Talk:Red Line (Lagos Transit)
Add topicRed Line (Lagos Transit) is currently a Transport good article nominee. Nominated by Faisalisonline2 (talk) at 14:47, 6 August 2026 (UTC) This article is ready to be reviewed in accordance with the good article criteria. Any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review the article and decide if it should be listed as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and then save the page. See the instructions. |
| Red Line (Lagos Transit) was nominated as a Engineering and technology good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (August 4, 2026, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Red Line (Lagos Transit)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Faisalisonline2 (talk · contribs) 18:40, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: MadelynnSienna (talk · contribs) 21:53, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
| Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Well-written: | ||
| 1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | 1. Some words need to be changed to improve readability.
2. There are issues with verb usage.
3. There is improper use of punctuation.
4. Some words need to be made plural.
5. Inconsistent or incorrect capitalisation
6. Some sentences can be shortened.
7. Several sentences make little to no sense in their current form.
| |
| 1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
1. MOS:GEOLINK 2. Several cases of MOS:Overlink: Blue Line, Wisconsin and Lagos Metropolitan Area Transport Authority (LAMATA) are linked multiple times within the same level 2 heading. 3. The link to the timetable under Operation should be removed. | |
| 2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
| 2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
1. Reference number 9 link to a 404 page. 2. Some citations are improperly formatted.
3. Most of the sources do not meet the WP:RS threshold.
| |
| 2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
1. The following statements lack a source:
| |
| 2c. it contains no original research. | Not reviewed due to the quick fail. | |
| 2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | Earwig's Copyvio Detector report indicates:
Both of these articles seem to involve the paragraph "In January 2022, Lagos State Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu visited the US state of Wisconsin, to purchase two Talgo sets for service on the Red Line. They had been ordered by Wisconsin for use on the Amtrak Hiawatha in 2009, but they were never placed in service, and were instead stored. Talgo VIII cars are based on the unique technology of the Talgo Pendular model, which (similar to a bicycle rider) leans into a curve resulting in less sideways force and a higher comfort for passengers when driving over a curvy track. The "leaning" of the car is passive i.e. it happens purely by the resulting force, without electronics, sensors or engines." which is included almost identically in this wikipedia page. | |
| 3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
| 3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Not reviewed due to the quick fail. | |
| 3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Not reviewed due to the quick fail. | |
| 4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | Not reviewed due to the quick fail. | |
| 5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Seems to be. | |
| 6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
| 6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Appears to be. | |
| 6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Appears to be. | |
| 7. Overall assessment. | Quick failing this under Criteria 1 and 2, as it is a long way from meeting the well-written and verifiable with no original research good article requirements. | |
- Good article nominees
- Good article nominees awaiting review
- Former good article nominees
- C-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/11 May 2025
- Accepted AfC submissions
- C-Class Africa articles
- Unknown-importance Africa articles
- WikiProject Africa articles
- C-Class Nigeria articles
- Unknown-importance Nigeria articles
- C-Class Lagos articles
- Unknown-importance Lagos articles
- WikiProject Lagos articles
- C-Class rail transport articles
- Unknown-importance rail transport articles
- All WikiProject Trains pages
- C-Class Transport articles
- Unknown-importance Transport articles
- WikiProject Transport articles
