Edge Rewrite
Jump to content

Talk:Korma/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Crystalite13 in topic GA review

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Crystalite13 (talk · contribs) 16:21, 2 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Ah, lucky I looked at the GAN list, the bot failed to ping me. Many thanks for reviewing. Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:19, 4 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Dang! Anyway, now that minor stuff is done, I'll be happy to accept. i'm also reviewing A Walking Song in case you didn't get pinged for that either. Crystalite13 (talk) 20:52, 4 February 2026 (UTC)Reply


It's me again! Hi Chiswick!

Prose

[edit]

Lead

[edit]

Lead looks good, no problems here! checkY

Etymology

[edit]

Consider changing "such as Persian: قورمه ghormeh, Turkish kavurma" to "such as the Persian: قورمه ghormeh, the Turkish kavurma" since you already wrote "the Azerbaijani qovurma or kavarma"

Done.

History

[edit]

"Korma has its roots" could be changed to "Korma stems from" or "Korma originates from" to be a little more straight to the point.

Done.

"with the rice" could be changed to "with rice" since while it does refer to the rice used in the dish "with rice" rolls of the tongue a little better.

Done.

"but it added" to "but added" again, just rolls of the tongue a little easier.

Done.

 Preceding unsigned comment added by Crystalite13 (talkcontribs) 18:14, 2 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Preparation

[edit]

checkY All good here!

Serving

[edit]

"In the banquets" to "In banquets"

Done.

Variations

[edit]
[edit]

checkY All good here!

In Indonesia

[edit]

checkY All good here!

In the United Kingdom

[edit]

checkY All good here!

In the United States

[edit]

checkY All good here!

Sources

[edit]

Spotcheck

[edit]
Ref 3: checkY
Ref 6: checkY
Ref 20: checkY
Ref 23: checkY
Ref 8: checkY

Copyvio

[edit]

Earwig gave a 30% on Copyvio, and looking at it, it seems fine, so checkY

Stable

[edit]

checkY no problems here!

Neutral

[edit]

checkY Neutral as far as I can see!

Media

[edit]

checkY All the media is relevant and tagged properly, really love the diagram you made!

Thank you!

Captions

[edit]

checkY All appropriate!

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.