This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Marcus Aurelius article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article is within the scope of the Roman and Byzantine Emperors WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the Roman and Byzantine emperors. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Roman and Byzantine emperorsWikipedia:WikiProject Roman and Byzantine emperorsTemplate:WikiProject Roman and Byzantine emperorsRoman and Byzantine emperors
Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article describes the outstretched hand gesture on the equestrian statue as an act of clemency to a bested enemy, but the linked main article about the statue describes the same gesture as an address made by a military commander to his troops. Could someone please clarify this? Random-person-on-the-interwebz (talk) 04:04, 31 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey there! I have begun working on a Navbox template about emperor Marcus Aurelius (Draft:Template:Marcus Aurelius), aiming to be as detailed and comprehensive as possible. The issue is that in the process I found a Sidebar person template (Template:Marcus Aurelius). Should I work on that one instead, can the two coexist or should it be remplaced by my template? I don't think it would Sidebar one would look good being as detailed, but having both would be redundant. Some feedback would be appreciated, thanks in advance. NeoGaze (talk) 09:49, 22 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
