Talk:McAlpine v Bercow

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Damages

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copied from the main SB article's Talk page. Basically, I suspect the damages are £15k, although of course the legal costs push up what she's having to cough up into the unpleasant category:

Not sure why Lord McAlpine would allow her to accept the £15k offer that was made back in January, before she forced him to drag her to court, but it's looking a little like he might have. The Express quotes his solicitor talking as if the offer has been accepted by both sides, but then goes on to contradict itself the following day by saying she's facing £50k damages. The Independent mentions £15k and also talks of some of the £100k legal bill being offset by insurance.Bromley86 (talk) 13:46, 26 May 2013 (UTC)Reply