Edge Rewrite
Jump to content

Talk:Iron Maiden

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Binksternet in topic Litigiousness
Former featured articleIron Maiden is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 31, 2005.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 8, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
August 9, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
November 4, 2006Featured article reviewDemoted
January 14, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
October 19, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
December 27, 2011Good article nomineeListed
June 11, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Former featured article

December 25 formation and former name

[edit]

Steve Harris has now debunked both of these in print, twice this year: https://www.loudersound.com/bands-artists/steve-harris-interview-iron-maiden-early-years Charlotte the Harlot (talk) 18:37, 28 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

 Done HorrorLover555 (talk) 20:18, 28 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Litigiousness

[edit]

These jerks are absurdly protective of their trademark over a phrase coined over a century before any of them were born, but I can't find any reliable sources that address this. There's coverage of the individual lawsuits:

"Ion Maiden" video game lawsuit

"Iron and the Maiden" comic book lawsuit

"Maiden Wear" undergarments lawsuit

Almost anyone who ever covers these suits remarks on how over-reaching they are, but none of them seem aware that the lawsuit they're writing about isn't an isolated incident. I think their litigiousness deserves mention in this article; I'd argue it's what many people of my generation and younger know them from (the Ion Maiden lawsuit specifically), but my concern is that with no source explicitly recognizing the pattern, it would be Original Research. I couldn't find anything, but is anyone else aware of a reliable source discussing how lawsuit happy this band is? ~2025-34448-62 (talk) 00:10, 16 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tying the lawsuits together and making an overall statement would violate WP:SYNTH. It needs to be done like at Bose_Corporation#Legal_actions where sources are cited observing that Bose is litigious or overly protective of its IP. Binksternet (talk) 00:25, 16 January 2026 (UTC)Reply