Talk:New Masters

New Masters was nominated as a Music good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (August 24, 2026, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Roots music Low‑importance

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Roots music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to roots, folk and traditional folk music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Roots musicWikipedia:WikiProject Roots musicTemplate:WikiProject Roots musicRoots music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA review

Latest comment: 1 month ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Unsuccessful. WikipediholicRat (talk) 22:08, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:New Masters/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi, I'm going to review this page. WikipediholicRat (talk) 19:39, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

There are many issues in this article, which cause it to be quite far off from meeting the good article criteria. First of all, my spot check failed. Almost all sources I was able to access did not verify what they were supposed to. The article's text is confusing. There are several manual of style violations, some of which I fixed, some if which I wasn't sure how to. This includes "summer of 1967" being mentioned in the lead (see MOS:SEASON), an apostrophe almost every time Stevens's last name is mentioned (incorrect in a possessive too; see MOS:POSS), and several MOS:SEAOFBLUE violations (which I have fixed), and you saying "string-" instead of "string" twice.

Nonetheless, I appreciate your work on this article. I think it's great, I just don't think it's ready to be a GA yet. I'm excited to see how it is on GA2! Have a great day. WikipediholicRat (talk) 22:08, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Nominator: VirreFriberg (talk · contribs) 16:40, 5 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: WikipediholicRat (talk · contribs) 19:39, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.