Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Engineering

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

ScopeMaster

As the author of ScopeMaster, I won't make any changes to this page, but may I ask that ScopeMaster is shown in the table as having VM_MBSE please. To my knowledge, it is the only tool on the list that automatically generates use case model diagrams from written requirements. It also does other things that are important to requirements engineering (tests the requirements, sizes requirements and generates functional test scenarios from them) so could it please have the "OTHER" ticked too. Many thanks --Colinrhammond (talk) 13:11, 8 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I've re-added it, not having any COI with it. It belongs to the list as the other tools.

Done 17387349L8764 (talk) 13:55, 15 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Many thanks Sir,

BTW it should have a tick in the Agile column too. As it can analyse user stories automatically and it has a kanban feature. Colinrhammond (talk) 17:24, 13 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Since fiddling with the entry is apparently irresistible to the paid editor, I have removed it again. MrOllie (talk) 14:48, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Could you kindly re-add it. Many thanks in advance. Colinrhammond (talk) 21:33, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

No, Colin. We're not going to help you advertise. - MrOllie (talk) 21:52, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Every other tool on the list is being "advertised", why are you bullying us off of Wikipedia and depriving readers of knowledge that should be shared? Colinrhammond (talk) 13:53, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Could somebody without a COI please look to re-add ScopeMaster, it is one tool that satisfies all 6 of the ISO/IEC TR 24766:2009, major tool capabilities listed at the top of this article. Colinrhammond (talk) 03:03, 28 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Just for reference, Canada is the second government that is using the tool for requirements analysis. It would be nice to see it on the list.

https://www.scopemaster.com/press-releases/approved-by-esdc-canada/ Colinrhammond (talk) 12:43, 8 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

You may find that Yonix is not yet an available product, perhaps it should be removed from the list for now. Colinrhammond (talk) 12:50, 8 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Edit request: Add TraceBoard Suite to RE tool list table

Latest comment: 1 hour ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The user below has a request that an edit be made to Requirements engineering tools. That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest.
The requested edits backlog is very high. Please be extremely patient. There are currently 898 requests waiting for review.

Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. Remember to set the |answered= parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input.

Hello! I am a representative of NordTrace Solutions, the developer behind **TraceBoard Suite**, a safety-critical requirements management and ALM platform. To adhere to Wikipedia's Conflict of Interest guidelines (WP:COI), I am requesting an independent editor to review and consider adding TraceBoard Suite to the comparison table under the RE tool list section.

The product is indexed in recognized systems engineering and software directories, including the INCOSE/PPI Systems Engineering Tools Database (SETDB), G2, and Capterra.

Below is the exact wikitext for the proposed table row, formatted to match the current table schema and sorted alphabetically under "T":

Summary of Capabilities:**

**Agile / ALM / ISM / PJM:** Supports sprints, problem resolution, task tracking, and full lifecycle integration.
**RM / TM / VCS:** Core requirements engineering, trace matrices, test execution tracking (TraceTest), and direct Git commit linking (GitHub, GitLab, Gitea).
**Other:** ReqIF 1.0/1.2 support.

Thank you in advance to any volunteer editor willing to review and apply this update! NordmanFinn (talk) 12:31, 3 October 2026 (UTC)Reply