Talk:Washington State Route 276

KML and jct list

Due to the uncertain nature of SR 276's route, a KML file and a junction list aren't necessary. SounderBruce 05:31, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Washington State Route 276/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 05:56, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Sometime soon. –TCN7JM 05:56, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Hatting discussion. Next time wait until the first reviewer finishes to leave comments. –TCN7JM 03:21, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Factually accurate and verifiable

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable

   Has an appropriate reference section Sainid (talk) 22:06, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Notes

The sentence "the latter averaging up to 19,000 vehicles in 2011 according to a survey conducted by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) measuring average annual daily traffic (AADT)" is confusing because I'm not sure if traffic is averaging 19,000 vehicles/year or 19,000 vehicles/day. It does include a link to the average annual daily traffic, but it would be helpful to have it explicitly stated. Sainid (talk) 22:06, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

It's per day. That's what average annual daily traffic means. I will begin a review of this later tonight. –TCN7JM 23:41, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Lead

• located in the U.S. state of Washington flows better than located in Washington, United States.
  •  Fixed

Route description

• In the second and third sentences, I'd change both uses of "in" to "at". I don't normally describe myself at being in an intersection, rather at one.
  •  Fixed
• You know what? Maybe the other guy was right. Just using "19,000 vehicles" is a bit cryptic unless you somehow reword the sentence to mention AADT first.
  •  Fixed SounderBruce 03:56, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

This is going on hold for you to fix stuff. –TCN7JM 03:38, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Passing the article. Nice job! –TCN7JM 04:00, 1 March 2013 (UTC)