Talk:Spitak

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

Armenia

	Spitak is within the scope of WikiProject Armenia, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Armenia and Armenians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArmeniaWikipedia:WikiProject ArmeniaTemplate:WikiProject ArmeniaArmenian
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator.

Revert

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

@Toghrul R can you explain your recent edit on this article? You removed a lot of info, stating 'restoring sourced version', when it was the opposite; you removed a lot of unsourced and sourced information. If there was an issue with the unsourced information, it would've been better to add a ^{[better source needed]} tag instead, especially considering that the information on this article isn't politically contentious. In addition you removed a lot of sourced content. Please self-revert. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 13:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

@KhndzorUtogh hello. Current demographic table shows more details, therefore I reverted your edit. I partially recovered the part where it contained more information about the earthquake and emigration — Toghrul R (t) 13:26, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

I restored the tags that you removed on other articles because an outdated source from a century ago isn't appropriate especially for contentious information. Also the source isn't reliably published and is a no-name publication, its not academic or scholarly. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 13:38, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

@KhndzorUtogh Firstly, it didn't have any relation with this article. You could have written about restoring the tags on my talk page. Please, revert and we may discuss about that issue. Currently we are talking about Spitak article, not other districts. — Toghrul R (t) 13:46, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply