Talk:Macchiaioli

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsVisual arts

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

European history Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

is this the same thing as ? Matt 00:02, 21 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Yes Giano | talk 14:32, 21 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Date of the photograph

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The filename of the photograph of the Macchiaioli at the Caffè Michelangiolo indicates a date of 1900, but this can't be right. The man at upper right with the sraw hat is identifiable as Odoardo Borrani (b. 1832), and he looks much younger than 68 here; others are harder to identify but the fellow pouring strongly resembles Silvestro Lega (b.1826). In any case, according to Broude (p. 52), the Caffè Michelangiolo only existed from 1848 to 1866. Ewulp (talk) 02:07, 17 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

This isn't an article, it's a hagiography

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

While it's good that these artist receive recognition, it's too bad that wikipedia is degenerating into opinion and preaching. 47.232.145.208 (talk) 08:07, 22 June 2025 (UTC)Reply