This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Celts, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CeltsWikipedia:WikiProject CeltsTemplate:WikiProject CeltsCelts
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This seems to be a duplicate of the Taurisci article. If Teurisci and Taurisci are the same, it seems that the form Taurisci is more common, as it has much more Google and Google Books hits. --Codrin.B (talk) 17:11, 14 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Disagree. A dablink would be more appropriate. In many cases, as with the Volcae, two Gallic tribes shared the same name. Unless we can show that both are the same tribe, then we should have separate articles. 96.231.17.131 (talk) 18:20, 1 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
