Edge Rewrite
Jump to content

Talk:Vittorio Angelone

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Chippla360 in topic Declined draft

Declined draft

[edit]

Hi @Chippla360, thanks for reviewing the draft. Can I ask, in your review comment you said there's no Independent reliable secondary source... Would you not consider the Times article (this one) to be both independent and reliable? There is also a source from The Northern Echo (here), and while this is a local newspaper, it has a High factuality rating from Media Bias/Fact Check. Reviews in Chortle and by Brian Logan, The Guardian's comedy reviewer, also tend to be good indicators of notability for comedian BLPs. Pineapple Storage (talk) 15:26, 22 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

I was looking for independent secondary source with significant coverage. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 02:31, 23 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
... Okay, so you would classify those sources as not being independent? Or not being significant coverage? (Bearing in mind they all exclusively discuss Angelone...) Just trying to understand the logic here. Pineapple Storage (talk) 02:39, 23 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Can you point out two source with significant coverage about the subject? Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 02:45, 23 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
not even an active link source isn’t covering basic facts about the subject Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 02:48, 23 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for pointing out the issue with the Times link, it has been moved since I accessed it on 21 June; here is the new link (but the original archive link still works, so hopefully you had a look at that). As mentioned above, the Northern Echo article is also exclusively about Angelone. Pineapple Storage (talk) 02:54, 23 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
(The Times website is paywalled, but the archive link is fully accessible.) Pineapple Storage (talk) 02:55, 23 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
The Times link is full of quotes and the writing is puffy, not an WP:RS Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 02:59, 23 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
I mean, The Times is a generally reliable source, and the article contains a lot of quotes because the author interviewed the subject... Can you point me to any specific peacock terms in the article (written by the author, not direct quotes from Angelone)? Pineapple Storage (talk) 03:09, 23 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
If there are genuine WP:PUFFERY issues then obviously that's an issue, but I really can't see any in that article. Pineapple Storage (talk) 03:18, 23 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Chippla360 Just to let you know, I've resubmitted the draft, as I disagree with the notability concerns you raised in your original review. Per Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Reviewing instructions#Rejecting submissions, if this article were already in mainspace, I don't think an AfD would end in 'Delete' (let alone be an uncontroversial delete), because even a cursory search for sources reveals plenty of independent WP:RS about the subject. Pineapple Storage (talk) 09:20, 24 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Don’t worry; ask other reviewers for feedback, this is not independent of the subject, likely an Interview Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 08:43, 26 June 2025 (UTC)Reply