This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Liberal Christianity article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
When the article says that liberal Christianity grew out of "Enlightenment rationalism and romanticism of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries", should it not add "respectively" after the words centuries? My understanding is that die Aufklarung, or the Enlightenment, was in the eighteenth century, romanticism was a nineteenth century movement. YTKJ (talk) 14:53, 6 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
@Drmies Since you have raised questions, I wanted to add some info on EP Sanders.
Sanders was extraordinarily influential compared to his peers. He revolutionized multiple fields of study while most scholars only touch their own.
Here is a memorial post by New Testament scholar Bart Ehrman on Sanders' impact
A Truly Great New Testament Scholar: E. P. Sanders in Memoriam - The Bart Ehrman Blog Silverfish2024 (talk) 20:01, 12 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
After much frustration during editing, Ive discovered there are TWO pages titled LIBERAL CHRISTIANITY. I am a novice editor & I dont know where to report duplicate pages. These 2 pages might be able to be combined. I apologize if this is NOT the page to report duplicate pages. I have no idea where to report those. Sorry! LMilagros5472 (talk) 18:20, 30 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 month ago3 comments3 people in discussion
"literal interpretation of the Bible" is not basic Christian doctrine. Very far from it. The vast majority of Christians don't believe in biblicism. And even those who claim to do Sola Scriptura, believe in theology, not in the Bible. I have never met a Christian who believes in the Bible. tgeorgescu (talk) 07:23, 16 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
I have met one. My deceased mother. She had owned a multivolume translation of the Bible with commentary by church theologians (which I have inherited and still own), but never bothered to read a single page from it, despite loudly proclaiming that every word was true. In contrast, my atheist grandfather liked to quote specific passages from the Book of Exodus and got great amusement by pointing out all the untruths, contradictions, and absurdities in the Pentateuch. I have met several atheists and at least one neo-pagan who studied the Bible primarily to dispute its accuracy. I have yet to meet a single Christian who bothered to open a bible to study it, and I am middle-aged. Dimadick (talk) 11:13, 18 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
I wonder if this a regional and/or denominational experience issue. There are many churches in the American Evangelical movement that see biblicism as a core aspect of their doctrine. RC Sproul's books populate many bookshelves of American Evangelical Christian students. The John MacArthur Study Bible, which prints biblicist commentary interspersed throughout the scriptures, is one of the most popular Bibles in evangelical churches. If authors of this article are American, or have been subject to the loudness of American evangelical missionary teaching, then literal interpretation of the Bible likely seems like basic Christian doctrine. Lills42 (talk) 16:39, 14 June 2026 (UTC)Reply