Talk:Ryotwari

India: History Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Indian history (assessed as Low-importance).

More information:
/
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Mid‑importance

	Economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 19 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This needs work! Too much of the article is taken up with the Zamindari system, and the contrasts are too stark. It does not explain the excessive burden on the cultivator, a feature common to the Ryotwari and the Zamindari systems, or the lack of saving and capital formation which resulted. The subject is of fundamental importance.Fconaway 11:25, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Reply