Edge Rewrite
Jump to content

Talk:Sarah Boysen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Pashute in topic main claims section?

sarah boysen

[edit]

How you guys dont tell everything about her Jaivion1515 (talk) 23:28, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

main claims section?

[edit]

1. Symbolic thought not exclusive to humans: from numerical competence.

1a. Numerical Competence: chimpanzees could learn to

  • resolve quantity-based tasks
  • use Arabic numerals to represent quantities
  • solve basic mathematical problems using basic concepts.
  • perform symbolic matching ,

1b. Self control

  • inhibiting initial impulses for better outcome

2. Cognitive evolutionary continuity - Leading primitive stages for complex cognitive traits and capabilities. Studies with dogs, pigs, Capuchin monkeys

  • Social learning
  • Tool use
  • Quantitative reasoning


Countering the claims

[edit]

Daniel Povinelli in Folk Physics of Apes, claims the animals are just relying on behavioral rules,not "understanding" the underlying "cause and effect". i.e. pressing 3 just means symbol with no meaning is associated a pattern which gives a reword. Thinking that the animal "understands" is a mistake.

Edward Thorndike in Law of Effect, claims that all learning, including animal and human learning is trial-and-error and reinforcement associative training, rather than insight or reasoning. Thus the question of reasoning and insight is not to be discussed.

John W Davis and S.R Memmot set narrow and strict definitions of language and counting intentionally excluding non-human performance. They claim the lab experiments are anthropomorphism, imposing non natural concerns and tasks which the animals do not possess, and then forcing onto them unfit terms.

Help me update and enter into main argal

פשוט pashute ♫ (talk) 09:30, 6 July 2026 (UTC)Reply