Talk:Seco-LSD
Add topicLatest comment: 7 months ago by ~2025-39012-71 in topic Incorrect nomenclature
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Seco-LSD article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This set index article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Incorrect nomenclature
[edit]The first two examples are mislabeled as seco- compounds, only 10,11-seco-LSD is correctly using the nomenclature. As per IUPAC blue book definition, the other two examples should instead be 4-nor-LSD and 9-nor-LSD, because a carbon atom has been deleted.
IUPAC Blue Book (2013), Section P-93.1.3: “Nor- and homo- prefixes in natural products.” Defines nor- as carbon removal and gives examples. ~2025-39012-71 (talk) 08:55, 7 December 2025 (UTC)