Talk:Notehall
Add topicLatest comment: 5 years ago by 76.111.77.55 in topic Entry Probably Outdated
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Entry Probably Outdated
[edit]This article seems to be mostly outdated, as Notehall doesn't seem to be online anymore (at least not at the address provided). A disclaimer should at least be provided until the page is updated further, no? 76.111.77.55 (talk) 08:01, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Criticism Section
[edit]I've added a criticism section to this article to balance it a bit. Octavabasso (talk) 14:08, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
- And now... looking through the history of the article, it is clear that someone on in past had added a "controversy" section, but that was removed. If anyone wants to remove the criticism section I put in, I suggest discussing the merits of that here, first. Octavabasso (talk) 16:40, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- And now... someone, probably with Notehall, is reverting that section, just as happened last time. Octavabasso (talk) 01:44, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- You will be pleased to know, Octavabasso (talk), that "Criticism" section has remained intact. I have added just a little to it, and cleaned up the page a little. Good work! This is a well-balanced article. --FeralOink (talk) 17:55, 28 August 2012 (UTC)