Talk:Redheaded slut

Food and drink: Beverages Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This article is within the scope of the Beverages Task Force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

propose disambiguation

this page should be two articles.

Remove invention claim

Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

The second invention claim is not backed up by citation, all it does is detract from the citated & highly-likely inventor. Jcmcc450 (talk) 16:06, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Good point. I'll remove it, pending a citation. -Phoenixrod (talk) 20:03, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I forget where I read it, probably Jeff Hollinger's book, a comment that went something like "no drink has truly reached classic status until it has multiple false invention myths". - Wikidemon (talk) 20:53, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

If you find the claim in the book, feel free to add it back into the article. The version I removed was rather vague. -Phoenixrod (talk) 03:14, 30 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

"Read-headed slut" listed at Redirects for discussion

Latest comment: 29 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The redirect Read-headed slut has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 July 10 § Read-headed slut until a consensus is reached. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 04:30, 10 July 2026 (UTC)Reply