Talk:To a Kinder World

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:To a Kinder World/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Cukie Gherkin (talk · contribs) 23:15, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: Z. Patterson (talk · contribs) 23:59, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

I will be reviewing the article. Z. Patterson (talk) 23:59, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Article appears to have no copyright violations per the copyvio detector. Z. Patterson (talk) 00:09, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

@Cukie Gherkin: The article appears to be well-written, well-illustrated, verifiable with no original research, stable, neutral, and broad in its coverage. However, I have some points to address.

• Per WP:VALNET, Comic Book Resources sources after 2016 are generally not reliable. Would you mind finding a source to replace the CBR source?
• The caption, "Japanese voice actress Kikuko Inoue spoke of an experience where she feared for her own daughter's life, which inspired her performance as Acrobatic Silky, particularly her breathing" needs a full stop.

• Done

• Perhaps we could find a better way to phrase "pulling it off"?
• One of the sources you provided for the sentence "'To a Kinder World' was first broadcast on MBS, TBS and other JNN stations as part of the Super Animeism Turbo broadcast block on November 15, 2024" has November 14 listed. That source is ダンダダン：第7話「優しい世界へ」　アイラが絶命！？窮地にアクさらが驚きの提案. Mantan Web (in Japanese). November 14, 2024. Retrieved November 20, 2024. Either find another source that supports the November 15 date instead of that source or remove it.

• I'd originally listed it as November 14, but, like with another episode, I found it changed to November 15. I found a source verifying the November 15 date. My best guess as to why the source says November 14 is that the block starts on the 14th and goes into the 15th, but that's just a complete shot in the dark.

• Citations should be put in numerical order. One example is the phrase "It was also considered as one of the best episodes of the year". Also, unless you are quoting from the same source, there is no need to have two consecutive citations be the same source, as I see in the sentence that has that same phrase.
• Instead of "he was moved to tears", perhaps could we say, "he felt sad"?
• If you quote from a sentence, you should place a citation at the end of the sentence. Either add a citation to the end of the sentence, "He praised Matsunaga and Enomoto for making one of the 'finest pieces of animated artistry' he has seen in a long time, calling it a 'perfect episode of television'", or paraphrase the quotes in that sentence. Another example of such a sentence is "Anime Corner writer Jay Gibbs commended the implementation of the POV scene with Silky, arguing that the desperation behind the scene humanized her and made the fight with Silky feel less like it was with a 'spirit meddling with human affairs.'"
• I would replace instances of "while" with another word. See MOS:OP-ED.

• Worded it more directly and less editorially

• I would be wary of Game Rant per WP:VALNET.

If you make these changes, I plan to make this a good article. One final thing I would like to say is that although Screen Rant is marginally reliable per WP:VALNET, I would suggest finding higher quality sources than Screen Rant, if you can. I am not going to make changing Screen Rant sources a condition of good article promotion, but this is a suggestion. Z. Patterson (talk) 01:17, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

I placed this on hold. I will give you seven days to address these issues. Z. Patterson (talk) 01:18, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

I see you made some changes, and I made remaining changes myself. I will pass this as a good article. Z. Patterson (talk) 10:44, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Peer review

To a Kinder World

I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to bring this article to featured status and wish to know what is most important to address in order to accomplish that.

Thanks, Cukie Gherkin (talk) 22:18, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

Ollifant

• list the writer of the episode in the lead

  Done

• "The episode premiered on MBS and TBS on November 15, 2024, and was released shortly thereafter on streaming platforms such as Crunchyroll, Hulu, and Netflix internationally." I don't think calling every single platform is needed in the lead

  Done

• Also "such as" implies more streamers had it when the body only lists those three

  Fixed

• I'd remove the "See also: Dandadan § Plot" as most episode articles don't include one. Is there any reason why its justified here?

  I've not made any episodes aside from another Dandadan episode (and a Futurama episode a decade ago); I included it because I thought that the reader may benefit from seeing the general plot summary, since it is a somewhat complicated plot. I'm not married to including it, however

• I'd link yokai in the plot summary

  Done

• Any numbers on viewership?

  Nothing I can see; closest I can find is general viewership of the series, and even then, not with any specificity.

• Under reception "Anime News Network" is italicized on the first mention but not on the second, these should be consistent.

  Fixed

• Screen Rant typically isn't seen as an FA (or sometimes GA/FL) quality source, why is it's inclusion justified here?

  Removed Valnet content. The only one I thought might be valuable to include would be the Hideo Kojima mention since it's verifiable due to it being a tweet, but it's no huge loss.

Thats why I found, feel free to ping me for any follow up questions Olliefant (she/her) 17:25, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Comment

What makes Screen Rant and Game Rant "high-quality reliable sources"? UpTheOctave! • 8^va? 00:47, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Opted to remove Valnet sources, including some content that I could not attribute to a different source. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 01:50, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Crystal Drawers

Great article! Very FA-able, my only concern is the use of the word “screenshot” in the infobox. I feel changing it to “still from the episode” would be more professional Crystal Drawers (talk) 17:04, 14 November 2025 (UTC)