Talk:Jenna Haze

Semi-protected edit request on 19 January 2020

Reference 18 leads to a 404 page, I've found similar content in the following link: https://ispa.co.il/adult-film-industry-might-determine-the-victor-in-hd-dvd-format-wars/ FutureBoi (talk) 13:54, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

• Fixed. I have replaced the source. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 20:50, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

GA Reassessment

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Jenna Haze/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

Starts GA Reassessment. The reassessmment will follow the same sections of the Article. --Whiteguru (talk) 01:30, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

 

---

Result: Delisted. Legitmate concerns, no opposition or improvements made. --Whiteguru (talk) 00:09, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Article was listed GA on January 27, 2008, and assessed against the following depreciated SNG :

WP:PORNBIO
WP:PORNSTAR

The following criteria are relevant only to people involved in pornography (and should not be raised with regard to actors and models outside the pornography industry):

• The person has won a well-known and significant industry award. Awards in scene-related and ensemble categories are excluded from consideration.
• The person has made unique contributions to a specific pornographic genre, such as beginning a trend in pornography; starring in an iconic, groundbreaking or blockbuster feature; or being a member of an industry hall of fame such as the AVN Hall of Fame, XRCO Hall of Fame or equivalent.
• The person has been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media.

(RfC Closed 25 March 2019 Remove.)

Reassessment is now done against GA Criteria and consideration of meeting: WP:BASIC, WP:BLP, WP:NACTOR, WP:ENT, WP:GNG

---

• Lede mentions "after Missy". It is not clear whom this is referring to, when examining Reference 1
• Reference 5 does not mention Jenna Haze Darkside
• Reference 6 redirects to a default page for Excalibur Films
• Links to Jill Kelly Productions go to an article about Jill Kelly (actress). Jill Kelly Productions is one sentence on this page.
• Reference 13 is a dead link.
• Reference 16 is not a reliable source. It promotes her own website.
• Reference 31 is a dead link
• Reference 34 goes to a hijacked link.

Pageviews

• Last 90 days Pageviews: 81,525
• Daily average: 896
• Programmable Search Engine goes to Jenna Haze (lesbian) and Jenna Haze on Apple Music; a bit odd.

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Paragraph 3 in Career repeats links to Jill Kelly Productions MOS:REPEATLINK states that one link is sufficient.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	See above
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	See above
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Reference 14 mentions 'nomination for best feature adult entertainer' Reference 9 mentions 'Female Performer of the Year.' (2007) She wins awards for best oral sex, best group sex and Best Vignette Release. Claim to fame is the first Blu-ray release of adult material. See Reference 15 A number of adult awards in 2008, and shares 11th annual Adult Nightclub and Exotic Dancer Awards
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	The focus is for adult entertainment. References don't give any work after 2009, sites like Redtube and Xtube carry her video and productions. It is difficult to ascertain what notability this person has outside an x-rated environment.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	First created in 2004, 937 editors. Page has gone to semi-protection 2014, 2015 (twice), 2018, 2020, and is still under that protection. Page Considered at risk of repeated vandalism
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 Generic license.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Unstable page, unreliable sources reported, and lacking notability in mainstream media.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Semi-protected edit request on 1 April 2024

Her birthday is (BLP violation removed) 74.102.50.243 (talk) 08:56, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

•  Not done Please provide a reliable source for this information. 331dot (talk) 08:58, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
• Her birthdate is displayed in the verified x/twitter account: https://x.com/jennahaze . There is also this interview, which confirms her birth month being February: https://www.rogreviews.com/27103/interview-jenna-haze-2/ 2804:7F0:8459:95D5:E557:82AA:E586:B229 (talk) 19:20, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

  Twitter only lists her birthday. RogReviews is a self-published website that cannot be used for claims about third parties. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 02:05, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Years Active

Why does the photo box say she was active until 2019 when everything in the article indicates she stopped in 2012? ~2025-31584-38 (talk) 20:38, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

BLP breaking news

I removed a section relating to a breaking BLP issue. Lets not be on the sensationalist edge usingnsensa5iinalist news sources that are not RSs. Wait for it to be sensitively covered please. Spartaz ^Humbug! 18:54, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

I removed the material sourced to Complex and Daily News, both sensationalistic news outlets. BLPs must be written sensitively and conservatively. Please do not re-add the material without consensus. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 00:22, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

WP:NYDN only cautions against headlines. I guess we can wait to see if there is continuing coverage. Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:46, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Fair enough, but even considering the Daily News as reliable, I'm not sure we have multiple reliable third-party sources as required by WP:PUBLICFIGURE for such incidents. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 05:30, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you both for your sensible approach to this matter. Spartaz ^Humbug! 15:45, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

• Material removed for BLP reasons cannot be restored without a consensus to do so. That's why I cited BLP in my comment. I want to be clear that I will seek sanctions against any editor who tries to edit war it back in. Let's just wait for better sources and put something more sensitive into the article if/when the comprehensive coverage is there to support that. Thanks Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:40, 28 December 2025 (UTC)