Talk:Margaret Romans
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Steven547 in topic Deletion of unnecessary trivia and excessive "facts
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Margaret Romans article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notability tag
[edit]I have added 2 more secondary sources to establish more notability to Margaret Romans. Are there currently enough sources on the article to establish notability to remove the notability tag? PrezDough (talk) 07:56, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Adding multiple sources from before her notability (becoming oldest living Canadian) and multiple sources that mention becoming the oldest and subsequent birthdays does not justify an article if there is no worthwhile content beyond verification of her age. There isn't. Won't be on List of the verified oldest people for at least a year and won't become oldest ever Canadian for another 4. There's not even enough worthwhile encyclopedic content for a mini-bio at List of Canadian supercentenarians. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 22:11, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
- Being covered for her age before she was the oldest Canadian and her getting that title sounds like 2 different events to me there is also a source covering the YMCA she worked at which was way before either of those 2 things Steven547 (talk) 22:30, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
Protection request
[edit]There is an editor who is trying to engage in an edit war over removing sourced material without trying to get consensus 74.209.42.125 (talk) 19:47, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Deletion of unnecessary trivia and excessive "facts
[edit]I would like to see Romans' article a little less packed with irrelevant and unnecessary facts. I have attempted this on multiple occasions, however, an extremely arrogant editor insists on reverting edits and reverts which have been made by much more experienced users. MattSucci (talk) 21:23, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
- Not sure how the date she was baptized is an irrelevant fact thats a pretty important life event and its ironic that you call me arrogant when the only thing im asking for is a discussion on this while you were the one blindly engaging in a edit war.Steven547 (talk) 22:13, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
- @MattSucci edits being reverted isnt a consensus explain how her baptism is just "trival" I will admit what her parents did for work doesnt really matter but a baptism is an important life event for most people Steven547 (talk) 22:40, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- Start-Class Quebec articles
- Low-importance Quebec articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- Start-Class WikiProject Women articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women articles
- Start-Class Longevity articles
- Unknown-importance Longevity articles
- WikiProject Longevity articles
- Start-Class Latvia articles
- Unknown-importance Latvia articles
- WikiProject Latvia articles
