Talk:Red Croatia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Red Croatia article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to the Balkans or Eastern Europe.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator.

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review prior discussions if you are considering renomination.

Keep, 23 January 2007, see discussion.
Keep, 04 March 2006, see discussion.

Croatia Mid‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ethnic groups Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

European history Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dubious

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've removed most of the blathering that seemed to stem from that old election-time pamphlet that had linked Doclean Academy of Sciences and Arts and Milo Đukanović's political campaign. A reference would be necessary to avoid this mention looking like soapboxing. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 09:28, 22 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

This is pure Croatian Nationslism nothing about history

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Collapsed forum conversation

I nice try to represent Zahumle and people there as Croats by making out some conclusions which don't exist in history. This is pure croatian nationalism, nothing to do whit history. 2A01:C22:C1D2:E500:F43A:82BD:C7BF:EBB (talk) 15:17, 24 November 2022 (UTC) I believe that source are included in the article. Right? Walter9 (talk) 19:18, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

This is not historical term

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Collapsed forum conversation

This is not historical, but pseudo-historical. Specifically, this term first appears in a transcript, not in the original, of the Chronicle of the Priest of Duklja. The manuscript was created within the Catholic Church in Croatia in the 14th century, if I recall correctly (commissioned by the Šubić family, who used it to justify their expansion into Hum, which was previously under the Nemanjić dynasty). Dandolo and Biondo (the only ones, alongside this transcript, to mention "Red Croatia") adopted this term from the transcript, not from the original source. The term was later misused in the second half of the 19th and 20th centuries to support the territorial ambitions of Croatian nationalists and chauvinists in Bosnia and Herzegovina. 46.239.6.185 (talk) 10:01, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply