Talk:Tonnie Cusell
Add topic| This article was nominated for deletion on October 12 2011. The result of the discussion was delete. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Request from Tonnie Cusell Lilipaly
[edit]Hello, I am Tonnie Cusell, the subject of this article. I have reviewed the current version and found that it contains incorrect or incomplete information. User Kakehan previously contributed a more accurate version, based on reliable facts and sources.
I respectfully request that the article be revised to reflect the more accurate version provided by Kakehan.
If that is not possible, and the current version cannot be corrected, I would prefer the article to be removed altogether, as it misrepresents me.
Thank you for your time and understanding.
— Tonnie Cusell
For reference, the version contributed by user Kakehan on 1 May 2025 can be viewed here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tonnie_Cusell&oldid=1288241297 TonnieCusellLilipaly (talk) 16:01, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
- @TonnieCusellLilipaly: The problem with KakehanMaluku's edit is no citations were added nor a valid reason given for existing content and citation removal. So its addition violates Wikipedia's policy of wp:verifiability (WP:V). The existing citations were removed without a valid reason which is unacceptable per Wikipedia's policy of WP:NOBLANK. KakehanMaluku's wp:edit summary (ES) of
Due to new research and interviews from the past and present, the page content has been adjusted with modified information. Please add information instead of restoring it. Thanks for the effort and cooperation. Kind regards
is not a valid reason for its removal. No evidence nor citations for the "new research and interviews" was given, so it does not meet WP:V. If citations were added with the content, the existing history and categories need to stay. Unless, of course, evidence is given for it being in error. Such evidence should be discussed on this page, not user pages. See help:talk pages and wp:talk page guidelines. - Also, KakehanMaluku's repeated deletions and additions of the same content repeatedly violates Wikipedia's policy against wp:Edit warring. Also, repeatedly added the same messages on their talk page. Does not understand that the wp:BURDEN is on KakehanMaluku for evidence. wp:DIDNTHEARTHAT Thank you Adakiko (talk) 02:37, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (sports and games) articles
- Low-importance biography (sports and games) articles
- Sports and games work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class football articles
- Unknown-importance football articles
- Stub-Class football in the Netherlands articles
- Unknown-importance football in the Netherlands articles
- Football in the Netherlands task force articles
- WikiProject Football articles

