Talk:Two People and One Person

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Two People and One Person/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Veyhola (talk · contribs) 17:53, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Reviewer: OpalYosutebito (talk · contribs) 03:27, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi! I'll be sure to start the review tomorrow. It's good to see you again! :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:27, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Maybe I'm just sleep-deprived, but in the lead, would "infamous" be considered puffery? If so, please remove it - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:29, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Fixed Veyhola (talk) 23:18, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks! I noticed that one of the copyvio checks is nearing 40%, but I'll excuse that if it's just for one quote :) - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 14:29, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Source 7 doesn't verify The episode was directed by Ryōta Hoshikawa, while its script was written by Akira Kindaichi, and its storyboard drawn by Yuka Kuroda. "Two People and One Person" was broadcast on TV Tokyo and its affiliates on February 22, 2026. - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:49, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

The reviews are well-sourced, but my only problem is that the quotes are too close to the original text. Please see E.T.: Interplanetary Mission#Reception for an example on how to integrate quotes into the prose - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:52, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Also, I'm unsure if we should use Wikipedia as a source, even if it's just for the number of episodes up until that point... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:53, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

@Veyhola pardon the ping, but it's been three days since I last checked in, and I'd like to wrap up the review soon :) - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 15:19, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Ok done Veyhola (talk) 16:23, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Checklist

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Spotcheck per source

1. 
2. 
3. 
4. 
5. 
6. 
7. 
8. 
9. 
10. 

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.