This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Italian architecture article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I have updated the Contemporary architecture subsection to improve neutrality and ensure compliance with core Wikipedia policies. This included removing evaluative language and unsupported stylistic attributions, particularly those linking certain works to Neo‑futurism, which risked introducing original research. I also removed the image of the Generali Tower to avoid any promotional effect. The section now focuses strictly on verifiable works by internationally active architects.
Consequently, the Renewal architecture section and the Neo‑futurism content have been removed because they appeared promotional in tone and lacked reliable secondary sources. The only citation provided was the architect’s own website, which is a primary source and therefore insufficient to support the establishment of a stylistic category or theoretical framework under Wikipedia’s verifiability and no original research policies. ~2026-21098-02 (talk) 15:22, 5 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
