Talk:Thomas Wran

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 3 August 2021 by reviewer Theroadislong (talk · contribs).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Australia: Sydney Low‑importance

	Australia portal Thomas Wran is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Sculpture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture

Wran

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Where do people get their information from I am a relative and want to know the true 49.180.124.180 (talk) 05:20, 24 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Essay-like

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Parts of the article are opinionated and present value judgments and conclusions, sometimes even without references that may or may not make the same judgments. I'm thinking of turns of phrase such as "charming bird subjects", "may explain his openness [...]. It may well have eased his way forward and pushed his talent and help to explain Wran's endless invention.", "arguably of less intrinsic artistic significance", "It is remarkable", "Without question the masterpiece", "palpable physicality" and the entire section The Victorian achievement. Earlier, the text was even more unambiguous. I don't know the specific topic (I followed a link from Neville Wran, after following a link from... etc) so it's possible that this represents the consensus among architectural historians, but I think the text would benefit from review. Essin (talk) 14:19, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply