Edge Rewrite
Jump to content

Talk:Wallace Monument

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by DrTM42 in topic Entry regarding statue sale

Bias

[edit]

The article is biased in favour of the statue —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.189.217.131 (talkcontribs) 30 July 2006

And later it was biased against. Either way, the whole statue section was full of editors' opinions and free of reliable sources. I've added lots of sources, and hopefully captured the controversial reception of the statue; depending on who you believe it's either "iconic" or "crap". -- Finlay McWalterTalk 19:01, 16 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Closed in the 1970s

[edit]

I recall as a child (70s) it being closed. I wanted to know when it was refurbished and opened to the public once again - 1996? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.28.242 (talk) 12:02, 25 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

A fence

[edit]

Didn't they put a fence up around the statue after it got vandalized? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.189.198.2 (talkcontribs) 00:20, 23 May 2007

More than that, a wire cage which was opened in the morning and closed when the centre was closed. I have a (lousy) photo of the statue that shows the folded cage in the background; I don't think I'll bother uploading it, as the statue is gone. I'll see if we can source something about the cage, as it's worth a mention in passing. -- Finlay McWalterTalk 16:55, 16 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
Actually it's pretty evident in the photo we show now. -- Finlay McWalterTalk 17:01, 16 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
I found a source and added it. -- Finlay McWalterTalk 19:01, 16 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Poor source

[edit]

This article's only citation is a slightly piecemeal editorial written by a junior, for the student newspaper of an American university. Is this a sound source? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Muz.hunter (talkcontribs) 23:21, 30 June 2007

It's better than when you wrote this, but that editorial really isn't a good source, and it appears to be offline anyway. I'm working on finding better sources. -- Finlay McWalterTalk 17:05, 16 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

National Wallace Monument

[edit]

It's called the National Wallace Monument, not the Wallace National Monument. Updated the article as such with reference to the official website. Cloudy (talk) 10:59, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Local Terminology

[edit]

The local student population in the 1990s often referred to the Monument as "The Knob on the Hill" in reference to its phallic appearance. Can anyone resident in the area confirm whether this still applies, and if so, is it worth noting? 79.81.209.146 (talk) 00:36, 18 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've never heard of that, and we'd need a reliable source both that it was used, and that the usage was common enough to be notable. -- Finlay McWalterTalk 16:52, 16 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Appearance section

[edit]

The description of the statue (from around this time) is lousy. The "scare quotes" are sarcastic and unencyclopedic; evidently the statue is of Wallace, no matter how bad anyone thinks the statue is. Secondly, while we can clearly say it's modelled after Mel Gibson (I'll add an Independent story to that effect shortly, as backup) the part about it not looking like "the historic face of Wallace" is garbage - we have no real idea whatever what Wallace looked like bar the most basic description (nor really anyone from the 14th Century). It doesn't look like other statues of Wallace, but they don't look like each other and none is remotely contemporary. It's clear that the statue was pretty unpopular, and one doesn't have to be Waldemar Januszczak to think it crude, but Wikipedia needs to present the description of everything in neutral terms supported by reliable sources. -- Finlay McWalterTalk 17:40, 16 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

... which I think I've now done. I confess it was hard to find a positive quote from anyone other than the visitor centre guy and the sculptor. -- Finlay McWalterTalk 19:03, 16 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Statue hate?

[edit]

No mention of why this statue is so hated. Anything so unpopular must have a referenced source as to why, I would assume. Any locals able to help? --71.110.69.206 (talk) 23:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Connections

[edit]

I notice that the article doesn't state what the statue actually has to do with the Wallace Monument. Reading between the lines I get the impression that it's where the visitor centre now stands, but the link isn't stated. Somebody who knows something about the statue should add this - or preferably, give it a separate article, given that the link to the Wallace Monument seems to be largely tangential. 109.151.135.51 (talk) 15:55, 11 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

The article reads "...who in 1997 installed it in the car park of the visitor centre at the foot of the craig", having said in the lede that the monument stands on the craig. That seems to me to be entirely clear and not at all tangential. -- Finlay McWalterTalk 12:24, 23 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Braveheart statue section appropriate?

[edit]

I question whether information on the "Braveheart statue" should still reside within this article. The statue has been removed, and has a life independent of the monument. This article could include information from when the statue was there (as that is part of the monument's history). If more information on the statue is warranted, I would think one of the following options would be more appropriate:

  1. ) Information about the Braveheart statue put on the Braveheart page
  2. ) An independent article for the Braveheart statue
  3. ) Information on the sculptor's article (if it exists)

My opinion would be it should go on the Braveheart article, as it seem like more of a homage to the film, not actually to William Wallace. But then again, everything I know about this comes from this single article. *Seen a Mike* 21:32, 13 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Freedom statue in a cage??

[edit]

The article states that the unpopular Mel Gibson 'Freedom' statue kept getting vandalised "before being placed in a cage to prevent further damage". I know there is discussion further up this talk page about it from 2009, but I can't find any source or images to back this up. Has someone with a good sense of humour added this to the article or what?! LoveEverybodyUnconditionally (talk) 23:39, 5 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Here's a Scotsman story showing the statue with the cage in the background (the cage was opened in the morning, and closed at night - . A similar photo is in the Ardrossan and Salcoats Herald here. Actual photo of the cage closed here. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 00:20, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Thanks - that last photo is gold. LoveEverybodyUnconditionally (talk) 04:06, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Fork?

[edit]

We might fork the Braveheart statue section out to Statue of William Wallace, Brechin. There are news sources about the relocation and a Reception section could be added as well: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/braveheart-statue-brechin-memes-twitter-b1915174.html ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:56, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Entry regarding statue sale

[edit]

The sale of the Braveheart art piece never went through. The artwork is commemorative of the film Braveheart. In the scheme of things, reference to some potential sale of the statue to Donald Trump in 2008 is not relevant to the entry and should be considered for removal. DrTM42 (talk) 03:57, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply