Talk:Proof of Heaven

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted on 28 August 2014 by reviewer Timtrent (talk · contribs).

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

Neuroscience Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory, conspiracy theories, and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Language heavily favours sceptics

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I'm going to be fixing part of this because the page uses words like "notes" and others to lend weight to the skeptics. Tiggy The Terrible (talk) 08:55, 1 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hey @Black Kite:, could you tell me which specific parts you had problems with and which were the weasel words? As far as I can tell, I've removed several weasel words like 'noted' from the page. Tiggy The Terrible (talk) 11:38, 1 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

WP:CLAIM is the main issue, I think. Black Kite (talk) 11:56, 1 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Second part of introduction?

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The second part contains no source and is written with very flawed grammar. Feels almost like something written by someone connected to the author? Dkistheedge (talk) 20:53, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply