Talk:Musca vetustissima
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Ghostofpunk in topic Citation with incorrect page number
A fact from Musca vetustissima appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 June 2010. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Citation with incorrect page number
[edit]Hi! I noticed that the source for the breeding/migration in springtime is listed for the incorrect page. The Mullen & Durden book is cited for page 278, but Australian bush flies are not mentioned until slightly later in the text. I believe the correct page citation is 288. I do not know how to edit a citation. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thank you! Ghostofpunk (talk) 00:27, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- Start-Class Insects articles
- Low-importance Insects articles
- WikiProject Insects articles
- Start-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- Start-Class Australian biota articles
- Low-importance Australian biota articles
- WikiProject Australian biota articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Start-Class Diptera articles
- Mid-importance Diptera articles
- WikiProject Diptera articles



