Talk:Panjkora Valley
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Rmhermen in topic Merge
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Merge
[edit]It does not seem sensible to have separate articles for the river and the valley - particularly with inconsistent spelling. Mhockey (talk) 09:23, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose A river is not a valley. In fact a river need not have a valley, nor a valley, a river. No reason to merge to different geographical features. Rmhermen (talk) 05:05, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
- comment This is true; however, in this case, both articles are rather short; does the river really need it's own article? Is it notable enough or would it be sufficient as a section in the article about the valley (or vice versa)? --KarlB (talk) 05:59, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
- Wikipedia generally holds all rivers (and town, mountains, etc.) are notable. Rmhermen (talk) 22:38, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
- comment This is true; however, in this case, both articles are rather short; does the river really need it's own article? Is it notable enough or would it be sufficient as a section in the article about the valley (or vice versa)? --KarlB (talk) 05:59, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Pakistan articles
- Low-importance Pakistan articles
- WikiProject Pakistan articles
- C-Class geography articles
- Low-importance geography articles
- WikiProject Geography articles
- C-Class South Asia articles
- Low-importance South Asia articles
- South Asia articles
- Articles wikified as part of WikiProject Wikify