Talk:VV Pernis

Football: Netherlands / Variants / Women's football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Dutch football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the football variants task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Women's association football portal This article is supported by the women's football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands

Women's sport: WOSO Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Women's association football portal This article is supported by the Women's football / soccer task force.

Proposed merge of DOTO into VV Pernis

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Door Ontwikkeling Tot Ontspanning is a stub that represents a club that has merged into VV Pernis. One article is sufficient. gidonb (talk) 22:57, 11 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Comment. Since there has been no input on the suggested merger by anyone since May, asking for some input from both articles' other editors User:Onel5969, User:Gjs238, User:Wrangel2017, User:Sb008, User:Gruesome Gary, User:Fram, User:William Avery, User:Dave.Dunford,User:A18919, User:Falcon8765, and User:Zadus. Thank you for adding your opinions! gidonb (talk) 02:35, 7 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Merge - definitely, that's how we usually treat articles like this when one is simply a perpetual stub.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:14, 7 September 2020 (UTC)Reply