Talk:Simple Kind of Life

Simple Kind of Life has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 10, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed

Gwen Stefani Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gwen Stefani, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gwen Stefani on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gwen StefaniWikipedia:WikiProject Gwen StefaniTemplate:WikiProject Gwen StefaniGwen Stefani
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

Rock music Mid‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Pop 100

Latest comment: 19 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Um ... didn't exist back when this song came out, so why is it shown charting at #36? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.195.77.130 (talk) 20:05, March 24, 2007 (UTC)

You're right; the source didn't list the Pop 100, so I've removed it. Thanks for pointing that out. ShadowHalo 22:57, 24 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Pass: The article meets the requirements, but doesn't read like a very pleasant article. It's very nice the way it is, but I offer several suggestions that are based on personal preference:

Streamline your writing, make some compound sentences alongside shorter statements. The way it is now makes it seem as if each fact was extracted from the reference separately, and makes for very choppy reading. Also, iterations of the title could still be reduced, though it's obvious you did a good job the first time around.
I'm not sure if this is standard in these articles, but details like chord progressions and what specific notes the song reach are totally necessary. "Music and structure" delves into too much detail, and possibly could be merged with the preceding section.
In "chart performance," make clear a separation between international and domestic results. Use a conjunction (probably "However") or make it a new paragraph. Also, any information on why it was such a failure?
Muller seems significant enough to warrant a parenthetical clause describing her profession. (...Muller, a prominent British music video director.)

That's all, I don't have much to say because the article is very good. I think the sections are short, but not void of content, meaning I think the two chart sections could be merged somehow, the aforementioned detail could be cut, and overall the writing could use a massage (but that's always the case). ALTON .ıl 00:11, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply