Edge Rewrite
Jump to content

Talk:Star of Bethlehem

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by AndyTheGrump in topic Article review

Good articleStar of Bethlehem has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 28, 2006Good article nomineeListed
June 8, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 3, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

Shepherds outside > not during winter?

[edit]

The Biblical account mentions shepherds tending their flocks outside - which makes a December date improbable - i.e., June would be much more appropriate. [A fair number of writers have mentioned this point]. --DLMcN (talk) 18:58, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

The shepherds are not mentioned in Matthew (only in Luke). Therefore they likely have not been there at the same time as the wise men. According to Matthew, Herod had all children under the age of two killed. However, this only makes sense if Jesus is no longer a newborn. The wise men therefore only came to Bethlehem some time later. And this could well have taken place in winter. 25 December would then not be the actual date of birth, but the time when Jesus was honoured as king for the first time. CHrist1291 (talk) 09:16, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

We have an article on the site about Raymond Brown

[edit]

The late Fr. Raymond E. Brown is cited in the article as the author of some source publications. - knoodelhed (talk) 04:23, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Spiritual meaning if a star if Bethlehem flower

[edit]

. 197.92.29.51 (talk) 20:01, 14 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Article review

[edit]

It has been a while since this article was reviewed, so I took a look and noticed the following:

  • There are two orange banners on top of "Regulus, Jupiter, and Venus" outlining WP:OR and WP:SYNTH concerns.
  • There are uncited statements in the article.
  • The article relies upon large amounts of block quotes, and sometimes there's little explanation of their context. These should be summarised instead of quoted with more context given.

Should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 14:53, 6 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

It's time for Wikipedia to delist this page among the featured good articles. ~2026-38060-60 (talk) 12:23, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Given that the las GA assessment appears to have taken place in 2009, it would certainly merit reassessment. AndyTheGrump (talk) 12:32, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply