Talk:Psychometric software

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Software: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Statistics

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Removing links

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Why remove all the links? Without them (and they took a while to track down) the list is pretty useless. Rconroy (talk) 21:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Untitled

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Khan.edu, thank you for starting this topic. However, it fits the title of psychometric software, as 1) it is more specific, and 2) the various software programs do not do any measurement, they do psychometric analysis. Please keep it here.Iulus Ascanius (talk) 03:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply