Talk:Monocoupe 90

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Move?

Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I believe this should be renamed to something else. I don't know what. Perhaps it can wait until there are more Monocoupe aircraft on the servers. --Colputt 01:11, 2 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Could rename it to just Monocoupe... since the variants are numberous. I just added another variant with ref. Vote "FOR" Monocoupe. Should check "What links here" on the article: 5 other redirects to Monocoupe 90, and 32+ links to the article. Clean up of the other redirects would be highly desirable to do as well. Don't wnat to leave a convoluted mess. LanceBarber 07:50, 2 October 2007 (UTC)Reply