. The Capital Times: Should be independent and reliable, but I'm not convinced on significant coverage. Most of the article talks about the award, but very little actually about the brewery.
3. Isthmus: Trivial coverage, only two brief mentions of Capital Brewery.
4. Pioneer Press: I'm not sure on the independence of this specific article since it features a lot of quotes from the brewery's president, but the Anheuser-Busch lawsuit was (relatively) widely covered. For example, this is a better article from the same source. Also not sure on the significance, but I could see it squeaking by.
5. Baltimore Sun: Independent and reliable, but trivial coverage of Capital.
6. Isthmus2: Not significant coverage; it's about the process of a beer that was made partly by Capital, but very little on the brewery itself.
7. US Open Beer: Primary source, also covers the same thing as the capital times article.

Only reference I could find that I thought might be applicable was this one (I accessed through open athens), which covers a dismissed 2014 lawsuit from minority shareholders of the brewery. However, it doesn't really discuss the brewery itself, and even if it did count, I'm not convinced this subject passes the stricter notability guideline for companies. ExitTheWarrior (talk) 15:04, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Note: I added some archive urls to the article due to dead links and paywalls. ExitTheWarrior (talk) 15:06, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Keep revised my opinion following Oaktree b's post, which provided multiple sources that seem to be significant and independent. I agree that some of the content currently in the article could be removed (i.e. list of all their beers, at the most just have a few notable ones), but the subject is still notable. ExitTheWarrior (talk) 19:21, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: Seems to have been quite a few Capital Breweries, and older one in Wisconsin , one in Canada... Lots to sort through. Gbooks has some coverage , , , page 56 here . Could probably at least be a stub article... Seems to show up quite a bit in tourism books. Oaktree b (talk) 18:55, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Vincent Favretto

Vincent Favretto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE received through VRT, citing real-life harm from identity theft. Relatively low-profile, with the only sources cited being championship results rather than secondary sources expected for GNG. A WP:BEFORE only brings out brief mentions in local newspapers, as well as this article which I am not able to assess due to it being paywalled. Even with a few more sources of that caliber, I can't see this being more than a borderline GNG pass, meaning we should honor the subject's request for privacy. Chaotic Enby (in solidarity · talk · contribs) 08:22, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Sport of athletics. Chaotic Enby (in solidarity · talk · contribs) 08:22, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of France-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:06, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Keep: Easily passes athletic notability with the wins at the Francophonie Games and the EU juniors. Coverage is mostly in French, here as an example. I understand the identity theft, but this page can be protected to avoid deceptive editing. Oaktree b (talk) 19:02, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: Also covered here [],. Oaktree b (talk) 19:08, 6 October 2026 (UTC) duplicate source

Centrist Party of Canada

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Centrist Party of Canada
• Articles for deletion/Centrist Party of Canada (2nd nomination)

Centrist Party of Canada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously removed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Centrist_Party_of_Canada I don't see any significant media coverage or other evidence for its notability. Ureekish (talk) 05:58, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Canada. Ureekish (talk) 05:58, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related AfD discussions. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 06:04, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom – can't even find independent sourcing about the party, it's all just other groups with similar names. aesurias (she/her) (talk) 06:36, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Feda Musa Zaid Abdelhady

Feda Musa Zaid Abdelhady (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources are predominantly primary with little to no significant independent coverage. The title of ambassador does not establish notability automatically. The best coverage is interview-based news or just interviews with little journalist independent coverage of the bio. Ureekish (talk) 05:28, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bilateral relations, Palestine, Canada, and New Jersey. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 06:01, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Bhomiaji Maharaj Temple, Sopra, Bhopalgarh

Bhomiaji Maharaj Temple, Sopra, Bhopalgarh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lack of significant coverage in independent reliable sources JoyWeaver (talk) 05:24, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Religion, Hinduism, and India. JoyWeaver (talk) 05:24, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to Sopra, Bhopalgarh#Beliefs where few lines are mentioned. Just a ROTM shrine of worship in a village....found no sources having significant coverage to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 05:58, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Rajasthan-related AfD discussions. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 06:02, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect per BhikhariInformer. EM (talk) 20:03, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Youngseo

Youngseo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to AllDay Project. Fails WP:BANDMEMBER and most of the sources here are about the reality show she participated in years ago, about the band she's in, or promotional. Lots of puffery as well both in the sources and in the Wikipedia content -- e.g. writing in wikivoice that the Elle Korea source calls her a "sought-after model" even though the article explicitly says that was her first-ever solo photoshoot. I looked up her name in Hangul too and there's still no significant coverage about her; in fact most of the results are about another Youngseo, an athlete, who seems far more notable. Handsome Ellis (talk) 03:17, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related AfD discussions. Handsome Ellis (talk) 03:17, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Television, and South Korea. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:28, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to AllDay Project per the nominator's well-stated investigation. This article is clearly an attempted promotion for the performer who may achieve notability someday, but she's just barely out of the starting gate now. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:53, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Don't Have a Cow (That's So Raven)

Don't Have a Cow (That's So Raven) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to That's So Raven season 2#ep23 because the article relies on 3 listicles, with all 3 not going in depth about the episode itself. Emcgonigle (talk) 03:13, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Disney. Emcgonigle (talk) 03:13, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Hurricane Georges tornado outbreak

Hurricane Georges tornado outbreak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Hurricane Georges because there was only one significant tornado, and no fatalities as a result of the tornadoes. There were a few dozen injuries, but given Georges killed over 600 people total, I feel giving the tornado outbreak, which killed zero, its own dedicated article is WP:UNDUE given context. Also, merging the article into the main article's impacts section would likely improve the main article, as for such a significant hurricane, the impacts section is rather lacking, in large part due to the over abundance of sub-articles. IMO there wouldn't even be a need to list out all the tornadoes in the main article, just a sentence each for all the tornadoes that caused injuries. AutisticYapper (talk) 02:50, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Weather, Alabama, Florida, and Georgia (U.S. state). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:10, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Support merging to the proposed target. Lorstaking (talk) 09:10, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Support - per nomanators rational.

WXchaser (^{Say what?}) 15:15, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• As I said on the Georges talk page, I prefer the merge target be Effects of Hurricane Georges in the United States. I'm against merging all of Georges' sub-articles, as that could be over 11,000 words of content (too long). However, if this is merged into the main Georges article, then I suggest it be handled like Hurricane Frances' tornado outbreak and have the table be collapsed automatically. That way it won't add too much visual clutter to the main article. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:04, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

  Comment perhaps it could be merged to the main Georges article for now, and then the info could be moved to the Effects of Hurricane Georges in the US article once the other US articles are consolidated into that one article? A little convoluted I will admit, but we need to start cutting down some of these sub-articles for Georges. I hadn't checked the talk page before suggesting this, so apologies there. AutisticYapper (talk) 20:16, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Feminist Media Studies

Feminist Media Studies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could not find non-database secondary sources Historyexpert2 (talk) 02:47, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related AfD discussions. Historyexpert2 (talk) 02:47, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:11, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Social science. Bridget (talk) 11:19, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Keep, clear pass of WP:NJOURNALS, indexed in WOS and Scopus, and a top quartile journal in its category. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 13:16, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Keep per Headbomb. Guettarda (talk) 14:05, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Keep: per Headbomb, passes WP:JOURNALCRIT. Crazymystar (talk) 17:24, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. A Gbook search yields results that are sufficient to meet the criteria for Journal's notability. Additionally Headbomb also given a valid reason to keep the article. Dylan Reed (Ping me) 02:28, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

  Comment. Can you quote the particular result you are referring to? You just searched for the keywords feminist media studies. On the page you linked I see no secondary source about this journal. Historyexpert2 (talk) 02:53, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

'Til Death Do Us Part (Philippine TV series)

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/'Til Death Do Us Part (Philippine TV series)
• Articles for deletion/'Til Death Do Us Part (Philippine TV series) (2nd nomination)

'Til Death Do Us Part (Philippine TV series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The addition of a notability tag to this article was rejected. The previous deletion discussion rested upon stating that any television show that aired was presumed notable, which certainly isn't the case now (if it ever was). The sources cited in the original discussion were admitted to be poor at best; virtually the entire "keep" rested on that idea that aired television was definitely notable. I tried searching myself but only came up with the same sources already pointed out in that previous deletion discussion. AaronNealLucas (talk) 02:23, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Philippines. AaronNealLucas (talk) 02:23, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: for context, the first nomination was from 2008 (as the nominator already noted, our standards have changed in 18 years). No opinion on if this can meet 2026 standards. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:13, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Kelly Rian Sanson

Kelly Rian Sanson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actress; her sole major role appears to have been in Cinderella's Curse and thus fails WP:NACTOR. No evidence of passing WP:GNG either. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:05, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and England. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:05, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Women-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:29, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Weak keep - NACTOR through Cinderella in Cinderella's Curse and Olive Oyl in Popeye's Revenge - the second one is slightly borderline, but I'd say it's a major enough role as a main antagonist. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 22:38, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Olive Oyl appears to be a minor role in that movie, making her fall short of NACTOR. Dclemens1971 (talk) 22:55, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

At least from reviews like this one she seems to be major, and the plot synopsis also seems to depict her as the second main antag - not as much screentime as Popeye but I do still think that's enough. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 21:48, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:07, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People and United Kingdom. AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 01:11, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: I don't think it meets NACTOR per nom from her roles. - TurquoiseGoose•they/them•(talk) 04:08, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - for a current performer we must have two or three sources of in-depth significant coverage (BLP) - roles are not really relevant Geschichte (talk) 05:26, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Lycée Français International de Delhi

Lycée Français International de Delhi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:33, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Delhi. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:30, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: Found a couple sources , , and . Although I doubt they consititute SIGCOV. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 15:37, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

@Dz5t 8O12: The standard of SIGCOV depends on how much commentary each source makes about the subject. From WP:SIGCOV: ""Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material." So if the source only has a single sentence about the school, that is not SIGCOV. If it has two paragraphs about the school, that is SIGCOV.

• In "4-yr-old boy ‘locked in dark room, tortured’. Delhi kindergarten horror in French embassy premises" I don't see an extended discussion on the Lycee itself, so I don't think it counts as SIGCOV.
• "French International School now open for Indian students" does have SIGCOV as the main topic of the article is about how it now has space for Indian students. If The Asian Age is a reliable source (if it has proper fact-checking processes) that would be great!
• "French International School in Delhi now open for Indian students" is also SIGCOV as the LFID is the main topic of that article. While The Economic Times is not listed in Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources my understanding is that it should be a reliable source.

So far two of the three sources have SIGCOV. If The Asian Age is an RS, I will make a keep vote.

You can look for coverage in French newspapers and magazines, including those about French expatriates, for additional coverage.

WhisperToMe (talk) 18:20, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep In addition to the sources above, there is also this review from The Good Schools Guide. Kelob2678 (talk) 17:43, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:17, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:06, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Hector Rivas

Hector Rivas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC. The business-journal and local-paper pieces are about ThriftBooks. the sports coverage is about Henry Organ or quotes him briefly as an agent. The rest are a press release, PR firm's award-semifinalist list and a Forbes contributor interview. SOFILUIZA // COMMS 16:21, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Sports, Washington, and Washington, D.C.. SOFILUIZA // COMMS 16:21, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep How does this fail WP:BASIC? He meets WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV with almost 40 citations. ThriftBooks, which he founded, is really famous and would not stand a chance of being deleted. Rivas almost became the second Jeff Bezos. His notability should be very obvious. I will let the Wikipedia article speak for itself. Naturalezas45 (talk) 17:08, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. The best sources I could find look to be a business profile with limited biographical coverage, an interview with his partner, and similar coverage with reliability or independence issues. He is not notable even if one of his businesses is. Eluchil404 (talk) 15:59, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 21:07, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:04, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

BengalOS

BengalOS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a Linux distribution. I can find very little information about this software and it does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NPRODUCT based on the sources in the article or my wider searches. In terms of the article's sources: is a page listing various softwares including this one; does not seem to be independent and is a blog linking a social media post. Chocmilk03 (talk) 23:47, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Software-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:24, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

  Other references include:

  - https://wiki.debian.org/immutable (both the distro and talks mentioning it). Note that although the source repositories are hosted on Debian infrastructure it is an independent project

  Other referencs

  - https://linmob.net/weekly-update-32-2026/ mentioning it along other distributions

  - Mention at Mobile Linux Hackday: https://www.linuxexpres.cz/aktuality/mobile-linux-hackday-8

  - Coverage on Habr: https://habr.com/ru/news/1056084/

  - Runtimewire: https://runtimewire.com/article/phosh-0-56-0-mobile-linux-immutable-updates?utm_source=chatgpt.com Blurredmobi (talk) 05:52, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

  Another talk sorting BengalOS into the phone operating system space: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b48AU0tqCwg&t=513s Blurredmobi (talk) 16:13, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

  I modeled this after KDE Linux which serves a similar role but for Desktop systems. Blurredmobi (talk) 05:55, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

  Wikipedia needs significant coverage of BengalOS, which means sources that examine it in some level of detail. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 07:41, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to Phosh, fails WP:GNG per nom and my above comment. Current article has no reliable sources so there is nothing to merge. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 07:44, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

I'd support this proposed redirect, seems a sensible target. Cheers, Chocmilk03 (talk) 07:54, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:02, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Merge to Phosh: I cannot find much of any RS about this topic to suggest it is notable enough for an independent article. Maayaaaaa (talk) 02:51, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Purili

Purili (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPRODUCT, contested draftification, only contains primary sources, and I found no mentions in reliable sources. ~ A412 ^talk! 22:30, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related AfD discussions. ~ A412 ^talk! 22:30, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related AfD discussions. ~ A412 ^talk! 22:31, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Lacks coverage in reliable sources. The engine probably was created in June 2026 and announced in this post on Reddit. Kelob2678 (talk) 22:00, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 01:00, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Baxter Kruger

Baxter Kruger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NAUTHOR. Citations are the subject's own ministry site, affiliated theology organisations and blogs. Kqol • talk 23:10, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, Authors, Religion, Christianity, and United States of America. Kqol • talk 23:10, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Scotland and Mississippi. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:31, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: I don't see anything particularly wrong with this article. Bearian (talk) 01:18, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

  Keep As Bearian noted the article seems fairly well rounded. There's a number of academic sources present, more than half of which (having not done a completely comprehensive review) I'd suspect cover the subject in at least 100 words, if not more.

  I also don't think it's reasonable to discount a fair number of the additional sources entirely simply because they're Christian organizations. Just because they're also Christian doesn't mean they're affiliated or biased in some manner when discussing the topic, that they can't discuss the individual in a neutral, detached manner (beyond the fact of their implying the existence of a God, which is an unreasonable lens for us to look at this issue from seeing as we're trying to establish notability for a theologian). I think that takes a really narrow and somewhat diminutive view of theology, which isn't really practical at all; obviously the sources covering them are going to be broadly Christianity-focused in nature. Were we hoping for an expose in the Wall Street Journal?

  CSGinger14 (talk) 00:05, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 00:57, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Come with Me 2 Hell

Come with Me 2 Hell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUM. No in-depth coverage in sources. Deletion is recommended because the album is a collaboration between two different artists, making it impossible to choose between them, and the record label issuing the album doesn't have its own Wikipedia page. Binksternet (talk) 00:56, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related AfD discussions. Binksternet (talk) 00:56, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

I am also nominating the next album for deletion for the exact same reasons. Binksternet (talk) 01:00, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Come with Me 2 Hell Part 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Redirect to Three 6 Mafia as WP:ATD. There's nothing notable about this album. WidgetKid ^Converse 02:01, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Sarfraz Khan (actor)

Sarfraz Khan (actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and NACTOR. I think making this a redirect is irrelevant at this point. Thilsebatti (talk) 00:56, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Businesspeople, and India. Thilsebatti (talk) 00:56, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: unrelated to the nominator's concerns, this has (when not blanked and redirected) been tagged as containing LLM text since August. (The page itself has existed in some form since 2012, so there are definitely non-LLM revisions, but it probably doesn't help the cause any.) No opinion. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:18, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Suspected AI-generated articles, Maharashtra, and Canada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:18, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: At minimum, the promotional VR1 Media, Acting by Sarfraz and Care Shield sections should probably all be deleted; I am leaving them in place during this discussion though. AllyD (talk) 07:10, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Weak delete or Redirect to Kader Khan. Notability is borderline with unreliable sources. He could possibly meet WP:NACTOR but it is unclear if he has had leading roles. Most of the content, including early life, education, and later career, is unsourced, and the sections on VR1 Media, Acting by Sarfraz, and Care Shield are promotional. If kept, it needs substantial work. Macdddd (talk) 20:24, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: Apart from obvious LLM written text. His work is not notable enough to meet WP:NACTOR moreover it should not be redirected to his father's page as notability is not guaranteed by association.

Cole Williams (musician)

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Cole Williams (musician)
• Articles for deletion/Cole Williams (musician) (2nd nomination)

Cole Williams (musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted in 2021 and recreated. Sources are local New Orleans outlets, his own website and YouTube. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. Kqol • talk 23:12, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Music, United States of America, and Louisiana. Kqol • talk 23:12, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Info - Note on soft closure: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it was previously discussed at AfD and the result was soft delete.

Previous discussions: 2021-03 (closed as ✗ soft delete)

Logs: 2021-03 ✗ deleted

--Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 00:55, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Vincent Olise

Vincent Olise (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. The coverage is about his son Michael Olise and mentions in passing WP:NOTINHERITED. Kqol • talk 23:16, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Cricket and Nigeria. Kqol • talk 23:16, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:18, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. Notable enough on his own as a cricket player as per. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vixissimi (talk • contribs) 23:40, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

  Corroboration of the above source in the New Nigerian archives here, here, here, here, here, and here. Vixissimi^📨 07:58, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

  cc @Jsthewikiperson Vixissimi^📨 08:15, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

  Keep. Olise is notable enough in his own right through his international cricket career. The Nigerian news archives provided by Vixissimi prove Vincent Olise is notable under WP:NCRIC. Jsthewikiperson (talk) 07:05, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 00:55, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Fawna MacLaren

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Fawna MacLaren
• Articles for deletion/Fawna MacLaren (2nd nomination)

Fawna MacLaren (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to List of Playboy Playmates of 1989 because fails WP:GNG Demt1298 (talk) 00:54, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, and Sexuality and gender. Demt1298 (talk) 00:54, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: this survived the first nomination in May 2011 because the then-nominator violated a topic ban in starting it. The closing statement indicates the door was left open for an immediate renomination, but given it took a little over 15 years to come back to AfD there clearly wasn't much hurry–but it was tagged as a potential NBIO failure that December. (No opinion on the article.). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:23, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of California-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:24, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - Fails GNG & NACTOR both. LegacyWiki (talk) 04:21, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: Lacks any SIGCOV and fails to meet notability. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 06:48, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Dorcel TV

Dorcel TV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to List of adult television channels because fails WP:GNG Demt1298 (talk) 00:45, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Popular culture, and Sexuality and gender. Demt1298 (talk) 00:45, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Europe, Netherlands, and Canada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:24, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Dianne Chandler

Dianne Chandler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to List of Playboy Playmates of 1966 because fails WP:GNG Demt1298 (talk) 00:42, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, Popular culture, and Sexuality and gender. Demt1298 (talk) 00:42, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:25, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Joe Allen (writer)

Joe Allen (writer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No credible claim to pass WP:NAUTHOR. I could only find a handful of books that have a low double digit number of reviews on amazon.

All the sources on the page appear to be primary sources. WP:BEFORE didn't turn up any WP:SIGCOV in secondary sources. Giulio 00:17, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Journalism, and Politics. Giulio 00:17, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: this has been tagged as a potential NBIO failure with COI issues since 2015. (No opinion.). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:26, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:26, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete doesn't pass WP:NAUTHOR, can't find any WP:SIGCOV of Allen or his works. Orange sticker (talk) 10:41, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: COI and It is not meeting the criteria WP:NAUTHOR. Crazymystar (talk) 17:26, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, doesn't pass WP:NAUTHOR and has been tagged since 2015 per the above comment. FiddleheadLady (talk) 00:50, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Antonio Adamo

Antonio Adamo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to List of pornographic film directors because fails to meet WP:GNG. Demt1298 (talk) 00:07, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Sexuality and gender. Demt1298 (talk) 00:07, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Italy. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:26, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Flag of Missoula, Montana

Flag of Missoula, Montana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging Flag of Missoula, Montana to Rainbow flag (LGBTQ) as the content of the former makes more sense as a part of the History section of the latter. There is no "Flag of Missoula, Montana"; "A Resolution of the Missoula City Council Recognizing the Pride Flag as an Official Flag of the City of Missoula" did not create a flag for the city, but rather it gave unprecedented recognition to the rainbow pride flag (and any variant) as an official flag. To give a similar example from my home city, the rainbow and transgender pride flags have official status in Vancouver, but they are not "flags of Vancouver". The difference here is that Missoula doesn't have its own flag.

The scope of the content then is not really a "Flag of Missoula, Montana", but the event of the rainbow pride flag being officiated by the resolution. This can easily be a paragraph on the Rainbow flag (LGBTQ) article. Yue🌙 (talk) 00:03, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, LGBTQ+ studies, and Montana. Yue🌙 (talk) 00:03, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Would your opinion be the same if we found a way to mention this unofficial flag? SenshiSun (talk) 00:46, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

@SenshiSun: My opinion would not stay the same, but not only is FOTW not a reliable source on its own, but it seems even the authors of that page are unsure if such a flag exists. Yue🌙 (talk) 05:00, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

I agree FOTW isn't enough. My efforts to try to find more information on that flag are not getting me far. SenshiSun (talk) 02:31, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

@SenshiSun: It is common practice for polities to slap a seal or emblem on a flag with a solid background and use it unofficially where an official flag should be. This is likely the case here. Yue🌙 (talk) 05:30, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:27, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• This could be mentioned at History of Missoula, Montana#Modern era but it's not notable on its own. Reywas92^Talk 13:41, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Merge to Rainbow flag (LGBTQ): More of a sentence than a paragraph, though. Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:43, 6 October 2026 (UTC)