Edge Rewrite
Jump to content

Talk:Zelle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Updating Criticism section and incorporating Regulatory action and fraud concerns content

[edit]

Hey again! I was wondering if editors would consider updating the Criticism section of this article. I understand that, as a COI editor, my perspective has some bias, but I've tried to put together a coherent and well-sourced section draft that describes all the relevant criticism Zelle has faced over the past few years. My draft incorporates some content from the Regulatory action and fraud concerns section, which I think should be folded into the Criticism section. Here is my draft:

I know I'm asking for a significant restructuring and revision of the article, so I welcome feedback from non-COI folks. I think what I've put together is good and makes for a better encyclopedia article, but I defer to the judgment of independent editors. Happy to field comments or questions below! EB at EW (talk) 23:25, 10 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Reply 26-JUN-2026

[edit]

  Edit request declined  

  • Exact, verbatim descriptions of any text and/or references to be removed needs to be given.[1]

Regards,  Spintendo  17:11, 26 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. "Template:Edit COI". Wikipedia. 30 August 2023. Instructions for Submitters: Describe the requested changes in detail. This includes the exact proposed wording of the new material, the exact proposed location for it, and an explicit description of any wording to be removed, including removal for any substitution.
Hey, User:Spintendo! I've built a little side-by-side comparison of the existing content (on the left) and my draft (on the right). As a reminder, I'm asking to fold the Regulatory action and fraud concern section into the Criticism one, which is why content from that section is included in the comparison below:
I hope this illustrates what I'm looking to achieve. I think a line-by-line justification for every single change I'm suggesting would be unreadable, but my main goals with this draft are :
  1. To consolidate existing content so that the section is easy to follow
  2. To add relevant context to existing claims (e.g. Zelle reimbursing customers targeted by certain types of scams)
  3. Removing claims that are either irrelevant (e.g. the Florida man anecdote) or unsourced (e.g. the longish paragraph about the CFPB's allegations)
I think a holistic approach is the best one for improving this section, since it's kind of a mess as-is, but perhaps I should break this request down a bit, see if I can lay it out in multiple parts. Please let me know what you think! Thanks, EB at EW (talk) 18:24, 2 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
It seems that I’m making some kind of mistake with the side-by-side comparison that should be appearing in the post above. When I test it out using the Show Preview function, it looks fine, but then I hit publish and the code breaks. Apologies for junking up the Talk page; I’m just trying to help editors better understand my request. If anybody can help me out with either the request or the technical issues I’m running into, I would very much appreciate it. Thanks! EB at EW (talk) 19:19, 2 July 2026 (UTC)Reply