This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Following a recent deletion discussion, I've worked quickly to bring this article up to a more acceptable standard in terms of referencing and information, also adding further images and categories. Further improvements welcome – especially a DOB. A quick look at the number of pages that link to it indicates that it is worth updating and improving as and when further information becomes available. Libby norman (talk) 15:33, 5 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This is effectively a second article on the same topic but with the wrong title and I suggested a deletion. Another editor has suggested a merge of the two articles. I'm not sure there is much valid information in Jill Stuart Design that isn't already in Jill Stuart. Some information looks to me not to be usable due to poor and non third party sources. If anyone can see any information with refs that can be usefully added perhaps they can discuss it here – bearing in mind that Jill Stuart was flagged for deletion on 4 Oct but pulled back by the inclusion of more and better information with sources. I'd hate to see bad/unsourced information creep back in from another article. Libby norman (talk) 19:43, 7 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}