Talk:Pop Style
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Jonesey95 in topic Does not pass WP:NSONGS yet
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pop Style article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please read WP:NSONGS: "Songs and singles are probably notable if they have been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label." "The 'subject' of a work means non-trivial treatment and excludes mere mention of the song/single, its musician/band or of its publication, price listings and other non-substantive detail treatment."
Work on adding references that meet these criteria to Draft:Pop Style, and then copy that article over this redirect when that has been done. Until then, this article should remain a redirect to the article for the album. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:56, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Categories:
- B-Class Hip-hop articles
- Mid-importance Hip-hop articles
- WikiProject Hip-hop articles
- B-Class song articles
- B-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- B-Class American music articles
- Unknown-importance American music articles
- WikiProject American music articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- B-Class Canada-related articles
- Mid-importance Canada-related articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
