Talk:Qaimkhani
Add topicLatest comment: 7 months ago by Shaheerthepro in topic Edit request on 29 December 2025
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
Speculation
[edit]This is just a speculation:
- The historian Dirk Kolff has queried whether the Kaimkhani have Turkbachcha origins
The larger version of the article, most of which has been removed, had information that appears to have been largely reliable based on the information I have seen.
Malaiya (talk) 00:08, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
I will create an article on Kyamkhan Ras and Nainsi Ri Khyat in the next few months. Malaiya (talk) 01:03, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
For some details on the two historical texts see
Semi-protected edit request on 27 June 2024
[edit] | This edit request to Kayamkhani has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
2409:40D4:2005:F893:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 04:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. JTP (talk • contribs) 05:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 29 October 2024
[edit] | This edit request to Kayamkhani has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change all occurrences of "Qaimkhan" to "Kayamkhani" in this article. Onekayyum (talk) 04:32, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Please put in a move request (WP:RM). Dawnseeker2000 06:04, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Edit request on 29 December 2025
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
- What I think should be changed
| − | Languages | + | Languages Urdu, Sindhi, Rajasthani, Qaimkhani Boli. |
- Why it should be changed: It is the native dialect of the Qaimkhani community.
- References: https://sujo.usindh.edu.pk/index.php/TAHQIQ/article/view/2616/2012, on pages 1 "Later on his descendents and boli (dialect) inherited this term." and page 6 that after the partition, the dialect became attributed to the Qaimkhanis and was called 'Qaimkhani Boli'.
Shaheerthepro (talk) 13:07, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
References
Not done: as you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 13:46, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, I have added a source for my edit request. Shaheerthepro (talk) 17:08, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
| This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
- What I think should be changed
| − | Qaimkhani (also spelled Qayam Khani, Kayamkhani or as Kaimkhani) is a Muslim community of India | + | Qaimkhani (also spelled Qayam Khani, Kayamkhani or as Kaimkhani) is a Muslim community of India and Pakistan. |
- Why it should be changed: The Qaimkhani people are significant in both countries, more so in Pakistan. Saying they are only a community in India is slightly misleading. It is true they originated in India, but the sentence does not seem to state if it is talking about origins.
- References: The Wikipedia article itself states "Most of them migrated to Pakistan". This means they are mostly in Pakistan, and therefore they are a Pakistani Muslim community too.
Shaheerthepro (talk) 13:17, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
| This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
References
- Not done: as you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 13:46, 29 December 2025 (UTC)