Edge Rewrite
Jump to content

Talk:Kimigayo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleKimigayo has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starKimigayo is part of the Law Regarding the National Flag and National Anthem (Japan) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 24, 2007Good article nomineeListed
October 17, 2010Good topic candidatePromoted
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 3, 2022.
Current status: Good article
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Kimigayo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:38, 29 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Kimigayo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:35, 6 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kimigayo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:24, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

What is "slated" supposed to mean in this sentence?

[edit]

"Hashimoto Toru, the mayor of Osaka, slated [sic] the teachers as "It was good that criminals [teachers] who are intent on breaking the rules [of not singing the state anthem] have risen to the surface [public]"? Please clarify. Autodidact1 (talk) 00:20, 13 August 2019 (UTC) Deleted sentence; rewrite and clarify. Autodidact1 (talk) 17:19, 13 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

The use of "slated" is colloquial, specific to British English, and it's vulgar; that's why I deleted the sentence. Wikipedia is not the place for colloquial British English. See https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/slated Autodidact1 (talk) 16:51, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Need confirmation of translation

[edit]

The second line, "千代に八千代に" should be more accurately translated as "For ever and ever" or "for eternity". Is it correct? Pichnat Thong (talk) 11:45, 3 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

No. "千代に八千代に" literally means ("For 1,000 years to 8,000 years"). 115.84.95.19 (talk) 02:12, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Completely correct, and just to reemphasize the point so we do not impose colloquial but inaccurate translations, 千代に八千代に literally means "For 1,000 years to 8,000 years" and that is the correct translation into English. Chandlerburr (talk) 22:52, 5 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Controversy section does not, currently, mention the real controversy

[edit]

I just read this page for the first time. I was a jr high school English teacher in Nagano-ken for a year, and it is startling that the by far most important controversy surrounding Kimi Ga Yo is in the Controversy section. The anthem is controversial because it was used by the right wing pre- and during World War II and is a rallying cry used by the Japanese right wing since the War's end into the present. It is considered fascist, imperialist, militaristic, and a symbol of the Japanese government that colonized large portions of Asia and brought Japan into the War. Many Japanese on the left will not sing it, and singing it in Japanese schools generates a very strong, tense reaction of -depending on the politics of the individual teachers - shock, anger, and tension. Imagine the political and emotional complications from singing "Deutschland Deutschland uber alles" - the reaction is similar if not stronger. Can someone more educated on the top include this crucial part of Kimi Ga Yo's meaning in Japanese history and culture. (Merely bc it's funny although equally underlining the point, gay Japanese people who are left of center and want to be provocative might sing the song in another version, Kimi Gay Yo, as if the Emperor were gay. Were this done in public, it could elicit violence from conservative Japanese people.) Chandlerburr (talk) 23:04, 5 April 2026 (UTC)Reply