Talk:Temple of ECK
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 3 months ago by Dclemens1971 in topic Did you know nomination
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A fact from Temple of ECK appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 April 2026 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:07, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
( )
... that thousands of residents of Chanhassen, Minnesota, opposed the construction of the Temple of ECK (pictured)?- ALT0b: ... that hundreds of residents of Chanhassen, Minnesota, opposed the construction of the Temple of ECK (pictured)?
5x expanded by Darth Stabro (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 63 past nominations.
~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 18:38, 16 March 2026 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Article is new enough and long enough (tool notwithstanding, given that it reads the geolocation poorly). Copyvio tool shows no issues. Couldn't quite read the clipping, so AGF there. I am not sure on the hook fact, however. Signing a petition for something is not necessarily being against something else. If the source supports the petition actively opposing ECK, great, the article should reflect that. If not, we need a new hook. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:33, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492: would swapping "thousands" to "hundreds" be acceptable, referring to the first petition? ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 14:11, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, that would be good. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:16, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- Alright, edited! ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 14:22, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, that would be good. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:16, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492: would swapping "thousands" to "hundreds" be acceptable, referring to the first petition? ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 14:11, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
Thank you. ALT0b approved! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:37, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Religion articles
- Low-importance Religion articles
- Start-Class New religious movements articles
- Low-importance New religious movements articles
- New religious movements articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- Start-Class Architecture articles
- Low-importance Architecture articles
- Start-Class Minnesota articles
- Low-importance Minnesota articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles

