Talk:Lexical definition

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics / Philosophy of language High‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.
	This article is supported by Philosophy of language task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Philosophy: Logic / Language Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic
	Philosophy of language

Someone more familiar with the computing usage is encouraged to edit this and expand (or correct) the bottom portion... Mindspillage 05:06, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Improve this article

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, I’m completing a university course on Wikipedia and would like to make the following recommendations for this article. I recommend the addition of the headings 'Usage' and 'References'. I also recommend the addition of two resources, first ^[1] and second ^[2] (Oxford Reference combines about a million entries from their Dictionaries, Companions and Encyclopedias).

--MeerkatShadow (talk) 05:45, 18 September 2018 (UTC).Reply

References

↑ "OED".
↑ "Oxford Reference".

Meta Dicdef

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This is a dictionary definition of a definition. Bearian (talk) 04:08, 2 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

[1] "OED".

[2] "Oxford Reference".

[1]

[2]