This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
I feel that the descriptions along with character information was very good. I feel that it could be livened up slightly with an image or two but with circumstances and the type of character the Bio was well done. Tnadolny (talk) 18:25, 3 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
I'm not sure if this article has actually been worked on or not, according to the history page there doesn't seem to have been anything done by the users as listed on the course page. However, I do agree with the review below. There is room for organization through section headings as well as including more information on the character and her role in the show. MtADorey (talk) 17:42, 24 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
This article is okay. Somethings that lack are pictures of the character, external links into the some of the places/topics/individuals who are involved or who are mentioned. Also it would be nice for the article to be a little more organized, especially the inclusion of sub-headings, but a picture is definitely needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TLang12345 (talk • contribs) 15:04, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply